126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Quadrant of Difficulty-Usefulness (QoDU) as New Method in Preparing for Improvement of E-learning in Health College

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1625-1632 | Published online: 18 Sep 2020

References

  • Nugroho HSW, Prayitno H, Budiono A. Sort elements based on priority, in order to improve the quality of E-learning in health using difficulty-usefulness pyramid with weighting (DUP-We). Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(19):186–193. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i18.10809
  • Quadri NN, Muhammed A, Sanober S, Qureshi MRN, Shah A. Barriers effecting successful implementation of E-learning in Saudi Arabian Universities. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2017;12(6):94–107. doi:10.3991/ijet.v12i06.7003
  • Daramola O, Oladipupo O, Afolabi I, Olopade A. Heuristic evaluation of an institutional E-learning system: a Nigerian case. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2017;12(3):26–42. doi:10.3991/ijet.v12i03.6083
  • El-seoud MSA, Seddiek N, El-khouly MM, Nosseir A. E-learning and students’ motivation: a research study on the effect of E-learning on higher education. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2014;9(4):20–26.
  • Tutorials Point. cPanel Tutorial [homepage on the internet]. Tutorials point, simply easy learning; 2107 Available from: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/cpanel. Accessed 13, 2018.
  • Bakri H. The planning of community health center in Indonesia. Eur J Res Reflect Manag Sci. 2018;6(3):12–18.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci. 2008;39(2):273–315.
  • Nugroho HSW, Sillehu S, Sunarko B. Difficultness-usefulness pyramid (DUP) as new method to select elements prioritized in management of e-Learning in health. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2018;9(2):206–211. doi:10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00120.1
  • Surendran P. Technology acceptance model: a survey of literature. Int J Bus Soc Res. 2012;2(4):175–178.
  • Lai PC. The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. J Inf Syst Technol Manag. 2017;14(1):21–38.
  • Rahimi B, Nadri H, Afshar HL, Timpka T. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inform. 2018;9(3):604–634. doi:10.1055/s-0038-166809130112741
  • Liao S, Hong J, Wen M, Pan Y, Wu Y. Applying technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore users’ behavioral intention to adopt a performance assessment system for E-book production. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Educ. 2018;14(10):1–12.
  • Deslonde V, Becerra M. The technology acceptance model (TAM): exploring school counselors’ acceptance and use of naviance. Prof Counselor. 2018;8(4):369–382. doi:10.15241/vd.8.4.369