An economic evaluation of alternative test-intervention strategies to prevent spontaneous pre-term birth in singleton pregnancies

References

• Byrne B, Morrison JJ. Preterm birth. Clin Evid. 2004;(11):1903–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McPheeters ML, Miller WC, Hartmann KE, Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Garrett JM, The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1325–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola K, Ritari N, Tommiska V, Salokorpi T, Lehtonen L, Tammela O, Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age of a national cohort of extremely low birth weight infants who were born in 1996–1997. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Tiny Lives Charter: a cross-party call to tackle premature birth. TTL Policy paperV10 2008;14:33.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Eide GE, Roksund OD, Carlsen KH, Bakke P. Pulmonary outcome in adolescents of extreme preterm birth: a regional cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:1294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Eide GE, Roksund OD, Aksnes L, Oymar K. Characteristics of asthma and airway hyper-responsiveness after premature birth. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005;16:487–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone IM, Katz VL. The morbidity of the 34- to 35-week gestation: should we reexamine the paradigm? Am J Perinatol. 2004;21:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt SK, Sneed L, Phibbs CS. Costs of newborn care in California: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:154–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honest H, Forbes CA, Durée KH, Norman G, Duffy SB, Tsourapas A, Screening to prevent spontaneous preterm birth–systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2009;13(43).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Honest H. Risk screening for spontaneous preterm labour. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21:821–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrou S. Economic consequences of preterm birth and low birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110(S20):17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Song F, Altman DG, Glenny A-M, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;326:472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stika CS, Gross GA, Leguizamon G, Gerber S, Levy R, Mathur A, A prospective randomized safety trial of celecoxib for treatment of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:653–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawdy RJ, Lye S, Fisk NM, Bennett PR. A double-blind randomized study of fetal side effects during and after the short-term maternal administration of indomethacin, sulindac, and nimesulide for the treatment of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1046–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman H, Shalev E, Gilad G, Katzuni E. Further study of the inhibition of premature labor by indomethacin. Part II double-blind study. J Perinat Med. 1984;12:25–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen AC, Morup L, Hansen KB. Antibiotic elimination of group-B streptococci in urine in prevention of preterm labour. Lancet. 1987;1:591–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez NJ, Smith PC, Gutierrez J. Periodontal therapy may reduce the risk of preterm low birth weight in women with periodontal disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2002;73:911–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen SF, Secher NJ, Tabor A, Weber T, Walker JJ, Gluud C. Randomised clinical trials of fish oil supplementation in high risk pregnancies. Fish Oil Trials In Pregnancy (FOTIP) Team. BJOG. 2000;107:382–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Fonseca EB, Bittar RE, Carvalho MH, Zugaib M. Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:419–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartikainen-Sorri AL, Kauppila A, Tuimala R. Inefficacy of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of prematurity in twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;56:692–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, III, Brekken AL, Hauth JM. The effect of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on pregnancy outcome in an active-duty military population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:187–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JW, Austin KL, Jones GS, Davis GH, King TM. Efficacy of 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of premature labor. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:675–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, Dombrowski MP, Sibai B, Moawad AH, Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papiernik E. Double blind study of an agent to prevent preterm delivery among women at increased risk. Edition Schering, Serie IV, fiche 3, 1970:65–8.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Tocolytic drugs for women in preterm labour. Clinical Guideline No.1(B), 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. Guideline No.7, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis L, Netten A. Unit costs of health and social care. Personal Social Services Research Unit, Canterbury: University of Kent, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:i–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:i–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draper, Prediction of survival for preterm births. Br Med J. 2003, Available online at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/319/7217/1093/DC1.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, Tanis R. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updates with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatrics. 2003;3:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan MEI. Mortality Statistics – Birmingham Women's Hospital, 2004/5.
   Google Scholar
• Kosasa TS, Abou-Sayf FK, Li-Ma G, Hale RW. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of home monitoring of uterine contractions. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:71S-5S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport C, Elley K, Salas C, Taylor-Weetham CL, Fry-Smith A, Bryan S, The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine dental checks: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(7).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland, Barrett. Available online at: http://www.hollandandbarrett.com/ (accessed July 15, 2006)
   Google Scholar