Use of frameless intrauterine devices and systems in young nulliparous and adolescent women: results of a multicenter study

References

• FarleyTMRosenbergMJRowePJChenJHMeirikOIntrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspectiveLancet19923397857881347812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDLara-RicaldeRTaylorDJGuerra-InfanteFGuzman-RodriguezRUse of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid womenN Engl J Med200134556156711529209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HassonHMClinical studies of the Wing Sound II metrology deviceZatuchniGIGoldsmithASciarraJJIntrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future ProspectsPhiladelphia, PA, USAHarper and Row1984126141
   Google Scholar
• KurzKHCavimeter uterine measurements and IUD clinical correlationZatuchniGIGoldsmithASciarraJJIntrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future ProspectsPhiladelphia, PA, USAHarper and Row1984142162
   Google Scholar
• KamalIHefnawiFGhonheimMTalantMAbdallaMDimensional and architectural disproportion between the intrauterine device and the uterine cavity: a cause of bleedingFertil Steril1971225145215164979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoldstuckNAssessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and eventsAfr J Reprod Health201216129138
   Google Scholar
• TatumHJConnellEBIntrauterine devicesFilshieMGuillebaudJContraception: Science and PracticeLondon, UKButterworths1989
   Google Scholar
• BenacerrafBRShippTDLyonsJGBromleyBWidth of the normal uterine cavity in premenopausal women and effect of parityObstet Gynecol201011630531020664389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrussellJContraceptive failure in the United StatesContraception20118339740421477680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDBatárIAffandiBThe ‘frameless’ intrauterine system for long term, reversible contraception: a review of 15 years of clinical experienceJ Obstet Gynaecol Res20032916016912841700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDPettAJandiSHasskampTRowePVrijensMPrecision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devicesInt J Women’s Health2013521522523658502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CaoXZhangWZhaoXThree-year efficacy and acceptability of the GyneFix 200 intrauterine deviceContraception200469207211 Erratum. Contraception. 2006;73:315–31714969668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDAndradeAReview of clinical experience with the frameless LNG-IUS for contraception and treatment of heavy menstrual bleedingGynecol Endocrinol20102638338920192899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationMedical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use3rd edGeneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health Organization2004 Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241547710/en/Accessed May 29, 2014
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team RA language and environment for statistical computingR Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna, Austria2013 Available from: http://www.R-project.orgAccessed May 29, 2014
   Google Scholar
• TietzeCLewitSRecommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraceptionStud Fam Plann1972435424691024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarleyTMMLife-table methods for contraceptive researchStat Med198654754893538263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsCommittee opinion number 539: Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices2012 Available from: https://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Adolescent_Health_Care/Adolescents_and_Long-Acting_Reversible_ContraceptionAccessed May 29, 2014
   Google Scholar
• WinnerBPeipertJFZhaoQEffectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptionN Engl J Med20123661998200722621627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaunitzAChanging the contraceptive paradigm: making long-acting methods the default optionMedscape Today2012 Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/765969Accessed March 4, 2013
   Google Scholar
• LyusRLohrPPragerSUse of Mirena™ LNG-IUS and Paragard™ CuT380A intrauterine devices for nulliparous womenContraception20108136737120399942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrussellJHenryNHassanFPreziosoALawAFilonenkoABurden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraceptionContraception20138715416122959904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MestadRSecuraGAllsworthJEMaddenTZhaoQPeipertJFAcceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE ProjectContraception20118449349822018123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDCopper intrauterine device used by nulliparous women: review of side effectsContraception200775S8S1117531622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatersonHAshtinJHarrison-WoolrychMA nationwide cohort study of the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in New Zealand adolescentsContraception20097943343819442778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuhonenSHaukkamaaMJakobssonTRauramoIClinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative studyContraception20046940741215105064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TealSBSheederJIUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuationContraception20128527027422067773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrockmeyerAKishenMWebbAExperience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women – a pilot studyEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20081324825418821462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarbersSHaines-StephanJLiptonYMeserveASpielerLChiassonMAContinuation of copper-containing intrauterine devices at 6 monthsContraception20138710110623083530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerensonABTanAHirthJMWilkinsonGSComplications and continuation of intrauterine device use among commercially insured teenagersObstet Gynecol201312195195823635730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RasheedSMAbdelmonemAMComplications among adolescents using copper intrauterine contraceptive devicesInt J Gynaecol Obstet201111526927221872240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AounJDinesVAStovallDWMeteMNelsonCBGomez-LoboVEffects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devicesObstet Gynecol201412358559224499755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShippTDBromleyBBenacerrafBRThe width of the uterine cavity is narrower in patients with an embedded intrauterine device (IUD) compared to a normally positioned IUDJ Ultrasound Med2010291453145620876899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero-FloresJBGuerrero-CarrenoFJVazquez-EstradaLAA comparative randomized study of three different IUDs in nulliparous Mexican womenContraception20036727327612684147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaislasuoJpresentationProgram of the 39th Nordic Congress of Obstetrics and GynecologyJune 10–12, 2014Stockholm, Sweden
   Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDThe effective copper surface area differs substantially between that of the frameless copper IUD and that of conventional copper IUDs: a commentJ Fam Plann Reprod Health Care2006325416492353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RaineTRFoster-RosalesAUpadhyayUDOne-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptivesObstet Gynecol201111736337121252751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EspeyEOgburnTLong-acting reversible contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implantObstet Gynecol201111770571921343774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar