References
- Kolås T, Hofoss D, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, Häger R, Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:864–70.
- The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Cesarean section 2008. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway 2009 August 14. Available online at: URL: http://mfr-nesstar.uib.no/mfr/index.jsp?study=http%3A%2F%2Fmfr-nesstar.uib.no%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2Ftv_f10c_i2b_keisersnitt&mode=cube&v=2&cube=http%3A%2F%2Fmfr-nesstar.uib.no%3A80%2Fobj%2FfCube%2Ftv_f10c_i2b_keisersnitt_C1&top=yes (cited August 14 2009).
- Hodnett ED, Downe S, Edwards N, Walsh D. Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Available online at: URL: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000012/frame.html (cited August 14 2009). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD000012.
- Robertson E, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Do foreign-born women in Sweden have an increased risk of non-normal childbirth? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:825–32.
- Paranjothy S, Frost C, Thomas J. How much variation in CS rates can be explained by case mix differences? BJOG. 2005;112:658–66.
- Ray CL, Carayol M, Zeitlin J, Breart G, Goffinet F, for the PREMODA Study Group. Level of perinatal care of the maternity unit and rate of cesarean in low-risk nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1269–77.
- Voldner N, Frøslie KF, Haakstad LAH, Bø K, Henriksen T. Birth complications, overweight and physical inactivity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:550–5.
- Gregory KD. Monitoring, risk adjustment and strategies to decrease cesarean rates. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;12: 481–6.
- Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:287–93.
- Seshadri L, Mukherjee B. A predictive model for cesarean section in low risk pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 89:94–8.