Update on new technologies in digital mammography

References

• World Health Organization International Agency for Research on CancerGLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012 Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspxAccessed May 23, 2014
   Google Scholar
• NicksonCMasonKEEnglishDRKavanaghAMMammographic screening and breast cancer mortality: a case-control study and meta-analysisCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev20122191479148822956730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BleyerAWelchHGEffect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidenceN Engl J Med2012367211998200523171096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WelchHGPassowHJQuantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammographyJAMA Intern Med2014174344845424380095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PisanoEDGatsonisCHendrickEDiagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screeningN Engl J Med2005353171773178316169887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BickUDiekmannFDigital mammography: what do we and what don’t we know?Eur Radiol20071781931194217429645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HelvieMADigital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applicationsRadiol Clin North Am201048591792920868894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaeMSMoonWKChangJMBreast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammographyRadiology2014270236937724471386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlakhrasMBourneRRickardMNgKHPietrzykMBrennanPCDigital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?Clin Radiol2013685e225e23623465326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerJALoJYBreast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literatureAcad Radiol201118101298131021893296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrukteinisJSMooneyBPFlowersCIGatenbyRABeyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screeningAm J Med2013126647247923561631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoussamiNSkaanePOverview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detectionBreast201322210110823422255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeiJYangPZhangLWangYYangKDiagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysisEur Radiol201424359560224121712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BernardiDCaumoFMacaskillPEffect of integrating 3D– mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists’ true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trialEur J Cancer20145071232123824582915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkaanePBandosAIGullienRComparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programRadiology20132671475623297332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaumoFBernardiDCiattoSIncremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trialBreast2014231768024316152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoussamiNMacaskillPBernardiDBreast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D– mammography) for single-reading or double-reading – evidence to guide future screening strategiesEur J Cancer201450101799180724746887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeCILehmanCDDigital breast tomosynthesis and the challenges of implementing an emerging breast cancer screening technology into clinical practiceJ Am Coll Radiol2013101291391724295940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PisanoEDParhamCADigital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imagingRadiol Clin North Am2000384861869 x10943283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendricksERPisanoEDAverbulchAComparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trialAJR Am J Roentgenol2010194236236920093597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BloomquistAKYaffeMJPisanoEDQuality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part IMed Phys200633371973616878575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YaffeMJBloomquistAKMawdsleyGEQuality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trialMed Phys200633373775216878576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaugeIHRPedersenKSanderudAHofvindSOlerudHMPatient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programmeRadiat Prot Dosimetry20121481657321335333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AslundMCederströmBLundqvistMDanielssonMScatter rejection in multislit digital mammographyMed Phys200633493394016696469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColeEBToledanoAYLunqvistMPisanoEDComparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammographyAcad Radiol201219891692222537503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullaghJBBaldelliPPhelanNClinical dose performance of full-field digital mammography in a breast screening programmeBr J Radiol20118410071027103321586506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaldelliPMcCullaghJPhelanNFlanaganFComprehensive dose survey of breast screening in IrelandRadiat Prot Dosimetry20111451526021097483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeaveyEPhelanNO’ConnellAMComparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programmeBr J Radiol20128510161123112722096222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchellMJYankaskasBCBallard-BarbashREvidence-based target recall rates for screening mammographyRadiology2007243368168917517927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Radiology (ACR)ACR BI-RADS® mammographySicklesEAD’OrsiCJBassettLWACR BI-RADS^® Atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System5th edReston (VA)American College of Radiology2013
   Google Scholar
• StomperPCD’SouzaDJDiNittoPAArredondoMAAnalysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25–79 years oldAJR Am J Roentgenol19961675126112658911192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MandelsonMTOestreicherNPorterPLBreast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancersJ Natl Cancer Inst200092131081108710880551
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KolbTMLichyJNewhouseJHComparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluationsRadiology2002225116517512355001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoydNFGuaHMartinLJMammography density and the risk and detection of breast cancerN Engl J Med2007356322723617229950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuistDSPorterPLLehmanCTaplanSHWhiteEFactors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 yearsJ Natl Cancer Inst200496191432144015467032
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RoubidouxMABaileyJEWrayLAHelvieMAInvasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative results: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factorsRadiology20042301424814695385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KopansDBDigital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical careAJR Am J Roentgenol2014202229930824450669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NiklasonLTChristianBTNiklasonLEDigital tomosynthesis in breast imagingRadiology199720523994069356620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengSSSechopoulosIClinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterizationRadiology20122631354222332070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FörnvikDAnderssonISvahnTTimbergPZackrissonSTingbergAThe effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical casesRadiat Prot Dosimetry20101391–311812320228049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KopansDBA new era in mammography screeningRadiology2014271362963124848957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaldherrCCernyPAltermattHJValue of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screeningAJR Am J Roentgenol2013200122623123255766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GurDAbramsGSChoughDMDigital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance studyAJR Am J Roentgenol2009193258659119620460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MichellMJIqbalAWasanRKA comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesisClin Radiol2012671097698122625656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CiattoSHoussamiNBernardiDIntegration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison studyLancet Oncol201314758358923623721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama. Digital breast tomosynthesis2013 https://www.bcbsal.org/providers/policies/final/252.pdfAccessed May 29, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SpanglerMLZuleyMLSumkinJHDetection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparisonAJR Am J Roentgenol2011196232032421257882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZuleyMLGuoBCatulloVJComparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis imagesRadiology2014271366467124475859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaasBMKalraVGeiselJRaghuMDurandMPhilpottsLEComparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screeningRadiology2013269369470023901124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LupariaA1MariscottiGDurandoMAccuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRIRadiol Med201311871119193623801389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoroozianMHadjiiskiLRahnama-MoghadamSDigital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterizationRadiology20122621616821998048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendrickRERadiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studiesRadiology2010257124625320736332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GurDZuleyMLAnelloMIDose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance studyAcad Radiol201219216617122098941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkaanePBandosAIEbenEBTwo-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic imagesRadiology2014271365566324484063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanHPWeiJSahinerBComputer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experienceRadiology200523731075108016237141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DromainCBalleyguierCAdlerGGarbayJRDelalogeSContrast-enhanced digital mammographyEur J Radiol2009691344218790584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JongRAYaffeMJSkarpathiotakisMContrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experienceRadiology2003228384285012881585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DromainCBalleyguierCMullerSEvaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammographyAJR Am J Roentgenol20061875W528W53717056886
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiekmannFBickUBreast tomosynthesisSemin Ultrasound CT MR201132428128721782118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DromainCThibaultFMullerSDual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical resultsEur Radiol201121356557420839001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LewinJMIsaacsPKVanceVLarkeFJDual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibilityRadiology2003229126126812888621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JochelsonMSDershawDDSungJSBilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinomaRadiology2013266374375123220903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenSCCartonAKAlbertMConantEFSchnallMDMaidmentADInitial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesisAcad Radiol200714222923817236995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmitzbergerFFFallenbergEMLawaczeckRDevelopment of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imagingRadiology2011259255856421330558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar