References
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population DivisionWorld contraceptive use2011 Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htmAccessed March 26, 2014
- SkoubySOContraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countriesEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20049576815449817
- TrussellJContraceptive failure in the United StatesContraception20118339740421477680
- LopezLMGrimesDAGalloMFStocktonLLSchulzKFSkin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraceptionCochrane Database Syst Rev20134CD00355223633314
- DavieJEWallingMRMansourDJBromhamDKishenMFowlerPImpact of patient counseling on acceptance of the levonorgestrel implant contraceptive in the United KingdomClin Ther1996181501598851460
- BackmanTHuhtalaSLuotoRTuominenJRauramoIKoskenvuoMAdvance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine systemObstet Gynecol20029960861312039121
- WysockiSThe state of hormonal contraception today: enhancing clinician/patient communicationsAm J Obstet Gynecol2011205S18S2021961820
- RosenbergMWaughMSCauses and consequences of oral contraceptive noncomplianceAm J Obstet Gynecol19991802762799988830
- LeteIDovalJLPerez-CamposEFactors affecting women’s selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional studyContraception200776778317656174
- AhrendtHJNisandIBastianelliCEfficacy, acceptability and tolerability of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg of drospirenoneContraception20067445145717157101
- ArcherDFCullinsVCreasyGWFisherACThe impact of improved compliance with a weekly contraceptive transdermal system (Ortho Evra) on contraceptive efficacyContraception20046918919514969665
- OddssonKLeifels-FischerBde MeloNREfficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trialContraception20057117618215722066
- CostaARRPalmaFSáJLImpact of a women’s counselling programme on combined hormonal contraception in Portugal – The IMAGINE studyEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20111640941721942578
- BitzerJGemzell-DanielssonKRoumenFMarintcheva-PetrovaMvan BakelBOddensBJThe CHOICE study: effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countriesEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care201217657822239264
- MayWLJohnsonWDA SAS macro for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportionsComput Methods Programs Biomed1997531531629230450
- MerckxMDondersGGrandjeanPVan de SandeTWeyersSDoes structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice?Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20111641842922066890
- EgarterCFrey TirriBBitzerJWomen’s perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counselingBMC Womens Health201313923448283
- Gemzell-DanielssonKThunellLLindebergMTydenTMarintcheva-PetrovaMOddensBJComprehensive counseling about combined hormonal contraceptives changes the choice of contraceptive methods: results of the CHOICE program in SwedenActa Obstet Gynecol Scand20119086987721564028
- EgarterCGrimmCNouriKAhrendtH-JBitzerJCermakCContraceptive counselling and factors affecting women’s contraceptive choices: results of the CHOICE study in AustriaReprod Biomed Online20122469269722285247
- Merki-FeldGSGruberIMIntention to use a combined contraceptive method and choice after structured counseling in SwitzerlandEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20121711912722200096
- LindhIEllstromAABlohmFMilsomIA longitudinal study of contraception and pregnancies in the same women followed for a quarter of a centuryHum Reprod2010251415142220395219
- HardmanSMGebbieAEHormonal contraceptive regimens in the perimenopauseMaturitas20096320421219524378