Ten-year literature review of global endometrial ablation with the NovaSure® device

References

• Committee on Practice Bulletins – GynecologyPractice bulletin 128: diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged womenObstet Gynecol2012120119720622914421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DaviesAHartRMagosAHadadEMorrisRHysterectomy: surgical route and complicationsEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2002104214815112206928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganHAdvinculaAPGlobal endometrial ablation: a modern day solution to an age-old problemInt J Gynaecol Obstet200694215616616769073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Practice Bulletins—GynecologyPractice Bulletin 81. Endometrial ablationObstet Gynecol200710951233124817470612
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KalkatRKCartmillRSNovaSure endometrial ablation under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting: an observational studyJ Obstet Gynaecol201131215215521281033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PenninxJPMolBWBongersMYEndometrial ablation with paracervical blockJ Reprod Med2009541061762020677480
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological HealthP970021 ThermaChoice® Uterine Balloon Therapy System Approval12121997 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/devicesatfda/index.cfm?db=pma&id=1645Accessed on January 6, 2014
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological HealthP000032 Her Option™ Uterine Cryoblation Therapy™ System Approval Letter4202001 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P000032A.pdfAccessed on January 6, 2014
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological HealthP000040 Hydro ThermAblator® Endometrial Ablation System Approval Letter4202001 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P000040a.pdfAccessed on January 6, 2014
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological HealthP010013 NovaSure™ Impedance Controlled Endometrial Ablation System Approval Letter9282001 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P010013a.pdfAccessed on January 6, 2014
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological HealthP020031 Microsulis Microwave Endometrial Ablation (MEA) System Approval Letter9232003 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf2/P020031a.pdfAccessed on January 6, 2014
   Google Scholar
• CooperJGimpelsonRLabergePA randomized, multicenter trial of safety and efficacy of the NovaSure system in the treatment of menorrhagiaJ Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc20029441842812386350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZarekSSharpHTGlobal endometrial ablation devicesClin Obstet Gynecol200851116717518303511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AsgariZMoiniASamieeHTehranianAMozafar-JalaliSSabetSEndometrial ablation with the NovaSure system in IranInt J Gynaecol Obstet20111141737521507403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaskettTFCloughHScottTANovaSure bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation: report of 200 casesJ Obstet Gynaecol Can200527547347616100642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BusundBErnoLEGrønmarkAIstreOEndometrial ablation with NovaSure GEA, a pilot studyActa Obstet Gynecol Scand2003821656812580843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FulopTRákócziIBarnaINovaSure impedance-controlled endometrial ablation: long-term follow-up resultsJ Minim Invasive Gynecol2007141859017218236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallinatANovaSure impedance-controlled system for endometrial ablation: three-year follow-up on 107 patientsAm J Obstet Gynecol200419151585158915547528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallinatAAn impedance-controlled system for endometrial ablation: five-year follow-up of 107 patientsJ Reprod Med200752646747217694962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallinatANugentWNovaSure impedance-controlled system for endometrial ablationJ Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc20029328328912101323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BongersMYBourdrezPMolBWHeintzAPBrölmannHARandomised controlled trial of bipolar radio-frequency endometrial ablation and balloon endometrial ablationBJOG2004111101095110215383112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KleijnJHEngelsRBourdrezPMolBWBongersMYFive-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial comparing NovaSure and ThermaChoice endometrial ablationBJOG2008115219319817617188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkTJSamuelsNMalickSMiddletonLDanielsJGuptaJBipolar radiofrequency compared with thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomized controlled trialObstet Gynecol20111175122821705927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbbottJHaweJHunterDGarryRA double-blind randomized trial comparing the Cavaterm and the NovaSure endometrial ablation systems for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleedingFertil Steril200380120320812849825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PenninxJPMolBWEngelsRBipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation compared with hydrothermablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a randomized controlled trialObstet Gynecol2010116481982620859144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PenninxJPHermanMCMolBWBongersMYFive-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagiaObstet Gynecol201111861287129222105257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DanielsJPMiddletonLJChampaneriaRInternational Heavy Menstrual Bleeding IPD Meta-analysis Collaborative GroupSecond generation endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding: network meta-analysisBMJ2012344e256422529302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LabergePYSabbahRFortinCGallinatAAssessment and comparison of intraoperative and postoperative pain associated with NovaSure and ThermaChoice endometrial ablation systemsJ Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc200310222323212732777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LukesASMcBrideRJHerringAHFriedMSherwaniADellDImproved premenstrual syndrome symptoms after NovaSure endometrial ablationJ Minim Invasive Gynecol201118560761121872168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElmardiAFuraraSKhanFHamzaMNovaSure impedance controlled system for endometrial ablation: the experience of the first UK reference centreJ Obstet Gynaecol200929541942219603322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SabbahRDesaulniersGUse of the NovaSure Impedance-Controlled Endometrial Ablation System in patients with intracavitary disease: 12-month follow-up results of a prospective, single-arm clinical studyJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200613546747116962534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhanZEl-NasharSAHopkinsMRFamuyideAOEfficacy and safety of global endometrial ablation after cesarean delivery: a cohort studyAm J Obstet Gynecol20112055450.e1e421907960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RooneyKECholhanHJVesico-uterine fistula after endometrial ablation in a woman with prior cesarean deliveriesObstet Gynecol20101152 Pt 245045120093876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EvantashEVesico-uterine fistula after endometrial ablation in a woman with prior cesarean deliveriesObstet Gynecol20101154869 Available from: http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2010/04000/Corrections.38.aspxAccessed January 17, 201420308858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-NasharSAHopkinsMRFeitozaSSGlobal endometrial ablation for menorrhagia in women with bleeding disordersObstet Gynecol200710961381138717540811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-NasharSAHopkinsMRBarnesSAHealth-related quality of life and patient satisfaction after global endometrial ablation for menorrhagia in women with bleeding disorders: a follow-up survey and systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol20102024348.e1e720060089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeuwirthRSLofferFDTrenhaileTLevinBThe incidence of endometrial cancer after endometrial ablation in a low-risk populationJ Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc200411449249415701191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KroghRALauszusFFGuttormERasmussenKSurgery and cancer after endometrial resection. Long-term follow-up on menstrual bleeding and hormone treatment by questionnaire and registryArch Gynecol Obstet2009280691191619294397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValleRFBaggishMSEndometrial carcinoma after endometrial ablation: high-risk factors predicting its occurrenceAm J Obstet Gynecol19981793 Pt 15695729757952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlHilliMMHopkinsMRFamuyideAOEndometrial cancer after endometrial ablation: systematic review of medical literatureJ Minim Invasive Gynecol201118339340021545966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoJSPickersgillAPregnancy after endometrial ablation: English literature review and case reportJ Minim Invasive Gynecol2006132889116527708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithSEBacher-LindLPregnancy outcomes following a NovaSure® endometrial ablation procedureJ Minim Invasive Gynecol2012196S21
   Google Scholar
• GurtcheffSESharpHTComplications associated with global endometrial ablation: the utility of the MAUDE databaseObstet Gynecol200310261278128214662215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della BadiaCNyirjesyPAtoghoAEndometrial ablation devices: review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience databaseJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200714443644117630160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NovaSure Impedance-controlled Endometrial Ablation System: Instructions for Use and Controller’s ManualMarlborough, MAHologic, Inc2010
   Google Scholar
• BrownJBlankKMinimally invasive endometrial ablation device complications and use outside of the manufacturers’ instructionsObstet Gynecol2012120486587022996104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – GynecologyACOG practice bulletin No 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic proceduresObstet Gynecol200911351180118919384149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCauslandAMMcCauslandVMLong-term complications of endometrial ablation: cause, diagnosis, treatment and preventionJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200714439940617630156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [No authors listed]A Scottish audit of hysteroscopic surgery for menorrhagia: complications and follow up. Scottish Hysteroscopy Audit GroupBr J Obstet Gynaecol199510232492547794852
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OvertonCHargreavesJMareshMA national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques – Laser, EndoThermal or EndorescetionBr J Obstet Gynaecol199710412135113599422012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar