When Politics Meets Pandemic: How Prime Minister Netanyahu and a Small Team Communicated Health and Risk Information to the Israeli Public During the Early Stages of COVID-19

References

• WHO Director-General. Statement on the Second Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee Regarding the Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (2019-Ncov). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Betsch C, Wieler LH, Habersaat K; group C. Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1255–1256. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30729-732247323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett P, Calman K, Curtis S, Fischbacher-Smith D. Risk Communication and Public Health. Second ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg A, Shir-Raz Y. Risk Communication and Infectious Diseases in an Age of Digital Media. London and New York: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sellnow DD, Sellnow TL. The IDEA model for effective instructional risk and crisis communication by emergency managers and other key spokespersons. J Emerg Manag. 2019;17(1):67–78. doi:10.5055/jem.2019.039930933307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Anal. 1999;19(4):689–701. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x10765431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CW. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Adm Soc. 1998;30(2):166–193. doi:10.1177/0095399798302003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chess C, Salomone KL, Hance BJ, Saville A. Results of a national symposium on risk communication: next steps for government agencies. Risk Anal. 1995;15(2):115–125. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covello VT, McCallum DB, Pavlova M. Principles and guidelines for improving risk communication In: Covello VT, McCallum DB, Pavlova MT, editors. Effective Risk Communication. Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis. Vol. 4 Boston, MA: Springer; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Deitchman S. Enhancing crisis leadership in public health emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;7(5):534–540. doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.8124274133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binagwaho A. We need compassionate leadership management based on evidence to defeat COVID-19. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(10):413–414. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg A, Mordini E, James JJ, Greco D, Green MS. Risk communication recommendations and implementation during emerging infectious diseases: a case study of the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(2):158–169. doi:10.1017/dmp.2014.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg A, Stolero N, Mordini E, Billingsley M, James JJ, Green MS. Emerging infectious disease (EID) communication during the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak: literature review (2009–2013) of the methodology used for EID communication analysis. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(2):199–206. doi:10.1017/dmp.2014.12625882126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett L. COVID-19: the medium is the message. Lancet. 2020;395(10228):942–943. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30600-032171075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker K, Menasce Horowitz J, Browm A About half of lower-income Americans report household job or wage loss due to COVID-19. Pew Research Center; 2020 Available from: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/04/21/about-half-of-lower-income-americans-report-household-job-or-wage-loss-due-to-covid-19/. Accessed 1120, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso V. Covid: not a great equaliser. Covid Econ. 2020;(19):241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Greer SL, King EJ, da Fonseca EM, Peralta-Santos A. The comparative politics of COVID-19: the need to understand government responses. Glob Public Health. 2020;15(9):1413–1416. doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.178334032564670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulejo M, Querubín P Electoral concerns reduce restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series; 2020 Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w27498. Accessed 125, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong Q-H, Ho T-M, Nguyen H-K, Vuong -T-T. Healthcare consumers’ sensitivity to costs: a reflection on behavioural economics from an emerging market. Palgrave Commun. 2018;4(1):70. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0127-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufai SR, Bunce C. World leaders’ usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2020;42(3):510–516. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaa04932309854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley P. Some European Nations Ease Pandemic Rules, but Move Warily. The New York Times; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Specia M. Sugarcoating and Brutal Honesty: How Leaders are Handling Coronavirus Crisis. The New York Times; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ladkin D. What Donald Trump’s response to COVID-19 teaches us: it’s time for our romance with leaders to end. Leadership. 2020;16(3):273–278. doi:10.1177/1742715020929134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson VB Five coronavirus success stories: different, but the same. Security Nexus: Daniel K Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies; 2020 Available from: https://apcss.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/SecurityNexus_Watson_FIVE_CORONAVIRUS_SUCCESS_STORIES-C.pdf. Accessed 92, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson S. Pandemic leadership: lessons from New Zealand’s approach to COVID-19. Leadership. 2020;16(3):279–293. doi:10.1177/1742715020929151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambell A. Jacinda Ardern’s coronavirus plan is working because, unlike others, she’s behaving like a true leader. Independent. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich AS, Lotito NJ. Pandemic performance: women leaders in the Covid-19 crisis. Politics Gend. 2020;1–9. doi:10.1017/S1743923X20000549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriola TB, Knight WA. COVID-19, George Floyd and human security. Afri Security. 2020;13(2):111–115. doi:10.1080/19392206.2020.1783760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlanger S. Poland and Hungary Use Coronavirus to Punish Opposition. The New York Times; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kolhatkar S. Can Democracy Survive the Coronavirus? NewsClick; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg A, Cohen R, Hijazi R, Abed Elhadi SN. Analysis of public perception of the Israeli government’s early emergency instructions regarding COVID-19: online survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e19370. doi:10.2196/1937032392172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekel U. The System-Wide Campaign to Battle the Corona Crisis in Israel. The Institute for National Security Studies; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. Triangulation 2.0. J Mix Methods Res. 2012;6(2):80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner KD, Davidson PJ, Pollini RA, Strathdee SA, Washburn R, Palinkas LA. Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: exemplars from research with drug using populations. Int J Drug Policy. 2012;23(1):54–61. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.00921680168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545–547. doi:10.1188/14.Onf.545-54725158659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh CJ, Inman AG. Qualitative data analysis and interpretation in counseling psychology: strategies for best practices. Couns Psychol. 2007;35(3):369–403. doi:10.1177/0011000006292596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin M, Fossey E. Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: guidelines for occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54(2):88–94. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutain DM. Critical language and discourse study: their transformative relevance for critical nursing inquiry. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1999;21(3):1–8. doi:10.1097/00012272-199903000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker I. Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. Florence, KY, US: Taylor & Frances/Routledge; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Data analysis in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2000;3(3):68–70. doi:10.1136/ebn.3.3.68
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/104973230527668716204405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Jones J, Turunen H, Snelgrove S. Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;6(5):100–110. doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Sampling in grounded theory In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007:229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo. Corona regulations; 2020 Available from: https://www.nevo.co.il/general/CoronaUpdates.aspx. Accessed 97, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman AM, Miles MB. Data management and analysis methods In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1994:428–444.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC. Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28(4):587–604. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel Ministry of Justice. Memorandum of the General Security Service Accreditation Law to Assist in the National Effort to Reduce the Spread of the New Corona Virus (Temporary Order). 2020 519, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kaliner E, Moran-Gilad J, Grotto I, et al. Silent reintroduction of wild-type poliovirus to Israel, 2013 – risk communication challenges in an argumentative atmosphere. Eurosurveillance. 2014;19(7):20703.24576475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DE, Olaniran BA. Expanding the crisis planning function: introducing elements of risk communication to crisis communication practice. Public Relat Rev. 1998;24(3):387–400. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80147-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers VHM, Wiedemann PM, Gutscher H, et al. Affect-inducing risk communication: current knowledge and future directions. J Risk Res. 2012;15(3):257–271. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.634521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochinoiu E. Stylistic aspects in the English military language. Revista Academiei Fortelor Terestre. 2009;14(2):71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Israel I, Lancet D. Corona data analysis: “Leap? The ‘new’ patients are not contagious”. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann D. There is no one to fight in the atmosphere of hysteria. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lancet D. A second outbreak? 8 important questions for the Ministry of Health. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenwald MS History’s deadliest pandemics, from ancient Rome to modern America. The Washington Post; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard; 2020 Available from: https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=Cj0KCQiAkuP9BRCkARIsAKGLE8USyaKh-Mnusm3_p83n_I-_ixF5DqGD-qKOSIroA4vFjerudhOHChIaAilDEALw_wcB. Accessed 1121, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Arlosoroff M. This is not how we fight the pandemic: the failure of corona tests will cost us NIS 90 billion. TheMarker. