Effect of Contact Lens Solutions in Stabilizing the Activity of Tear Lysozyme

References

• biologyonline.com. Homeostasis; 2022. Available from: https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/homeostasis. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Brennan NA, Bright FV, et al. 2. Contact lens care and ocular surface homeostasis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S9–13. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(13)60004-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farris RL. Tear analysis in contact lens wearers. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1985;83:501–545.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Argüeso P, Georgiev G, et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366–403. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Dumbleton K, Theodoratos P, Patel K, Gupta R, Patel T. Pre-contact lens and pre-corneal tear film kinetics. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019;42(3):246–252. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2019.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntz A, Subbaraman LN, Sorbara L, Jones L. Tear exchange and contact lenses: a review. J Optom. 2015;8(1):2–11. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2014.12.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiffany JM. Tears in health and disease. Eye. 2003;17(8):923–926. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudgil P, Torres M, Millar TJ. Adsorption of lysozyme to phospholipid and meibomian lipid monolayer films. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2006;48(2):128–137. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wizert A, Iskander DR, Cwiklik L. Interaction of lysozyme with a tear film lipid layer model: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2017;1859(12):2289–2296. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenson JG. Anterior eye. In: Efron N, editor. Contact Lens Practice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2018:10–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, Stern ME. Biological functions of tear film. Exp Eye Res. 2020;197:108115. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2020.108115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jones LW, Forrest JA. Competitive effects from an artificial tear solution to protein adsorption. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(7):781–789. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour RA. Fundamental principles of the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein adsorption to material surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;191:110992. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luensmann D, Jones L. Protein deposition on contact lenses: the past, the present, and the future. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35(2):53–64. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2011.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L, Glasier MA, Dumbleton K, Jones L. Quantification of protein deposition on five commercially available silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:E–abstract070031.
   Google Scholar
• Omali NB, Subbaraman LN, Coles-Brennan C, Fadli Z, Jones LW. Biological and clinical implications of lysozyme deposition on soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(7):750–757. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM Jr, Valint PL Jr, Grobe GL 3rd. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials. 2001;22(24):3257–3260. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00163-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16(5):503–510. doi:10.1076/ceyr.16.5.503.7049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright EA, Payne KA, Jowitt TA, et al. Preservation of human tear protein structure and function by a novel contact lens multipurpose solution containing protein-stabilizing agents. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(1):36–42. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31823fdb2a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. An amplifying cascade of contact lens-related end-of-day hyperaemia and dryness symptoms. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(7):839–847. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1457163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliman NH, Morgan PB, MacDonald AS, Maldonado-Codina C. Subclinical inflammation of the ocular surface in soft contact lens wear. Cornea. 2020;39(2):146–154. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCanna DJ, Oh S, Seo J, et al. The effect of denatured lysozyme on human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(5):2006–2014. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Varikooty J, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Protein deposition and clinical symptoms in daily wear of etafilcon lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(10):1450–1459. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318269e583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jones L, Forrest JA. Measuring the kinetics and activity of adsorbed proteins: in vitro lysozyme deposited onto hydrogel contact lenses over short time periods. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101(3):755–764. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaei Omali N, Heynen M, Subbaraman LN, et al. Impact of lens care solutions on protein deposition on soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(8):963–972. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Brennan NA, Chalmers RL, et al. Thirty years of ‘quiet eye’ with etafilcon A contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(3):285–297. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barniak VL, Burke SE, Venkatesh S. Comparative evaluation of multi-purpose solutions in the stabilization of tear lysozyme. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S7–11. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.06.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Z, Carnt NA, Aliwarga Y, et al. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(3):251–259. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318196a74b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen M, Ng A, Martell E, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Activity of deposited lysozyme on contemporary soft contact lenses exposed to differing lens care systems. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1727–1733. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S296116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(3):143–151. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000204513.76568.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (Fort Worth, TX). FOCUS® DAILIES®, FOCUS® DAILIES® Toric, FOCUS® DAILIES® Progressives, DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus®, DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Toric and DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Multifocal (nelfilcon A) one-day contact lenses [package insert]; 2013. Available from: https://2.myalcon.com/sites/g/files/rbvwei471/files/2019-04/W92024162_I_NELFILCON_A.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (Fort Worth, TX). DAILIES TOTAL1® and DAILIES TOTAL1® Multifocal (delefilcon A) soft contact lenses for daily disposable wear [package insert]; 2019. Available from: http://embed.widencdn.net/pdf/plus/alcon/xe3t4jzpll/W900038292_I_DELFCN_US.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (Fort Worth, TX). Package insert for alcon precision1™ (verofilcon A) soft contact lenses [package insert]; 2019. Available from: http://embed.widencdn.net/pdf/plus/alcon/tmgdjw6wwf/W900177326-I-VEROFA-PREC1-US.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (Rochester, NY). BAUSCH + LOMB INFUSE™ (kalifilcon A) one-day soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses [package insert]; 2020. Available from: https://www.bausch.com/Portals/69/-/m/BL/United%20States/USFiles/Package%20Inserts/Vision%20Care/lenses/INFUSE-PIFG.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• CooperVision (Scottsville, NY). CLARITI 1 DAY CONTACT LENS [package insert]; 2019. Available from: https://coopervision.com/sites/coopervision.com/files/pi01092_rev_a_clariti_1_day_family_us_invigor_and_non-invigor.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• FDA 510(k) Summary K191763. MyDay (stenfilcon A) soft (hydrophilic) daily disposable contact lens; 2019. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf19/K190965.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (Jacksonville, FL). 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST brand contact lenses. 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST brand contact lenses for ASTIGMATISM. 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST Brand MULTIFOCAL contact lenses etafilcon A soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses visibility tinted with UV blocker for daily disposable wear [package insert]; 2021. Available from: https://www.acuvue.com/sites/acuvue_us/files/m-07-17-02_-_1_day_acuvue_moist_family_-_package_insert_and_fitting_guide.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (Jacksonville, FL). 1-DAY ACUVUE® TruEye® brand contact lenses with HYDRACLEAR® 1 technology (narafilcon A) visibility tinted with UV blocker for daily wear single use only lenses [package insert]; 2013. Available from: https://www.acuvue.com/sites/acuvue_us/files/as011303_fig_trueye.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (Jacksonville, FL). ACUVUE® oasys BRAND CONTACT LENS 1-day with hydraLuxe™ [package insert]; 2016. Available from: https://www.acuvue.com/sites/acuvue_us/files/ao-03-16-13_web_final_pi.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Salton MR. The lysis of micro-organisms by lysozyme and related enzymes. J Gen Microbiol. 1958;18(2):481–490. doi:10.1099/00221287-18-2-481
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masschalck B, Van Houdt R, Van Haver EG, Michiels CW. Inactivation of gram-negative bacteria by lysozyme, denatured lysozyme, and lysozyme-derived peptides under high hydrostatic pressure. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(1):339–344. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.1.339-344.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bmrb.io [homepage on the Internet]. BMRB Featured System: Lysozyme. Madison, WI: Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB). 2023 updated October 2023; cited April 4, 2023]. Available from: https://bmrb.io/featuredSys/Lysozyme/. Accessed May 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Berman ER. Tears. In: Blakemore C, editor. Biochemistry of the Eye. Perspectives in Vision Research. Boston: Springer; 1991:63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Huang TY, Chang CH, Baskaran N, Wei Y. Correlation between surface friction and the hydrophobicity of structure-related side-chain exposure of albumin on contact lens. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;209(Pt 1):112152. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su CY, Yeh LK, Lai CC, Li KY, Tseng CL, Fang HW. Effects of lysosomal deposition on the friction coefficient of hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(2):144–148. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2019.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlodarczyk SR, Custódio D, Pessoa A Jr, Monteiro G. Influence and effect of osmolytes in biopharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;131:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida M, Magalhães M, Veiga F, Figueiras A. Poloxamers, poloxamines and polymeric micelles: definition, structure and therapeutic applications in cancer. J Polym Res. 2018;25:31. doi:10.1007/s10965-017-1426-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafi D, Smith CM, Makinen MW, Lee RC. Multi-block poloxamer surfactants suppress aggregation of denatured proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1780(1):7–15. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin J, Mustafi D, Poellmann MJ, Lee RC. Amphiphilic copolymers reduce aggregation of unfolded lysozyme more effectively than polyethylene glycol. Phys Biol. 2017;14(1):16003. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/aa5788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poellmann MJ, Sosnick TR, Meredith SC, Lee RC. The pentablock amphiphilic copolymer T1107 prevents aggregation of denatured and reduced lysozyme. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17(2):1600217. doi:10.1002/mabi.201600217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling MX, Nguyen M, McFaul CA, Lee RC. Peroxidation of tetronic 1107 reduces protein chaperone effect. Phys Biol. 2022;19(4):046008. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/ac6eaf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2001;23(1):51–59. doi:10.1076/ceyr.23.1.51.5418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar