Effectiveness of Breast and Eye Shielding During Cervical Spine Radiography: An Experimental Study

References

• McKee M, Healy J. The role of the hospital in a changing environment. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):803–810.10916917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim B. Radiation exposure dose on persons engaged in radiation-related industries in Korea. J Radiol Sci Technol. 2006;29(3):185–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mugi K, C PK, Pintelon L. Application of HFMEA on risk assessment of radiology processes in public hospitals: a case study of Nyeri County Referral Hospital. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kutanzi KR, Lumen A, Koturbash I, Miousse IR. Pediatric exposures to ionizing radiation: carcinogenic considerations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(11):1057. doi:10.3390/ijerph13111057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9):849–857. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa090124919710483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghrabi HA, Deb P, Vijayan A, Wang L. An overview of lead aprons for radiation protection: are they doing their best. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Rosenkrantz AB. Providing compassionate care for the elderly patient in radiology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020;49(2):67–69. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.02.00130797622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vano E. ICRP recommendations on managing patient dose in digital radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimet. 2005;114(1–3):126–130. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uosif M, Mostafa A, Issa SA, Tekin HO, Alrowaili ZA, Kilicoglu O. Structural, mechanical and radiation shielding properties of newly developed tungsten lithium borate glasses: an experimental study. J Non Cryst Solids. 2020;532:119882. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuzaid MM, Susoy G, Issa SA, Elshami W, Kilicoglu O, Tekin HO. Relationship between melting-conditions and gamma shielding performance of fluoro-sulfo-phosphate (FPS) glass systems: a comparative investigation. Ceram Int. 2020;46(10):15255–15269. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susoy G, Guclu EA, Kilicoglu O, et al. The impact of Cr2O3 additive on nuclear radiation shielding properties of LiF–SrO–B2O3 glass system. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;242:122481. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh RM, Silosky M. Patient shielding in diagnostic imaging: discontinuing a legacy practice. Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):755–757. doi:10.2214/AJR.18.2050830673332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan SL, Magill D, Felice MA, Xiao R, Ali S, Zhu X. Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(2):227–234. doi:10.1007/s00247-017-3996-529046919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Merwe B. Shielding of patients, foolish or reasonable? S Afr Radiographer. 2019;57(1):5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, et al. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP. 2013;42(2):1–63. doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MÁC C, Cadena JLR, Romero R, et al. Frequency of vertebral fractures in high-energy trauma. Coluna/Columna. 2018;17(2):147–150. doi:10.1590/s1808-185120181702189443
   Google Scholar
• Tahvonen P, Oikarinen H, Niinimäki J, Liukkonen E, Mattila S, Tervonen O. Justification and active guideline implementation for spine radiography referrals in primary care. Acta Radiol. 2017;58(5):586–592. doi:10.1177/028418511666187927609905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp J. Quality Management in the Imaging Sciences E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• MekiÅ¡ N, Zontar D, Skrk D. The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography. Radiol Oncol. 2013;47(1):26–31. doi:10.2478/raon-2013-000423450158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank ED, Long BW, Smith BJ. Merrill’s Atlas of Radiographic Positioning and Procedures. Vol. 3 Elsevier; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bushong SC. Radiologic Science for Technologists-E-Book: Physics, Biology, and Protection. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hayre C, Bungay H, Jeffery C, Cobb C, Atutornu J. Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs? Radiography. 2018;24(1):15–21. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2017.09.00229306369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor M, Arrigo A, Kierans Z, et al. An analysis of breast and gonad lead shielding effectiveness in abdominal AP radiography: a phantom study. OPTIMAX Ebook. 2018;128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarmatori A, Nocetti L, Mistretta G, Zambelli G, Costi T. Reducing absorbed dose to eye lenses in head CT examinations: the effect of bismuth shielding. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016;39(2):583–589. doi:10.1007/s13246-016-0445-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper KD, Neuman JD, King SH, Kunselman AR. Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(6):1194–1198.11415918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavideh M, Khorshidi SR, Baghmalek AB, et al. Prevalence of shielding in diagnostic X-ray centers in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a systematic review. Mod Health Sci. 2019;2(2):p38. doi:10.30560/mhs.v2n2p38
   Google Scholar
• Fordham LA, Brown ED, Washburn D, Clark RL. Efficacy and feasibility of breast shielding during abdominal fluoroscopic examinations. Acad Radiol. 1997;4(9):639–643. doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80269-79288192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brnić Z, Vekić B, Hebrang A, Anić P. Efficacy of breast shielding during CT of the head. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(11):2436–2440. doi:10.1007/s00330-003-1945-112827426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaconsfield T, Nicholson R, Thornton A, Al-Kutoubi A. Would thyroid and breast shielding be beneficial in CT of the head? Eur Radiol. 1998;8(4):664–667. doi:10.1007/s0033000504569569344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karami V, Zabihzadeh M, Shams N, Malehi AS. Gonad shielding during pelvic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Iran Med. 2017;20:2.28112524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies BH, Manningâ E, Stanley AS, Hughes VJ, Ward AJ. The impact of gonad shielding in anteroposterior (AP) pelvis projections in an adult: a phantom study utilising digital radiography (DR). Radiography. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney S, Gingold E, Zaidi H. Gonadal shielding should be discontinued for most diagnostic imaging exams. Med Phys. 2019;46(3):1111–1114. doi:10.1002/mp.1340930697762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar