The influence of clinical equipoise and patient preferences on outcomes of conservative manual interventions for spinal pain: an experimental study

Mark D Bishop1 Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida;2 Center for Pain Research and Behavioral HealthCorrespondence[email protected]

Joel E Bialosky1 Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida;2 Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health;3 Brooks-PHHP Research Collaboration, Gainesville, FL, USA

Charles W Penza1 Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida;2 Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health

Jason M Beneciuk1 Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida;3 Brooks-PHHP Research Collaboration, Gainesville, FL, USA

Meryl J Alappattu1 Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida;2 Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health

Pages 965-972 | Published online: 26 Apr 2017

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

BishopMDMintkenPEBialoskyJEClelandJAPatient expectations of benefit from interventions for neck pain and resulting influence on outcomesJ Orthop Sports Phys Ther201343745746523508341
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BishopMDBialoskyJEClelandJAPatient expectations of benefit from common interventions for low back pain and effects on outcome: secondary analysis of a clinical trial of manual therapy interventionsJ Man Manip Ther2011191202522294850
PubMedGoogle Scholar
PuenteduraEJClelandJALandersMRMintkenPELouwAFernandez-de-Las-PenasCDevelopment of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from thrust joint manipulation to the cervical spineJ Orthop Sports Phys Ther201242757759222585595
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrewinCRBradleyCPatient preferences and randomised clinical trialsBMJ198929966943133152504416
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EiringOLandmarkBFAasESalkeldGNylennaMNytroenKWhat matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disordersBMJ201554e007848
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MillerFGBrodyHA critique of clinical equipoise: therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trialsHastings Cent Rep20033331928
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CookCSheetsCClinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trialsJ Man Manip Ther2011191555722294855
PubMedGoogle Scholar
CookCLearmanKShowalterCKabbazVO’HalloranBEarly use of thrust manipulation versus non-thrust manipulation: a randomized clinical trialMan Ther201318319119823040656
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BishopMDHornMEGeorgeSZRobinsonMESelf-reported pain and disability outcomes from an endogenous model of muscular back painBMC Musculoskelet Disord2011123521288349
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
NCCIHMind and Body PracticesBethesda, MDNCCIH2015
Google Scholar
MonroeCMThe effects of therapeutic touch on painJ Holist Nurs2009272859219299529
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ManciniFNashTIannettiGDHaggardPPain relief by touch: a quantitative approachPain2014155363564224361816
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JensenMPKarolyPBraverSThe measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methodsPain19862711171263785962
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ParsonsSHardingGBreenAThe influence of patients’ and primary care practitioners’ beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studiesClin J Pain2007231919817277650
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CarrollLJLisAWeiserSTortiJHow well do you expect to recover, and what does recovery mean, anyway? Qualitative study of expectations after a musculoskeletal injuryPhys Ther201696679780726586855
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MainCJFosterNBuchbinderRHow important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain?Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol201024220521720227642
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FrancoMRFerreiraMLFerreiraPHMaherCGPintoRZCherkinDCMethodological limitations prevent definitive conclusions on the effects of patients’ preferences in randomized clinical trials evaluating musculoskeletal conditionsJ Clin Epidem2013666586598
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KlojgaardMEMannicheCPedersenLBBechMSogaardRPatient preferences for treatment of low back pain-a discrete choice experimentValue Health201417439039624968999
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BialoskyJEBishopMDPriceDDRobinsonMEGeorgeSZThe mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive modelMan Ther200914553153819027342
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KalauokalaniDCherkinDCShermanKJKoepsellTDDeyoRALessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effectsSpine200126131418142411458142
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MyersSSPhillipsRSDavisRBPatient expectations as predictors of outcome in patients with acute low back painJ Gen Intern Med200823214815318066631
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MulleyAGTrimbleCElwynGStop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matterBMJ2012345e657223137819
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LateefFPatient expectations and the paradigm shift of care in emergency medicineJ Emerg Trauma Shock20114216316721769199
PubMedGoogle Scholar
GeorgeSZRobinsonMEPreference, expectation, and satisfaction in a clinical trial of behavioral interventions for acute and sub-acute low back painJ Pain201011111074108220466596
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VaseLRobinsonMEVerneGNPriceDDThe contributions of suggestion, desire, and expectation to placebo effects in irritable bowel syndrome patients. An empirical investigationPain20031051–2172514499416
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PolloAAmanzioMArslanianACasadioCMaggiGBenedettiFResponse expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevancePain2001931778411406341
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

The influence of clinical equipoise and patient preferences on outcomes of conservative manual interventions for spinal pain: an experimental study

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

The influence of clinical equipoise and patient preferences on outcomes of conservative manual interventions for spinal pain: an experimental study

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date