Evaluation of Routine Health Examination for Screening Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in Eastern China: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

References

• European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. 4th ed. Savona, Italy: PubliComm; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Song P, Wang J, Bucan K, Theodoratou E, Rudan I, Chan KY. GHERG (2017) national and subnational prevalence and burden of glaucoma in China: a systemic analysis. J Glob Health. 2017;7(2):020705. doi:10.7189/jogh.07.02070529302324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(5):389–393. doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.3898695555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, Munoz B, Klein R, Snyder R. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of hispanic subjects: proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1819–1826. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.12.181911735794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernández R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(41):iii–iv, ix–x, 1–190. doi:10.3310/hta11410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuderi GL, Cedrone C, Nucci C, Macri G, Moretto C, Cerulli L. The prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in Italy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2003;3(1):99.
   Google Scholar
• Song YJ, Kim YW, Park KH, Kim YK, Choi HJ, Jeoung JW. Comparison of glaucoma patients referred by glaucoma screening versus referral from primary eye clinic. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210582. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.021058230629694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhou X, Kang Y, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma in a rural northeast China population: a population-based survey in Bin County, Harbin. Eye. 2012;26(2):283–291. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.24322157917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Zou H, Lee RY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma in a city of Eastern China: a population-based study in Pudong New District, Shanghai. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:134. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0124-x26462564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(7):2782–2788. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-005116799014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Chen JH, Li JJ, et al. The prevalence and its screening methods of primary open angle glaucoma in defined population based study of rural and urban in Beijing. Chin J Ophthalmol. 2004;40:726–732.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Kong X, Xiao M, Sun X. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intra-ocular pressure in untreated patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(6):e460–e467. doi:10.1111/aos26843038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaranta L, Katsanos A, Riva I, et al. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure characteristics in newly diagnosed patients with normal tension glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2016;30(11):1481–1489. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.16827472211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;53(1):34–43. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x
   Google Scholar
• Brusini P, Filacorda S. Enhanced glaucoma staging system(GSS2) for classifying functional damage in glaucom. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(1):40–46. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.9716378017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasker MT, van den Enden A, Bakker D, Hoyng PF. Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(4):481–488. doi:10.1001/archopht.118.4.48110766133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira ML, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, Alward WL, Hayreh SS, Kwon YH. Rate and pattern of visual field decline in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(12):2232–2240. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01248-412466164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1610–1615. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.29720008716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(7):1419–1428. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)72089-68641844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group CN-TGS. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):487–497. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00223-29780093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group CN-TGS. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):498–505. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00272-49780094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1268–1279. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.126812365904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(1):48–56. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.1.4812523884
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyman LG, Komaroff E, Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Leske MC; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Treatment and vision-related quality of life in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(9):1505–1513. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.02816019074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Huang S, Huang P, Li C, Chen Z, Zhong Y. Concordance of 24-h intraocular pressure curve in patients with untreated unilateral primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(2):1461–1469. doi:10.3892/etm.2018.631530116395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang NL, Friedman DS, Zhou Q, et al. A population-based assessment of 24-hour intraocular pressure among subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma: the Handan Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(11):7817–7821. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-752821873661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deokule SP, Doshi A, Vizzeri G, et al. Relationship of the 24-hour pattern of intraocular pressure with optic disc appearance in primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(5):833–839. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.03419195707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):1017–1025. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30192-49186444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer M; Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(2):247–253. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00518-211158794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Leske MC; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Natural history of open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2271–2276. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.04219854514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar