Low-cost in vitro fertilization: current insights

References

• MaheshwariAScotlandGBellJMcTavishAHamiltonMBhattacharyaSThe direct health services costs of providing assisted reproduction services in overweight or obese women: a retrospective cross-sectional analysisHum Reprod200924363363919059947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceFertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems [webpage on the Internet]London, UKNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence2013 Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG156/Guidance/pdf/EnglishAccessed March 11, 2014
   Google Scholar
• AleyammaTKKamathMSMuthukumarKMangalarajAMGeorgeKAffordable ART: a different perspectiveHum Reprod201126123312331821987524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChambersGMHoangVPIllingworthPJSocioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costsHum Reprod201328113111311723906901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithJFEisenbergMLGliddenDSocioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United StatesFertil Steril20119619510121616487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RauprichOBernsEVollmannJWho should pay for assisted reproductive techniques? Answers from patients, professionals and the general public in GermanyHum Reprod20102551225123320228390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurageAMuteshiMCGithaeFAssisted reproduction services provision in a developing country: time to act?Fertil Steril201196496696821843886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakuchMYPettaCAOsisMJBahamondesLLow priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case studyHum Reprod201025243043519920065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakuchMYSimônia de PaduaKPettaCADuarte OsisMJBahamondesLInequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative studyHum Reprod20112682054206021613314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OmbeletWCookeIDyerSSerourGDevroeyPInfertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countriesHum Reprod Update200814660562118820005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DyerSJAbrahamsNMokoenaNELombardCJvan der SpuyZMPsychological distress among women suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: a quantitative assessmentHum Reprod20052071938194315774542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OmbeletWIs global access to infertility care realistic? The Walking Egg ProjectReprod Biomed Online201428326727224444813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The walking egg: global access to infertility care [homepage on the Internet]The Walking Egg2014 Available from: http://thewalkingegg.comAccessed July 27, 2014
   Google Scholar
• KamphuisEIBhattacharyaSvan der VeenFMolBWTempletonAEvidence Based IVF GroupAre we overusing IVF?BMJ2014348g25224472708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarquharCMvan den BoogaardNMRiddellCMacdonaldAChanEMolBWAccessing fertility treatment in New Zealand: a comparison of the clinical priority access criteria with a prediction model for couples with unexplained subfertilityHum Reprod201126113037304421896547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteuresPvan der SteegJWHompesPGCollaborative Effort on the Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive MedicineIntrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trialLancet2006368953121622116844491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolBWBonselGJCollinsJAWiegerinckMAvan der VeenFBossuytPMCost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization and embryo transferFertil Steril200073474875410731536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CustersIMvan RumsteMMvan der SteegJWCECERMLong-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatmentHum Reprod201227244445022114108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BhattacharyaSHarrildKMollisonJClomifene citrate or unstimulated intrauterine insemination compared with expectant management for unexplained infertility: pragmatic randomised controlled trialBMJ2008337a71618687718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TummonISAsherLJMartinJSTulandiTRandomized controlled trial of superovulation and insemination for infertility associated with minimal or mild endometriosisFertil Steril19976818129207576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarlandLVMissmerSARich-EdwardsJChavarroJEBarbieriRLGrodsteinFUse of fertility treatment modalities in a large United States cohort of professional womenFertil Steril201410161705171024746739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OjhaKPhilipsZDarneFJDiagnosing infertility in a district general hospital: a case-note and cost analysisHum Fertil (Camb)20036416917314614195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HelmerhorstFMOeiSGBloemenkampKWKeirseMJConsistency and variation in fertility investigations in EuropeHum Reprod1995108202720308567836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenkveldRWongWYLombardCJSemen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholdsHum Reprod20011661165117111387287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GunalpSOnculogluCGurganTKrugerTFLombardCJA study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholdsHum Reprod200116111011411139547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationWHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen5th edGeneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health Organization2010
   Google Scholar
• TomlinsonMJPooleyKSimpsonTValidation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithmsFertil Steril20109361911192019200972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JayaprakasanKHilwahNKendallNRDoes 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment?Hum Reprod20072271932194117493981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolBWCollinsJABurrowsEAvan der VeenFBossuytPMComparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcomeHum Reprod19991451237124210325270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerhoeveHRMoolenaarLMHompesPvan der VeenFMolBWCost-effectiveness of tubal patency testsBJOG2013120558359323331951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwartPMolBWvan der VeenFvan BeurdenMRedekopWKBossuytPMThe accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysisFertil Steril19956434864917641899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DijkmanABMolBWvan der VeenFBossuytPMHogerzeilHVCan hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility?Eur J Radiol2000351444810930765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrosensICampoRPuttemansPGordtsSOne-stop endoscopy-based infertility clinicCurr Opin Obstet Gynecol200214439740012151829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CicinelliEMatteoMCausioFSchonauerLMPintoVGalantinoPTolerability of the mini-pan-endoscopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalpingography in an outpatient infertility investigationFertil Steril20017651048105111704133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WatrelotANisolleMChelliHHockeCRongièresCRacinetCInternational Group for Fertiloscopy EvaluationIs laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the ‘FLY’ (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) studyHum Reprod200318483483912660280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EzedinmaNAPhelpsJYTransvaginal hydrolaparoscopyJSLS201216346146523318074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NardoLGFlemingRHowlesCMConventional ovarian stimulation no longer exists: welcome to the age of individualized ovarian stimulationReprod Biomed Online201123214114821665542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoolenaarLMBroekmansFJvan DisseldorpJCost effectiveness of ovarian reserve testing in in vitro fertilization: a Markov decision-analytic modelFertil Steril201196488989421868001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonSMAndersonRABroekmansFJRaine-FenningNFlemingRLa MarcaAAnti-Müllerian hormone: clairvoyance or crystal clear?Hum Reprod201227363163622238112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KelseyTWAndersonRAWrightPNelsonSMWallaceWHData-driven assessment of the human ovarian reserveMol Hum Reprod2012182798721933846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonSMBiomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applicationsFertil Steril201399496396923312225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NardoLGChristodoulouDGouldDRobertsSAFitzgeraldCTLaingIAnti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count in women enrolled in in vitro fertilization cycles: relationship to lifestyle factors, chronological age and reproductive historyGynecol Endocrinol200723848649317852428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van DisseldorpJLambalkCBKweeJComparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle countsHum Reprod201025122122719840990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeenenCLavenJSVon BerghARAnti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitmentMol Hum Reprod2004102778314742691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlemingRNelsonSMReproducibility of AMHHum Reprod2012271236393641 author reply 364123019299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VuralBCakirogluYVuralFFilizSHormonal and functional biomarkers in ovarian responseArch Gynecol Obstet201428961355136124366586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van TilborgTCEijkemansMJLavenJSThe OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trialBMC Womens Health2012122922989359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllersmaTFarquharCCantineauAENatural cycle in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for subfertile couplesCochrane Database Syst Rev20138CD01055023990351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NargundGWaterstoneJBlandJPhilipsZParsonsJCampbellSCumulative conception and live birth rates in natural (unstimulated) IVF cyclesHum Reprod200116225926211157816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IngerslevHJHøjgaardAHindkjaerJKesmodelUA randomized study comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrateHum Reprod200116469670211278221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDougallMJTanSLHallVBalenAMasonBAJacobsHSComparison of natural with clomiphene citrate-stimulated cycles in in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized trialFertil Steril1994616105210578194616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PelinckMJHoekASimonsAHHeinemanMJEfficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literatureHum Reprod Update20028212913912099628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerbergMFMacklonNSNargundGMild ovarian stimulation for IVFHum Reprod Update2009151132919091755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroenHTonchNSimonsAHvan der VeenFHoekALandJAModified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenariosHum Reprod201328123236324624166594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaartEBMartiniEEijkemansMJMilder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trialHum Reprod200722498098817204525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SillsESCollinsGSSalemSAJonesCAPeckACSalemRDBalancing selected medication costs with total number of daily injections: a preference analysis of GnRH-agonist and antagonist protocols by IVF patientsReprod Biol Endocrinol2012106722935199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoanPMFowdenALConstanciaMFerguson-SmithACBurtonGJSibleyCPDisproportional effects of Igf2 knockout on placental morphology and diffusional exchange characteristics in the mouseJ Physiol2008586Pt 205023503218755750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrounsonAOLeetonJFWoodCWebbJWoodJPregnancies in humans by fertilization in vitro and embryo transfer in the controlled ovulatory cycleScience198121244956816827221556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsRGSteptoePCPurdyJMEstablishing full-term human pregnancies using cleaving embryos grown in vitroBr J Obstet Gynaecol19808797377566775685
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HillierSGIVF endocrinology: the Edwards eraMol Hum Reprod2013191279980824113591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmitaMTakahashiTTsutsumiSMolecular mechanism of the inhibition of estradiol-induced endometrial epithelial cell proliferation by clomiphene citrateEndocrinology2010151139440519934375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiristatidisCTrivellaMChreliasCSioulasVDVrachnisNKassanosDA short narrative review of the feasibility of adopting mild ovarian stimulation for IVF as the current standard of careArch Gynecol Obstet2012286250551022546950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DhontMOnghenaACoetsierTDe SutterPProspective randomized study of clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophins versus goserelin and gonadotrophins for follicular stimulation in assisted reproductionHum Reprod19951047917967650122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinYHHwangJLSeowKMHuangLWHsiehBCTzengCRComparison of outcome of clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotropin/cetrorelix protocol and buserelin long protocol – a randomized studyGynecol Endocrinol200622629730216785154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeigertMKrischkerUPöhlMPoschalkoGKindermannCFeichtingerWComparison of stimulation with clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone to stimulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: a prospective, randomized studyFertil Steril2002781343912095487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GibreelAMaheshwariABhattacharyaSClomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilizationCochrane Database Syst Rev201211CD00852823152261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-VelascoJAMorenoLPachecoAThe aromatase inhibitor letrozole increases the concentration of intraovarian androgens and improves in vitro fertilization outcome in low responder patients: a pilot studyFertil Steril2005841828716009161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitwallyMFCasperRFAromatase inhibition reduces gonadotrophin dose required for controlled ovarian stimulation in women with unexplained infertilityHum Reprod20031881588159712871867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrabiaAPapierSPesceRMlayesLKopelmanSSueldoCPreliminary experience with a low-cost stimulation protocol that includes letrozole and human menopausal gonadotropins in normal responders for assisted reproductive technologiesFertil Steril20068641026102816935285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerpoestWMKolibianakisEPapanikolaouESmitzJVan SteirteghemADevroeyPAromatase inhibitors in ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: a pilot studyReprod Biomed Online200613216617216895628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoswamiSKDasTChattopadhyayRA randomized single-blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a preliminary reportHum Reprod20041992031203515217999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MastenbroekSTwiskMvan der VeenFReppingSPreimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTsHum Reprod Update201117445446621531751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuZZhangXLeungCEsfandiariNCasperRFSunYRobotic ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection)IEEE Trans Biomed Eng20115872102210821521663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontagMTothBStrowitzkiTNew approaches to embryo selectionReprod Biomed Online201327553954623933036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HardarsonTAhlströmARogbergLNon-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: a prospective randomized trialHum Reprod2012271899622068638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LópezGLafuenteRChecaMACarrerasRBrassescoMDiagnostic value of sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm high-magnification for predicting outcome of assisted reproduction treatmentAsian J Androl201315679079423912311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeandriRDGachetAPfefferJIs intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) beneficial in the first ART cycle? a multicentric randomized controlled trialAndrology20131569269723788532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlerckxEIVF for 200 euro per cycle: first real-life proof of principle that IVF is feasible and effective for developing countries [press release]London, UKEuropean Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology782013 Available from: http://www.eshre.eu/Londen2013/Media/Releases/Elke-Klerckx.aspxAccessed July 4, 2014
   Google Scholar
• TaymorMLRanouxCJGrossGLNatural oocyte retrieval with intravaginal fertilization: a simplified approach to in vitro fertilizationObstet Gynecol19928058888911407935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van BlerkomJOmbeletWKlerkxEFirst births with a simplified culture system for clinical IVF and embryo transferReprod Biomed Online201428331032024456702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlperMMBrinsdenPRFischerRWiklandMIs your IVF programme good?Hum Reprod200217181011756353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LassABrinsdenPHow do patients choose private in vitro fertilization treatment? A customer survey in a tertiary fertility center in the United KingdomFertil Steril200175589389711334900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsRGLoboRBouchardPTime to revolutionize ovarian stimulationHum Reprod19961159179198671358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsRGIVF, IVM, natural cycle IVF, minimal stimulation IVF – time for a rethinkReprod Biomed Online200715110611917623547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YokoyamaYShimizuTHayakawaKIncidence of handicaps in multiple births and associated factorsActa Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)199544281918750772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PharoahPOCookeTCerebral palsy and multiple birthsArch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed1996753F174F1778976682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KällénBFinnströmOLindamANilssonENygrenKGOlaussonPOSelected neonatal outcomes in dizygotic twins after IVF versus non-IVF pregnanciesBJOG2010117667668220184569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LedgerWLAnumbaDMarlowNThomasCMWilsonECCost of Multiple Births Study Group (COMBS Group)The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UKBJOG20061131212516398766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLernonDJHarrildKBerghCClinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trialsBMJ2010341c694521177530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChambersGMIllingworthPJSullivanEAAssisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in AustraliaMed J Aust20111951059459822107009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChambersGMSullivanEAIshiharaOChapmanMGAdamsonGDThe economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countriesFertil Steril20099162281229419481642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WidgeASeeking conception: experiences of urban Indian women with in vitro fertilisationPatient Educ Couns200559322623316326264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HuyserCBoydLART in South Africa: The price to payFacts Views Vis Obgyn201352919924753934
   PubMedGoogle Scholar