Clinical challenges in the management of vaginal prolapse

References

• NygaardIBarberMDBurgioKLPrevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US womenJAMA2008300111311131618799443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NygaardIBradleyCBrandtDPelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factorsObstet Gynecol2004104348949715339758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JelovsekJEBarberMDWomen seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of lifeAm J Obstet Gynecol200619451455146116647928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JelovsekJEMaherCBarberMDPelvic organ prolapseLancet200736995661027103817382829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendrixSLClarkANygaardIAragakiABarnabeiVMcTiernanAPelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidityAm J Obstet Gynecol6200218661160116612066091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwiftSWoodmanPO’BoyleAPelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defectsAm J Obstet Gynecol2005192379580615746674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlsenALSmithVJBergstromJOCollingJCClarkALEpidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinenceObstet Gynecol19978945015069083302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoylesSHWeberAMMeynLProcedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997Am J Obstet Gynecol2003188110811512548203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuJMKawasakiAHundleyAFDieterAAMyersERSungVWPredicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050Am J Obstet Gynecol20112053230. e1e521600549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EreksonEALopesVVRakerCASungVWAmbulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United StatesAm J Obstet Gynecol20102035497. e1e520739015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SubakLLWaetjenLEvan den EedenSThomDHVittinghoffEBrownJSCost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United StatesObstet Gynecol200198464665111576582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllerkmannRMCundiffGWMelickCFNihiraMALefflerKBentAECorrelation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapseAm J Obstet Gynecol2001185613321337 discussion 1337–133811744905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwiftSETateSBNicholasJCorrelation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse?Am J Obstet Gynecol20031892372377 discussion 377–37914520198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarberMDBrubakerLNygaardIDefining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapseObstet Gynecol2009114360060919701041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanJSLukaczESMenefeeSAPowellCRNagerCWPredictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database studyInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2005163203209 discussion 20915875236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClemonsJLAguilarVCSokolERJacksonNDMyersDLPatient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 yearAm J Obstet Gynecol2004191115916415295358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClemonsJLAguilarVCTillinghastTAJacksonNDMyersDLRisk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapseAm J Obstet Gynecol2004190234535014981372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BadenWFWalkerTAGenesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxationClin Obstet Gynecol1972154104810544649139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BumpRCMattiassonABoKThe standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunctionAm J Obstet Gynecol1996175110178694033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallAFTheofrastousJPCundiffGWInterobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification systemAm J Obstet Gynecol1996175614671470 discussion 1470–14618987926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KobakWHRosenbergerKWaltersMDInterobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapseInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct1996731211248913828
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MuirTWSteppKJBarberMDAdoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literatureAm J Obstet Gynecol2003189616321635 discussion 1635–163614710089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RooneyKKentonKMuellerERFitzGeraldMPBrubakerLAdvanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapseAm J Obstet Gynecol200619561837184017132485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaltersMDRidgewayBMSurgical treatment of vaginal apex prolapseObstet Gynecol20131212 Pt 135437423344287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZebedeSSmithALPlowrightLNHegdeAAguilarVCDavilaGWObliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly womenObstet Gynecol20131212 Pt 127928423344277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaherCFQatawnehAMBaesslerKSchluterPJMidline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecationObstet Gynecol2004104468568915458886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarksBKGoldmanHBWhat is the gold standard for posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: mesh or native tissue?Curr Urol Rep201213321622122528115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParaisoMFBarberMDMuirTWWaltersMDRectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentationAm J Obstet Gynecol200619561762177117132479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CareyMHiggsPGohJVaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trialBJOG2009116101380138619583714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaherCFeinerBBaesslerKSchmidCSurgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in womenCochrane Database Syst Rev20134CD00401423633316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SungVWRogersRGSchafferJIGraft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic reviewObstet Gynecol200811251131114218978116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeberAMWaltersMDPiedmonteMRBallardLAAnterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniquesAm J Obstet Gynecol2001185612991304 discussion 1304–129611744900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChmielewskiLWaltersMDWeberAMBarberMDReanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of successAm J Obstet Gynecol2011205169. e1e821545996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrispCCBookNMSmithALBody image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisisAm J Obstet Gynecol Epub592013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzgeraldMPRichterHEBradleyCSPelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisisInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct200819121603160918690402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganDMRogersMAHuebnerMWeiJTDelanceyJOHeterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic reviewObstet Gynecol200710961424143317540817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarguliesRURogersMAMorganDMOutcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysisAm J Obstet Gynecol2010202212413420113690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdenfieldALAmundsenCLWeidnerACWuJMGeorgeASiddiquiNYVaginal prolapse recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight and obese womenObstet Gynecol2013121355455923635618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiddiquiNYMitchellTRBentleyRCWeidnerACNeural entrapment during uterosacral ligament suspension: an anatomic study of female cadaversObstet Gynecol2010116370871320733456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon YbarraMAGutmanRERiniDHandaVLEtiology of post-uterosacral suspension neuropathiesInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct20092091067107119399353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlynnMKWeidnerACAmundsenCLSensory nerve injury after uterosacral ligament suspensionAm J Obstet Gynecol200619561869187217014812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontoyaTILuebbehusenHISchafferJIWaiCYRahnDDCortonMMSensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligamentsInt Urogynecol J201223121735174022588137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarberMDBrubakerLMenefeeSOperations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methodsContemp Clin Trials200930217818919130903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NygaardIEMcCreeryRBrubakerLAbdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive reviewObstet Gynecol2004104480582315458906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NygaardIBrubakerLZyczynskiHMLong-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapseJAMA2013309192016202423677313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CulliganPJSalamonCPriestleyJLShariatiAPorcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trialObstet Gynecol2013121114315123262939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AltmanDAnzenBBrismarSLopezAZetterströmJLong-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic meshUrology200667471972416566983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeprestJDe RidderDRooversJPWerbrouckECoremansGClaerhoutFMedium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts compared to synthetic graftsJ Urol200918252362236819762041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CulliganPJBlackwellLGoldsmithLJGrahamCARogersAHeitMHA randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexyObstet Gynecol20051061293715994614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CundiffGWVarnerEViscoAGRisk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexyAm J Obstet Gynecol20081996688. e1e518976976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GellerEJSiddiquiNYWuJMViscoAGShort-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexyObstet Gynecol200811261201120619037026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HsiaoKCLatchamsettyKGovierFEKozlowskiPKobashiKCComparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapseJ Endourol200721892693017867956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhanAAlperinMWuNComparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among Medicare beneficiariesInt Urogynecol J201324111883189123652338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiddiquiNYGellerEJViscoAGSymptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexyAm J Obstet Gynecol201220654351522397900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreemanRMPantazisKThomsonAA randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS studyInt Urogynecol J201324337738422864764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PloumidisASpinoitAFNaeyerGDRobot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institutionEur Urol EpubJune112013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GellerEJLinFCMatthewsCAAnalysis of robotic performance times to improve operative efficiencyJ Minim Invasive Gynecol2013201434823141423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson FunkMEdenfieldALPateVViscoAGWeidnerACWuJMTrends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapseAm J Obstet Gynecol2013208179. e1e723159692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug AdministrationUpdate on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse2011 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm262435.htmAccessed July 13, 2011
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug AdministrationUrogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse2011 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/UCM262760.pdfAccessed October 31, 2013
   Google Scholar
• AbedHRahnDDLowensteinLBalkEMClemonsJLRogersRGIncidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic reviewInt Urogynecol J201122778979821424785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiwadkarGBBarberMDFeinerBMaherCJelovsekJEComplication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic reviewObstet Gynecol20091132 Pt 136737319155908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VuMKLetkoJJirscheleKMinimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomesInt Urogynecol J201223121753176122531956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkStudy of uterine prolapse procedures – randomized trial (SUPeR) Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01802281. NLM identifier: NCT01802281Accessed October 31, 2013
   Google Scholar
• American Urogynecologic SocietyInformed Consent Toolkit2012 Available from: http://www.augs.org/p/cm/ld/fid=174Accessed October 31, 2013
   Google Scholar
• BrubakerLCundiffGWFinePAbdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinenceN Engl J Med2006354151557156616611949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeiJTNygaardIRichterHEA midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repairN Engl J Med2012366252358236722716974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgahJCodyDJRogersonLMinimally invasive synthetic subure-thral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane reviewNeurourol Urodyn201130328429121412819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JelovsekJEBarberMDParaisoMFWaltersMDFunctional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinenceAm J Obstet Gynecol200519362105211116325624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AryaLANoviJMShaunikAMorganMABradleyCSPelvic organ prolapse, constipation, and dietary fiber intake in women: a case-control studyAm J Obstet Gynecol200519251687169115902178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaksEKHarvieHSAsfawTSAryaLAClinical significance of obstructive defecatory symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapseInt J Gynaecol Obstet2010111323724020817179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BradleyCSNygaardIEBrownMBBowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexyAm J Obstet Gynecol20071976642. e1e818060963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustilo-AshbyAMParaisoMFJelovsekJEWaltersMDBarberMDBowel symptoms 1 year after surgery for prolapse: further analysis of a randomized trial of rectocele repairAm J Obstet Gynecol2007197176. e1e517618766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar