The Effect of Paracervical Block on Cervical Dilatation and Uterine Activity

References

• Alvarez H., Caldeyro-Barcia R. The normal and abnormal contractile waves of the uterus during labour. Gynaecologia (Basel) 1954; 138: 190
   Google Scholar
• Andersson K.-E., Gennser G., Nilsson E. Contractility of isolated human foetal hearts: Influence of contraction rate, acid-base parameters and local anaesthetic. Acta Physiol Scand, suppl. 1970; 353: 1–47
   Google Scholar
• Bengisson Ph L. The sponge-tipped catheter-a modification of the open-end catheter for recording of myometrial activity in vivo. J Reprod Fert 1968; 16: 115
   Google Scholar
• Brown E. O., Engel T., Douglas R. G. Para-cervical block analgesia in labor. Obstet Gynec (NY) 1965; 26: 195
   Google Scholar
• Caldeyro Barcia R., Alvarez H. J Obstet Gynec Brit Emp 1952; 59: 646
   Google Scholar
• Cooper K., Moir Ch J. Paracervical nerve block. A simple method of pain relief in labour. Brit Med J 1963; 1372
   Google Scholar
• Csapo A. I. Smooth muscle as a contractile unit. InProceedings of a symposium on vascular muscle. Physiol Rev, suppl. 1962; 5: 7–33
   Google Scholar
• Voe S. J., DeVoe K., Jr, Rigsby W. C., McDaniels Betty A. Effect of meperidine on uterine contractility. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1969; 105: 1004
   Google Scholar
• Friedman E. A. Labor. Clinical Evaluation and Management. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1967; 27–41
   Google Scholar
• Haverkamp A., Bowes W. A., Jr. Uterine perforation: A complication of continuous fetal monitoring. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1971; 10: 661
   Google Scholar
• Ingelman-Sundberg A. Praktiska synpunkter pâ paracervikalblcckad. Sv Lakartidn 1970; 67: 338
   Google Scholar
• Jindal M. N., Patel M. A. Oxytocic effect of lignocaine and its recently synthesized analogues. Ind J Physiol Fharmacol 1965; 9: 167
   Google Scholar
• Jung H., Kopecky P., Klõck F. K. Die fetale Gefahrdung durch die "Parazervikalblockaden". Ge-burtsh u Frauenheilk 1969; 29: 519
   Google Scholar
• Karlson S. On ths motility of the uterus during labour and the influence of the motility pattern on the duration of the labour. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1949; 28: 209
   Google Scholar
• Kobak A. J., Sadove M. S., Mazeros W. T. Anatomic studies of transvaginal regional anesthesia. Roentgenographic visualization of neural pathways. Obstet Gynec (NY) 1962; 19: 302
   Google Scholar
• Kobak A. J., Sadove M. S. Combined paracervical and pudendal nsrve blocks-a simple form of trans-vaginal regional anesthesia. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1961; 81: 72
   Google Scholar
• Krapohl A. J., Myers G. G., Caldeyro-Barcia R. Uterine contractions in spontaneous labor. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1970; 706: 378
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren L. The lower part of the uterus during th; first stage of labour in occipito-anterior vertex presentation. Studies by means of intrauterine toco-graphy. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1955; 34(suppl. 2)1–79
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren L. Die Einwirkung der Grosse des Fetus auf die normale Erôffnung der Cervix. Arch Gynak 1961; 794: 460
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren L. The engagement of the foetal head in the uterus when the vertex presents. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1972; 51: 37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren L., Siëner H. Cervical tension during labor. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1966; 95: 414
   Google Scholar
• McGaughey H. S., Corey E. L., Eastwood D., Thornton W. N. Effect of synthetic anesthetics on the spontaneous motility of human uterine muscle in vitro. Obstet Gynec (NY) 1962; 79: 233
   Google Scholar
• Morandi C. L'anestesia paracervicale in traviglio di parto. Arch Ostet Ginecol (Napoli) 1968; 73: 537
   Google Scholar
• Mosler K.-H. The dynamics of uterine muscle. Bibliolh:ca Gynaecologica No. 48. Advances in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A. Reist. S. Karger, Basel and New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Narik G. The method of transfer of labour contractions to the contents of the uterus. J Obstet Gynaec Brit Emp 1959; 66: 58
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin R. M., Goddard W. B. Paracervical and uterosacral block in obstetrics-a controlled, double-blind study. Obstet Gynec (NY) 1963; 27: 737
   Google Scholar
• Ranney B. Paracervical block for first-stage pain in primigravidas. Obstet Gynec (NY) 1966; 27: 757
   Google Scholar
• Sandmire H. F., Austin S. D. Paracervical block anesthesia in obstetrics. J Amer Med Ass 1964; 187: 775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild H. O., Fitzpatrick R. J., Nixon W. C. W. Activity of the human cervix and corpus uteri. Their response to drugs in early pregnancy. Lancet 1951; 7: 250
   Google Scholar
• Schwalm H., Dubrauszky V. The structure of the musculature of the human uterus-muscle and connective tissue. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1966; 94: 391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen M. Paracervikal blokade. Ugeskr Laeg 1967; 729: 1106
   Google Scholar
• Ushinsky M. The effect of procaine on the uterine contractility. Akuserstvo i Ginekologia (Moskva) 1966; 6: 17
   Google Scholar
• Van Praagh I. G. L., Povey W. G. Paracervical block anaesthesia in labour. Canad Anaes Sec J 1967; 14: 232
   Google Scholar
• Westholm H., Magno R., Berg A. A. Experiences with paracervical block. A double-blind study with bupivacaine (Marcaine®). Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 1970; 49: 335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs G., Leeuwen M., vanRottinghuis H., Boeles Th J.F. An electromyographic study of the human uterus during labor. Obstet Gynec (NY) 1971; 37: 241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood C. Myometrial contractility in pregnancy and labour. Modern Trends in Obstetrics, R. J. Kellar. Butterworths, London 1969; vol. IV: 64–68
   Google Scholar
• Zourlas P. A., Kumar D. An objective evaluation of paracervical block on human uterine contractility. Amer J Obstet Gynec 1965; 91: 217
   Google Scholar