References
- KohnenTCompromised corneal endothelium and cataract: how should we decide?J Cataract Refract Surg20113781377137821782081
- LiuYZengMLiuXTorsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical studyJ Cataract Refract Surg200733228729217276271
- ZengMLiuXLiuYTorsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extractionBr J Ophthalmol20089281092109618567650
- DavisonJACumulative tip travel and implied followability of longitudinal and torsional phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg200834698699018499006
- MiyoshiTYoshidaHUltra-high-speed digital video images of vibrations of an ultrasonic tip and phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg20083461024102818499013
- WilczynskiMDrobniewskiISynderAOmuleckiWEvaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsificationEur J Ophthalmol200616679880317191184
- WerblinTPLong-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification: model for evaluating endothelial damage after intraocular surgeryRefract Corneal Surg19939129358481370
- MencucciRPonchiettiCVirgiliGGiansantiFMenchiniUCorneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: microincision versus standard techniqueJ Cataract Refract Surg20063281351135416863974
- Storr-PaulsenANorregaardJCFarikGTarnhojJThe influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: a prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelasticsActa Ophthalmol Scand200785218318717305732
- HayashiKYoshidaMManabeSHirataACataract surgery in eyes with low corneal endothelial cell densityJ Cataract Refract Surg20113781419142521684110
- LucenaDRRibeiroMSMessiasABicasHEScottIUJorgeRComparison of corneal changes after phacoemulsification using BSS Plus versus Lactated Ringer’s irrigating solution: a prospective randomised trialBr J Ophthalmol201195448548920584708
- ChylackLTJrWolfeJKSingerDMThe Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study GroupArch Ophthalmol199311168318368512486
- PrakashPKasabyHEAggarwalRKHumfreySMicroincision bimanual phacoemulsification and Thinoptx implantation through a 1.70 mm incisionEye (Lond)200721217718216710439
- TsuneokaHShibaTTakahashiYUltrasonic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical resultsJ Cataract Refract Surg2002281818611777714
- DonnenfeldEDOlsonRJSolomonREfficacy and wound-temperature gradient of whitestar phacoemulsification through a 1.2 mm incisionJ Cataract Refract Surg20032961097110012842674
- AlioJRodriguez-PratsJLGalalARamzyMOutcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsificationOphthalmology2005112111997200316183129
- ReuschelABogatschHBarthTWiedemannRComparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg201036111855186121029892
- Storr-PaulsenANorregaardJCAhmedSStorr-PaulsenTPedersenTHEndothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop techniqueJ Cataract Refract Surg2008346996100018499008
- VasavadaVRajSMVasavadaARIntraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational studyJ Cataract Refract Surg20073361019102417531697
- LeeKMKwonHGJooCKMicrocoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm systemJ Cataract Refract Surg200935587488019393887
- BerdahlJPJunBDeStafenoJJKimTComparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract woundsJ Cataract Refract Surg200834122091209519027565