Evaluating Surgical Risk Using FMEA and MULTIMOORA Methods under a Single-Valued Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Environment

References

• Li DP, He JQ, Cheng PF, Wang JQ, Zhang HY. A novel selection model of surgical treatments for early gastric cancer patients based on heterogeneous multicriteria group decision-making. Symmetry. 2018;10(6):223. doi:10.3390/sym10060223
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz RG, Lee DA, Siegel DM. Risk assessment in surgical patients: balancing iatrogenic risks and benefits. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29(6):669–677. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.08.01222014989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38(3):261–271. doi:10.1097/00005650-200003000-0000310718351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria Laura C, Clemente P. FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2009;404(1):75–78. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, He JQ, Cheng PF, Xiao RS, Zhou XH. A multi-criteria 2-tuple linguistic group decision-making method based on TODIM for cholecystitis treatments selection. IEEE Access. 2019;7:127967–127986. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–842.e833. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.38524055383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles JB, Peláez CE. Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1995;50(2):203–213. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P. Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. Int J Qual Reliab Manage. 2005;22(9):986–1004. doi:10.1108/02656710510625248
   Google Scholar
• Shan -M-M, Li P, Liu H-C. Interval 2-tuple linguistic distance operators and their applications to supplier evaluation and selection. Mathematical Probl Eng. 2016;2016:1–12. doi:10.1155/2016/9893214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helvacioglu S. Ozen fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design. Ocean Eng. 2014;79(2):131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasha R, Sepehri MM, Khatibi T. A fuzzy FMEA approach to prioritizing surgical cancellation factors. Int J Hosp Res. 2013;2(1):17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson O, Brodie A, Vincent CA, Hanna GB. A systematic proactive risk assessment of hazards in surgical wards: a quantitative study. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6):1086–1092. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f5f3622504280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HC, Li P, You JX, Chen YZ. A novel approach for FMEA: combination of interval 2-Tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2015;31(5):761–772. doi:10.1002/qre.1633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong SC, Chung JH, Fu CY. A novel approach for evaluating the risk of health care failure modes. J Med Syst. 2012;36(6):3967–3974. doi:10.1007/s10916-012-9868-522773135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnezi R, Hemi A, Hemi R. Using the failure mode and effects analysis model to improve parathyroid hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone testing. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2016;9:271–274. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S11747227980440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, You J-X, Duan C-Y. An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Prod Econ. 2019;207:163–172. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, Wang L-E, You X-Y, Wu S-M. Failure mode and effect analysis with extended grey relational analysis method in cloud setting. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence. 2019;30(7–8):745–767. doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1337506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40(2):828–838. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HC, You JX, Shan MM, Su Q. Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence. 2019;30(5–6):537–564. doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1317585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman C, Kaya İ, Şenvar Ö. Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis under fuzziness. Human Ecol Risk Assess. 2013;19(2):538–552. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.737753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari H, Faraji Z, Majidian S. Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. J Intell Manuf. 2016;27(2):475–486. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0880-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dağsuyu C, Göçmen E, Narlı M, Kokangül A. Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Comp Ind Eng. 2016;101:286–294. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng XY, Jiang W. Fuzzy risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using a D numbers based multi-sensor information fusion method. Sensors. 2017;17(9):2086. doi:10.3390/s17092086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WZ, Liu XW, Chen XQ, Qin Y. Risk assessment based on hybrid FMEA framework by considering decision maker’s psychological behavior character. Comp Ind Eng. 2019;136:516–527. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar AM, Rajakarunakaran S, Pitchipoo P, Vimalesan R. Fuzzy based risk prioritisation in an auto LPG dispensing station. Saf Sci. 2018;101:231–247. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M, Daneshvar S, Setareh H. An extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf Sci. 2017;98:113–123. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavasani SM, Ramzali N, Sabzalipour F, Akyuz E. Utilisation of fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells. Ocean Eng. 2015;108:729–737. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooranloo HS, Ayatollah AS. Pathology the internet banking service quality using failure mode and effect analysis in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2017;19(1):109–123. doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0265-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian W, Wang Z-J, Li K. Medical waste disposal method selection based on a hierarchical decision model with intuitionistic fuzzy relations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(9):896. doi:10.3390/ijerph13090896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, You JX, Liu HC. Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Comp. 2017;21(18):5355–5367. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2118-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8(3):338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Atanassov KT, Rangasamy P. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986;20(1):87–96. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji P, Zhang HY, Wang JQ. A fuzzy decision support model with sentiment analysis for items comparison in e-commerce: the case study of PConline.com. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics. 2018;49(10):1993–2004. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2018.2875163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang RX, Wang JQ, Lin L. Multi-criteria group decision-making method based on interdependent inputs of single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic information. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;30(1):241–260. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2672-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang RX, Wang JQ, Zhang HY. A multi-criteria decision-making method based on single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic preference relations with complete weight information. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;30(11):3383–3398. doi:10.1007/s00521-017-2925-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang RX, Wang JQ, Zhang HY. Evaluation of e-commerce websites: an integrated approach under a single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic environment. Knowledge Based Syst. 2017;135:44–59. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2017.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LE, Liu HC, Quan MY. Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Comp Ind Eng. 2016;102:175–185. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N, Mao LX. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(17):12926–12934. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK. Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study. Resour Conservation Recycl. 2015;104:375–390. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, You J-X, You X-Y, Shan -M-M. A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method. Appl Soft Comput. 2015;28(C):579–588. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega. 2015;53:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian ZP, Wang JQ, Zhang HY. An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy and VIKOR methods. Appl Soft Comput. 2018;72:636–646. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie RX, Tian ZP, Wang JQ, Zhang HY, Wang TL. Water security sustainability evaluation: applying a multistage decision support framework in industrial region. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:1681–1704. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang JQ, Hu JH. Multi-criteria decision-making method based on dominance degree and BWM with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. Int J Mach Learn Cybernetics. 2019;10(7):1671–1685. doi:10.1007/s13042-018-0845-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HC, You JX, Chen SM, Chen YZ. An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty. IIE Trans. 2016;48(11):1027–1042. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2016.1172742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabzad SM, Razmi J, Ghorbani M. Classify purchasing items based on risk and profitability attributes; using MCDM and FMEA techniques. Res J Int Stud. 2011;1(21):80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lolli F, Ishizaka A, Gamberini R, Rimini B, Messori M. FlowSort-GDSS– a novel group multi-criteria decision support system for sorting problems with application to FMEA. Expert Syst Appl Int J. 2015;42(17–18):6342–6349. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin A, Khodadady Z, Shirouyehzad H. Ranking electronic customer complaints by FMEA and TOPSIS with a case study in Isfahan Province Gas Company. Int J Proc Manage Benchmarking. 2014;5(1):19–36. doi:10.1504/IJPMB.2015.066027
   Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK. Multimoora optimization used to decide on a bank loan to buy property. Technol Econ Devel Econ. 2011;17(1):174–188. doi:10.3846/13928619.2011.560632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK. Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies. Technol Econ Devel Econ. 2010;16(1):5–24. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybernetics. 2006;35(35):445–469.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhao L, Liang H. A novel multi-attribute group decision-making method based on the MULTIMOORA with linguistic evaluations. Soft Comp. 2018;22(16):5347–5361. doi:10.1007/s00500-018-3030-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Baležentis A, Baležentis T. Multimoora for the EU member states updated with fuzzy number theory. Technol Econ Devel Econ. 2011;17(2):259–290. doi:10.3846/20294913.2011.580566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, Fan X-J, Li P, Chen Y-Z. Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2014;34:168–177. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streimikiene D, Balezentis T. Multi-objective ranking of climate change mitigation policies and measures in Lithuania. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;18:144–153. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracka M, Zavadskas EK. Panel building refurbishment elements effective selection by applying multiple-criteria methods. Int J Strategic Prop Manage. 2013;17(2):210–219. doi:10.3846/1648715X.2013.808283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baležentis T, Baležentis A. A survey on development and applications of the multi-criteria decision making method MULTIMOORA. J Multi Crit Dec Anal. 2014;21(3–4):209–222. doi:10.1002/mcda.1501
   Google Scholar
• Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK. Robustness of MULTIMOORA: a method for multi-objective optimization. Informatica. 2012;23(1):1–25. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2012.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian ZP, Wang J, Wang JQ, Zhang HY. An improved MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria decision-making based on interdependent inputs of simplified neutrosophic linguistic information. Neural Comput Appl. 2017;28(1):585–597. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2378-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julia N, Mills PD, Noel E, et al. Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow-up report. Arch Surg. 2011;146(11):1235–1239. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.17121768408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfant G, Belfanti PG, Gabrielli D, et al. Clinical risk analysis with failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) model in a dialysis unit. J Nephrol. 2010;23(1):111–118.20091494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siriphuwanun V, Punjasawadwong Y, Lapisatepun W, Charuluxananan S, Uerpairojkit K. Prognostic factors for death and survival with or without complications in cardiac arrest patients receiving CPR within 24 hours of anesthesia for emergency surgery. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:199–210. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S6879725378961
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pikkel D, Sharabi-Nov A, Pikkel J. It is the left eye, right? Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:77–80. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S6072824748828
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chanamool N, Naenna T. Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Appl Soft Comput. 2016;43:441–453. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G. Implementation of a risk management plan in a hospital operating room. Int J Nurs Sci. 2015;2(4):348–354. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Wang HB, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R. Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: theory and applications in computing. Comp Sci. 2005;65(vi):87.
   Google Scholar
• Wu XH, Wang JQ, Peng JJ, Qian J. A novel group decision-making method with probability hesitant interval neutrosphic set and its application in middle level manager’s selection. Int J Uncertain Quantif. 2018;8(4):291–319. doi:10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deli I, Subas Y Single Valued Neutrosophic Numbers and Their Applications to Multicriteria Decision Making Problem. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ye J. Some weighted aggregation operators of trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and their multiple attribute decision making method. Informatica. 2017;28(2):387–402. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2017.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega. 2016;64:126–130. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji P, Zhang HY, Wang JQ. Fuzzy decision-making framework for treatment selection based on the combined QUALIFLEX–TODIM method. Int J Syst Sci. 2017;48(14):3072–3086. doi:10.1080/00207721.2017.1365968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie RX, Tian ZP, Wang XK, Wang JQ, Wang TL. Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment. Knowledge Based Syst. 2018;162:185–201. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucco P, Cavallin M. A quantitative approach to clinical risk assessment: the CREA method. Saf Sci. 2006;44(6):491–513. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asefzadeh S, Yarmohammadian MH, Nikpey A, Atighechian G. Clinical risk assessment in intensive care unit. 2013;4(5):592–598.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC. TOPSIS strategy for multi-attribute decision making with trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. Neutro Sets Syst. 2018;19:29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar