80
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility® monitor with ultrasound in infertile women

, &
Pages 657-662 | Published online: 16 Jul 2014

References

  • World Health OrganizationReport of the Meeting on the Prevention of Infertility at the Primary Health Care LevelGeneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health Organization1983
  • BehreHMKuhlageJGassnerCPrediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurementsHum Reprod200015122478248211098014
  • SchmutzlerRKDiedrichKKrebsDValue of the Clearplan ovulation test in sterility treatmentGeburtshilfe Frauenheilkd1995555266269 German7607383
  • FreundlGBremmeMFrank-HerrmannPBaurSGodehardtESottongUThe CUE Fertility Monitor compared with ultrasound and LH peak measurements for fertile time ovulation detectionAdv Contracept19961221111218863906
  • FreundlGFrank-HerrmannPBremmeMResults of an efficacy-finding study (EFS) with the computer-thermometer Cyclotest 2 plus containing 207 cyclesAdv Contracept199814420120710075289
  • FreundlGFrank-HerrmannPGodehardtERetrospective clinical trial of contraceptive effectiveness of the electronic fertility indicator Ladycomp/BabycompAdv Contracept1998142971089820928
  • National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health 2004 Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/resources/guidance-fertility-pdfAccessed July 7, 2014
  • LeaderAWisemanDTaylorPJThe prediction of ovulation: a comparison of the basal body temperature graph, cervical mucus score, and real-time pelvic ultrasonographyFertil Steril19854333853883884396
  • GuidaMTommaselliGAPalombaSEfficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning programFertil Steril199972590090410560997
  • ChausiauxOHayesJLongCPregnancy prognosis in infertile couples on the DuoFertility® programme compared with IVF/ICSIEur J Obstet Gynaecol2011629294
  • MetcalfeSCEvansJAA study of the relationship between routine ultrasound quality assurance parameters and subjective operator image assessmentBr J Radiol1992657755705751515892
  • CatalanoMFSivakMVBedfordRAObserver variation and reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasonographyGastrointest Endosc19954121151207720997
  • R Development Core TeamA Language and Environment for Statistical ComputingVienna, AustriaR Foundation for Statistical Computing2009
  • BrownLDCaiTTDasGuptaAInterval estimation for a binomial proportionStat Sci200116221012133
  • WilsonEBProbable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inferenceJ Am Statist Assoc192722158209212
  • GerrisJDe SutterPSelf-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET): a step towards more patient-centred ART? Hum Reprod201025356256820008887
  • Raine-FenningNJayaprakasanKClewesJSonoAVC: a novel method of automatic volume calculationUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200831669169618484679
  • LenziALombardoFSalaconePGandiniLJanniniEAStress, sexual dysfunctions, and male infertilityJ Endocrinol Invest200326Suppl 3727612834026
  • SeveryLJRobinsonJFindley-KleinCMcNultyJAcceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamicsContraception2006731657116371298
  • EichnerSFTimpeEMUrinary-based ovulation and pregnancy: point-of-care testingAnn Pharmacother200438232533114742773
  • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive MedicineOptimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion Available from: http://www.sart.org/uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Practice_Guidelines/Committee_Opinions/optimizing_natural_fertility(1).pdfAccessed June 10, 2014