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Efrati I. Factors involved in managing the corona crisis: sadetsky torpedoed critical initiatives and hid information. Haaretz. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Israel Ministry of Health. Emergency regulations restricting activity have been approved in order to reduce the spread of the coronavirus in Israel [press release]. 325, 2020 Available from: https://www.gov.il/he/departments/news/25032020_01. Accessed September 3, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Joint Prime Minister’s Office, Health Ministry and Finance Ministry Press Release [press release]. 2020 Available from: https://mfa.gov.il/MFA/InnovativeIsrael/Economy/Pages/Joint-Prime-Minister-s-Office-Health-Ministry-and-Finance-Ministry-Press-Release-19-April-2020.aspx. Accessed November 21, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Peleg B. Business owners in Tel Aviv claim that the purple label regulations are not understood. This week they received 646 reports. Haaretz. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dovrat-Meseritz A. Every store owner should hire a legal advisor today who will tell him what is allowed and what is not. TheMarker. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner I, Freidson Y. The opening of IKEA has caused a stir in the government and the market: “Disgrace and discrimination”. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kadosh‎ N. What is behind the decision that allowed the opening of the IKEA chain? Calcalist. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Levi L, Dovrat-Meseritz A. The extent of IKEA owners’ contributions to Gur hasidic storks has been revealed; and what does that have to do with Ayelet Shaked? TheMarker. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Somfalvi A. “It does not make sense to open IKEA and leave the malls behind”. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Efrati I. Essential information about the corona is not available to the public, ministers and even Ministry of Health officials. Haaertz. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dvash R, Zomer G. Survey: Transparency in the Corona Crisis - Summary of Public Attitudes. The Movment for Freedom of Information; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider T. Request from the Corona Committee: hold a discussion on information transparency. Globes. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz A. Health Minister Litzman was diagnosed with corona. Haaretz. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Haeertz Health. Worshipers in Jerusalem: Litzman prayed indoors in violation of emergency regulations. Haaretz. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nachshoni K, Mandelbaum E. On Litzman Street, contrary to instructions: praying in a synagogue. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Linder R. “Do not bring the son home”: Netanyahu, Rivlin and Litzman present - this is not how the Corona is defeated. TheMarker. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rabad A. Research: the public majority trust Bar Siman Tov, less on Litzman. YNET. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham A. Epidemics, pandemics, and the doomsday scenario. Hist Speaking. 2008;9(7):29–31. doi:10.1353/hsp.2008.0035
   Google Scholar
• Wald P. Contagious: Cultures, Carriers, and the Outbreak Narrative. Durham: Duke University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen A, Lupton D. The New Public Health: Health and Self in the Age of Risk. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Karanikolos M, McKee M How comparable is Covid-19 mortality across countries? COVID-19 cross-country analysis; 2020 Available from: https://analysis.covid19healthsystem.org/index.php/2020/06/04/how-comparable-is-covid-19-mortality-across-countries/. Accessed 1120, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman P Ebola in the U.S. (so far): the public health establishment and the quarantine debate. The Peter M. Sandman Risk Communication Website; 2014 Available from: http://www.psandman.com/col/Ebola-4.htm. Accessed 514, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gonsalves G, Staley P. Panic, paranoia, and public health - The AIDS epidemic’s lessons for ebola. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(25):2348–2349.25372947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viebeck E Health officials struggle to control the media narrative about Ebola. The Hill; 2014 Available from: http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/220458-feds-struggle-to-control-the-media-narrative-about-ebola. Accessed 94, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenna M. Ebolanoia: the only thing we have to fear is Ebola fear itself. Wired; 2014 Available from: http://www.wired.com/2014/10/ebolanoia/. Accessed 94, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Witte K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monogr. 1994;61(2):113–134. doi:10.1080/03637759409376328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee M, Gugushvili A, Koltai J, Stuckler D. Are populist leaders creating the conditions for the spread of COVID-19?; Comment on “A scoping review of populist radical right parties’ influence on welfare policy and its implications for population health in Europe. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg A, Zemach M. From a fiasco to the Supertanker grand finale: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s crisis communication during the Carmel disaster. J Risk Res. 2012;15(8):967–989. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.686052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlosoroff M. Netanyahu’s megalomania will kill us all. TheMarker. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Janis IL. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP, Barkema HG. Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(5):982–996. doi:10.1037/a002915922774764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(6):1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.100815584838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strat Manag J. 1989;10(S1):107–124. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick WH, Miller CC, Huber GP. The impact of diversity on organizational performance In: Glick WH, editor. Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993:176–214.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, West MA. Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(6):1191–1201. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.119111768061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner JT, Ragland JP. Tabling, discussing, and giving in: dissent in workgroups. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract. 2019;23(1):57–74. doi:10.1037/gdn0000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin A, Lagadec P. Preparing for the future: critical challenges in crisis management. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2000;8(4):185–191. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.00138
   Google Scholar
• Lawton L. Public health and crisis leadership in the 21st century. Perspect Public Health. 2013;133(3):144–145. doi:10.1177/175791391348846923657232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkayastha S, Salvatore M, Mukherjee B. Are women leaders significantly better at controlling the contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic? J Health Soc Sci. 2020;5(2):231–240.32875269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson S Three reasons why Jacinda Ardern’s coronavirus response has been a masterclass in crisis leadership. The Conversation; 2020 Available from: https://theconversation.com/three-reasons-why-jacinda-arderns-coronavirus-response-has-been-a-masterclass-in-crisis-leadership-135541. Accessed 1120, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• You J. Lessons from South Korea’s Covid-19 policy response. Am Rev Public Admin. 2020;50(6–7):801–808. doi:10.1177/0275074020943708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensman J. The aesthetics and politics of footnoting. Int J Polit Cult Soc. 1988;1(3):443–470. doi:10.1007/BF01385430
   Google Scholar
• Meyer S, Ward P, Coveney J, Rogers W. Trust in the health system: an analysis and extension of the social theories of Giddens and Luhmann. Health Sociol Rev. 2008;17(2):177–186. doi:10.5172/hesr.451.17.2.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt RE. How can we make food risk communication better: where are we and where are we going? J Risk Res. 2006;9(8):869–890. doi:10.1080/13669870601065585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcknasy B. Petition against the Ministry of Health: the management of information regarding the Corona virus is “amateur”. TheMarker. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fillion S. The Science Behind Women Leaders’ Success in Fighting Covid-19. Forbes; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ashkenazi S. Scientists Against Government Guidelines: There is No Medical Reason for the Aggravation of the Subject of Masks. Globes; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Filut A. Board of the Association of Public Health Physicians: the charge to wear a mask may harm the eradication of the corona. Calcalist. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. Facemasks for the prevention of infection in healthcare and community settings. BMJ. 2015;350:h694. doi:10.1136/bmj.h69425858901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Modes of Transmission of Virus Causing COVID-19: Implications for IPC Precaution Recommendations. Scientific Brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• van Asselt MBA, Vos E. Wrestling with uncertain risks: EU regulation of GMOs and the uncertainty paradox. J Risk Res. 2008;11(1):281–300. doi:10.1080/13669870801990806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Asselt MBA, Vos E, Rooijackers B. Science, knowledge and uncertainty in EU risk regulation In: Everson M, Vos E, editors. Uncertain Risks Regulated. Oxon, OX: Routledge-Cavendish; 2009:359–388.
   Google Scholar
• Fox T The role of uncertainty intolerance in european risk governance. Paper presented at: Risk Research Symposium; King’s College London; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Singapore. COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019). gov.sg; 2020 Available from: https://www.gov.sg/features/covid-19. Accessed 94, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Singapore. The science behind why masks help prevent COVID-19 spread. gov.sg; 2020 Available from: https://www.gov.sg/article/the-science-behind-why-masks-help-prevent-covid-19-spread. Accessed 94, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston GD, Chi Chen L. Risk communication in the aftermath of the World Trade Center disaster. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42(6):543–544. doi:10.1002/ajim.1016312439880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman N, Salmon CT. Guilt, fear, stigma and knowledge gaps: ethical issues in public health communication interventions. Bioethics. 2004;18(6):531–552. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00415.x15580723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar