Precision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devices

References

• BlumenthalPVoedischAGemzell-DanielssonKStrategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraceptionHum Reprod Update20111712113720634208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiveStrong.com [webpage on the Internet]Teen pregnancy rates in the USA2011 Available from: http://www.livestrong.com/article/12504-teen-pregnancy-rates-usaAccessed January 17, 2012
   Google Scholar
• TrussellJContraceptive failure in the United StatesContraception20118339740421477680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodmanSHendlishSKReevesMFFoster-RosalesAImpact of immediate post-abortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortionContraception20087814314818672116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClelandKZhuHGoldstuckNChengLTrussellJThe efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experienceHum Reprod2012271994200022570193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrussellJLallaAMDoanQVReyesEPintoLGricarJCost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesContraception20097951419041435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HassonHMClinical studies of the Wing Sound II metrology deviceZatuchniGIGoldsmithASciarraJJIntrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future ProspectsPhiladelphiaHarper and Row1984126141
   Google Scholar
• KurzKHCavimeter uterine measurements and IUD clinical correlationZatuchniGIGoldsmithASciarraJJIntrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future ProspectsPhiladelphiaHarper and Row1984142162
   Google Scholar
• KamalIHefnawiFGhonheimMTalantMAbdallaMDimensional and architectural disproportion between the intrauterine device and the uterine cavity: a cause of bleedingFert Steril197122514521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoySCooperDMishellDRExperience with three different models of the Copper T intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous womenAm J Obstet Gynecol197411934144174827383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadelha Da CostaAFilhoFMFerreiraACSparaPMauadFMUterine volume in adolescentsUltrasound Med Biol20043071014962602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BullettiCde ZieglerDPolliVDiotalleLDel FerroEFlamigniCUterine contractility during the menstrual cycleHum Reprod200015Suppl 1818910928421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersenKRBrooksLJacobsenBSkoubySOIntrauterine devices in nulliparous womenAdv Contracept199173333381776557
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CanteiroRBahamondesVdos Santos FernandesAEspejo-ArceXMarchiNMBahamondesLLength of the endometrial cavity as measured by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different paritiesContraception20108151551920472119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZohavEAntebyEYOrvietoRUse of three-dimensional ultrasound in evaluating the intrauterine position of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemReprod Biomed Online20071449549717425833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenacerrafBRShippTDLyonsJGBromleyBWidth of the normal uterine cavity in premenopausal women and effect of parityObstet Gynecol20101162 Pt 130531020664389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDVan der PasHThieryMVan KetsHParewijckWDelbargeWThe Copper-Fix (Cu-Fix): a new concept in IUD technologyAdv Contracept198841972053071109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van KetsHVrijensMVan TrappenYThe frameless GyneFix intrauterine implant: a major improvement in efficacy, expulsion and toleranceAdv Contracept1995111311427491854
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WuSHuJWildemeerschDPerformance of the frameless GyneFix and the TCu380A IUDs in a three-year multicenter randomized comparative trial in parous womenContraception200061919810802273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDAndradeACommentary – A historical note on the development of the frameless IUDContraception20108117217620103458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaoXZhangWZhaoXThree-year efficacy and acceptability of the GyneFix 200 intrauterine deviceContraception200469207211 Erratum14969668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  Contraception20067331531716472577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDRowePJAssessment of menstrual blood loss in Belgian users of the frameless copper-releasing IUD with copper surface are of 200 mm2 and users of a copper-levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemContraception20047016917215288224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BatárIWildemeerschDVrijensMDelbargeWTemmermanMGboladeBAPreventing abortion and repeat abortion with the GyneFix intrauterine implant system – preliminary resultsAdv Contracept199814291969820927
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GboladeBAImmediate insertion of the postabortion version of the GyneFix intrauterine implant systemContemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol1999112933
   Google Scholar
• MartinezFGimenezEHernandezGExperience with GyneFix insertions in Spain: favorable acceptance of the intrauterine contraceptive implant with some limitationsContraception20026631532012443961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDThe force required to remove the frameless 0-suture anchoring system: comparison between pre- and postmenopausal womenContraception20046951351515157799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrussellJContraceptive failure in the United StatesContraception20118339740421477680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinnerBPeipertJFZhaoQEffectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptionN Engl J Med20123661998200722621627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StuartJESecuraGMZhaoQPittmanMEPeipertJFFactors associated with 12-month pill, patch, and ring usersObstet Gynecol201312133033623344283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FinerLBJermanJKavanaughMLChanges in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009Fertil Steril20129889389722795639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaimovichSProfile of long-acting reversible contraception users in EuropeEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20091418719519565416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SecuraGMAllsworthJEMaddenTMullersmanJLPeipertJFThe Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptionAm J Obstet Gynecol2010203115.e1e720541171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MestadRSecuraGAllsworthJEMaddenTZhaoQPeipertJFAcceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE ProjectContraception20118449349822018123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WellingsKZhihongZKrentelABarrettGGlasierAAttitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UKContraception20077620821417707718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaunitzAChanging the contraceptive paradigm: making long-acting methods the default optionMedscape Today2012 Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/765969Accessed March 4, 2013
   Google Scholar
• TrussellJHenryNHassanFPreziosoALawAFilonenkoABurden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraceptionContraception20138715416122959904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Congress of Obstetricians and GynecologistsCommittee opinion number 539: Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices2012 Available from: http://www.acog.org/Resources%20And%20Publications/Committee%Care/Adolescents%20and%20Long-Acting%20Reversible%20Contraception.aspxAccessed March 4, 2013
   Google Scholar
• BlumenthalPDGemzell-DanielssonKMarintcheva-PetrovaMTolerability and clinical safety of ImplanonEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care200813Suppl 1293618330815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LyusRLohrPPragerSUse of Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices for nulliparous womenContraception20108136737120399942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BahamondesMVHidalgoMMBahamondesLMonteiroIEase of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidasContraception201184e11e622018132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MarionsLLövkvistLTaubeAJohanssonMDalvikHØverlieIUse of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system in nulliparous women – a non-interventional study in SwedenEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20111612613421417562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDCopper intrauterine device used by nulliparous women:review of side effectsContraception200775S8S1117531622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatersonHAshtinJHarisson-WoolrychA nationwide cohort study of the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in New Zealand adolescentsContraception20097943343819442778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuhonenSHaukkamaaMJakobssonTRauramoIClinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative studyContraception20046940741215105064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonKOdlindVRyboGLevonorgestrel releasing and copper releasing (Nova T) IUCDs during five years of use. A randomized comparative studyContraception19944956728137626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuukkainenTAllonenHHaukkamaaMEffective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter studyContraception198736160179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiveraRChen-MokMMcMullenSAnalysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUDContraception19996015516010640159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TealSBSheederJIUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuationContraception20128527027422067773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenacerrafBRShippTDBromlyBThree-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are the source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleedingUltrasound Obstet Gynecol20093411011519565532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BraatenKPBensonCBMaurerRGoldbergABMalpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnanciesObstet Gynecol20111181014102022015868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndradeCMABarbieriMNowakPMTorloniMRAraujoFFGuazzelliCAFIs three-dimensional ultrasound better for the identification of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system?12th Congress of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health CareAthens, GreeceJune 22–23, 2012
   Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDThe effective copper surface area differs substantially between that of the frameless copper IUD and that of conventional copper IUDs: a commentJ Fam Plann Reprod Health Care2006325416492353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AndradeTLAndradeMDPizzaro OrchardEQuantitative studies on menstrual blood loss in IUD usersContraception1987361291443311622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [No authors listed]The TCu380A IUD and the frameless “FlexiGard”, interim three-year data from an international multicenter trial. UNDP, UNFPA, and WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Bank: IUD Research GroupContraception19955277838536451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MilsomIRyboGLindstedtGThe influence of copper surface area on menstrual blood loss and iron status in women fitted with an IUDContraception1990412712812323218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SivinIShaabanMOdlindVA randomized trial of the Gyne T 380 and Gyne T 380 Slimline intrauterine copper devicesContraception1990423793892257739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonKOdlindVRyboGLevonorgestrel releasing and copper releasing (Nova T) IUCDs during five years of use. A randomized comparative studyContraception19944956728137626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SivinIel MahgoubSMcCarthyTLong-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized studyContraception1990423613782124179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VickeryZMaddenTDifficult intrauterine contraception insertion in a nulligravid patientObstet Gynecol201111739139521252756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, data on fileFSRH Clinical Effectiveness Unit2009
   Google Scholar