References
- JohnsonJAToughSfor Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of CanadaDelayed child-bearingJ Obstet Gynaecol Can2012341809322260768
- AlshamiHAKadasneARKhalfanMIqbalSZMirghaniHMPregnancy outcome in late maternal age in a high-income developing countryArch Gynecol Obstet201128451113111621188401
- CarolanMFrankowskaDAdvanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: a review of the evidenceMidwifery201127679380120888095
- JahromiBNHusseiniZPregnancy outcome at maternal age 40 and olderTaiwan J Obstet Gynecol200847331832118935996
- ChanBCLaoTTEffect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcomeInt J Gynaecol Obstet2008102323724118606410
- Cleary-GoldmanJMaloneFDVidaverJfor FASTER ConsortiumImpact of maternal age on obstetric outcomeObstet Gynecol20051055 Pt 198399015863534
- SchoenCRosenTMaternal and perinatal risks for women over 44 – a reviewMaturitas200964210911319822268
- CzeizelAMaternal mortality, fetal death, congenital anomalies and infant mortality at an advanced maternal ageMaturitas1988Suppl 173813237113
- Salem YanivSLevyAWiznitzerAHolcbergGMazorMSheinerEA significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcomeArch Gynecol Obstet2011283475575920376672
- YogevYMelamedNBardinRTenenbaum-GavishKBen-ShitritGBen-HaroushAPregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal ageAm J Obstet Gynecol20102036558.e1e720965486
- GoldbergMFEdmondsLDOakleyGPReducing birth defect risk in advanced maternal ageJAMA19792422122922294490824
- CroenLAShawGMYoung maternal age and congenital malformations: a population-based studyAm J Public Health19958557107137733434
- HollierLMLevenoKJKellyMAMCIntireDDCunninghamFGMaternal age and malformations in singleton birthsObstet Gynecol2000965 Pt 170170611042304
- HaySBarbanoHIndependent effects of maternal age and birth order on the incidence of selected congenital malformationsTeratology1972632712794345335
- ReefhuisJHoneinMAMaternal age and non-chromosomal birth defects, Atlanta, 1968–2000: teenager or thirty-something, who is at risk?Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol200470957257915368555
- LoaneMDolkHMorrisJKfor EUROCAT Working GroupMaternal age-specific risk of non-chromosomal anomaliesBJOG200911681111111919485989
- GillSKBroussardCDevineOGreenRFRasmussenSAReefhuisJthe National Birth Defects Prevention StudyAssociation between maternal age and birth defects of unknown etiology – United States, 1997–2007Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol201294121010101822821755
- BairdPASadovnickADYeeIMMaternal age and birth defects: a population studyLancet199133787405275301671898
- SavvaGMWalkerKMorrisJKThe maternal age-specific live birth prevalence of trisomies 13 and 18 compared to trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)Prenat Diagn2010301576419911411
- HassoldTChiuDMaternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomyHum Genet198570111173997148
- ShermanSLAllenEGBeanLHFreemanSBEpidemiology of Down syndromeMent Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev200713322122717910090
- HagenAEntezamiMGasiorek-WiensAThe impact of first trimester screening and early fetal anomaly scan on invasive testing rates in women with advanced maternal ageUltraschall Med201132330230620972947
- SípekAGregorVHorácekJChudobováMDown syndrome in the Czech Republic during 1961–1997: prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and maternal-age-specific ratesJ Obstet Gynaecol200121326626912521857
- DolkHLoaneMGarneETrends and geographic inequalities in the prevalence of Down syndrome in Europe, 1980–1999Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique200553Spec No. 22S872S9516471148
- MorrisJKWaldNJMuttonDEAlbermanEComparison of models of maternal age-specific risk for Down syndrome live birthsPrenat Diagn200323325225812627430
- OokiSBirth defects in singleton versus multiple ART births in Japan (2004–2008)J Pregnancy2011201128570622175021
- OokiSBirth defects after assisted reproductive technology in Japan: comparison between multiples and singletons, 2004–2009ShiZInvitro Fertilization (Special Issue). Reproductive System and Sexual Disorders2012S5
- OokiSConcordance rates of birth defects after assisted reproductive technology among 17,258 Japanese twin pregnancies: a nationwide survey, 2004–2009J Epidemiol201323110.2188/jea.JE20120103
- OokiSMultiple congenital anomalies after assisted reproductive technology in Japan (between 2004 and 2009)ISRN Epidemiology Epub201310.5402/2013/452085
- GarneEDolkHLoaneMfor EUROCAT Working GroupPaper 5: Surveillance of multiple congenital anomalies: implementation of a computer algorithm in European registers for classification of casesBirth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol2011Suppl 1S445021384529
- RimmAAKatayamaACDiazMKatayamaKPA meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived childrenJ Assist Reprod Genet2004211243744315704519
- KällénBFinnströmOLindamANilssonENygrenKGOtterbladPOCongenital malformations in infants born after in vitro fertilization in SwedenBirth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol201088313714320063307
- SheblOEbnerTSirASommergruberMTewsGThe role of mode of conception in the outcome of twin pregnanciesMinerva Ginecol200961214115219255561
- ChenBYHwangBFGuoYLEpidemiology of congenital anomalies in a population-based birth registry in Taiwan, 2002J Formos Med Assoc2009108646046819515626
- SípekAHorácekJGregorVRychtaríkováJDzurováDMasátováDNeural tube defects in the Czech Republic during 1961–1999: incidences, prenatal diagnosis and prevalences according to maternal ageJ Obstet Gynaecol200222550150712521417
- PetrovaJGVaktskjoldAThe incidence of neural tube defects in Norway and the Arkhangelskaja Oblast in Russia and the association with maternal ageActa Obstet Gynecol Scand200988666767219353336
- Materna-KirylukAWiśniewskaKBadura-StronkaMParental age as a risk factor for isolated congenital malformations in a Polish populationPaediatr Perinat Epidemiol2009231294019228312
- The Ministry of Health Labor Welfare of Japan Available from: http://www1.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/1212/h1228-1_18.html (In Japanese)Accessed December 27, 2012
- The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/h22-houkoku.html. (In Japanese)Accessed December 27, 2012
- KimMAYeeNHChoiJSChoiJYSeoKPrevalence of birth defects in Korean livebirths, 2005–2006J Korean Med Sci201227101233124023091323
- RellerMDStricklandMJRiehle-ColarussoTMahleWTCorreaAPrevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005J Pediatr2008153680781318657826
- MillerARiehle-ColarussoTSiffelCFríasJLCorreaAMaternal age and prevalence of isolated congenital heart defects in an urban area of the United StatesAm J Med Genet A2011155A92137214521815253
- ZiadehSYahayaAPregnancy outcome at age 40 and olderArch Gynecol Obstet20012651303311327090
- DuongHTHoytATCarmichaelSLfor National Birth Defects Prevention StudyIs maternal parity an independent risk factor for birth defects?Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol201294423023622371332
- KällénBFinnströmONygrenKGOlaussonPOIn vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methodsBirth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol200573316216915678490