X-Ray Pelvimetry and trial of Labor After Previous Cesarean Section: A prospective study

References

• Barton J J., Garbaciak J A., Ryan G M. The efficacy of X-ray pelvimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti T J., Platt L, Druzin M. Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section for a nonrecurrent cause. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 358
   Google Scholar
• Borell U, Fernström I. Radiologic pelvimetry. Acta Radiol 1960, Suppl. 191
   Google Scholar
• Borell U, Rådberg C. Orthodiagraphic pelvimetry with special reference to capacity of distal part of pelvis and pelvic outlet. Acta Radiol Diagn 1964; 2: 273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson C, Nybell-Lindahl G, Ingemarsson I. Extra-dural block in patients who had previously undergone caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove R A. Management of pregnancy and delivery following cesarean section. JAMA 1951; 145: 884
   Google Scholar
• Cragin E. Conservatism in obstetrics. NY State J Med 1916; 104: l
   Google Scholar
• Demianczuk N N., Hunter D JS, Taylor D W. Trial of labor after previous cesarean section: Prognostic indicators of outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl J, Fernström I. Radiologic pelvimetry with special reference to widest transverse diameter of pelvic inlet. Acta Radiol Diagn 1966; 4: 557
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas R G., Birnbaum S J., MacDonald F A. Pregnancy and labor following cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 86: 961
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs C E. Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenhill J P., Friedman E A. Evaluation of the pelvis. Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics. W.B. Saunders company, Philadelphia-London-Toronto 1974; 155
   Google Scholar
• Lavin J P., Stephens R J., Miodovnik M, Barden T P. Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh C, Wilbrand H, Lindmark G. Röntgenologisk bäckenmätning—ett pålitligt underlag för val av för-lossningsmetod?, Personal communication
   Google Scholar
• Martin J N., Harris B A., Huddleston J F., Morrison J C., Propst M G., Wiser W L., Perlis H W., Davidson J T. Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 225
   Google Scholar
• Meier P R., Porreco R P. Trial of labor following cesarean section: A two-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill B S., Gibbs C E. Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moldin P, Hökegård K H., Nielsen T F. Cesarean section and maternal mortality in Sweden 1973—1979. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morewood G A., O'Sullivan M J., McConney J. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 42: 589
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen T F., Hökegård K H. The course of subsequent pregnancies after previous cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen T F., Hökegård K H. Cesarean section and intra-operative surgical complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen T F., Hökegård K H. Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsén H. Radiologic low-dose pelvimetry. Indications and pelvimetry data. Acta Radiol Diagn 1980; 21: 747
   Google Scholar
• Riva H, Teich J. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 81: 501
   Google Scholar
• Russel J GB. Radiology in Obstetrics and Antenatal Paediatrics. Butterworth & Co. Ltd., London 1973
   Google Scholar
• Saldana L R., Schulman H, Reuss L. Management of pregnancy after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therkelsen A J. Medicinsk statistik. 5th ed. Akademisk Forlag, Köbenhavn 1979; 140
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Health and Human Services: Cesarean Childbirth. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1981, Publication No. 82–2067
   Google Scholar