References
- Siegler A M, Perez R J. Reconstruction of fallopian tubes in previously sterilized patients. Fertil Steril 1975; 26: 383
- Siegler A M, Hulka J, Peretz A. Reversibility of female sterilization. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 499
- Siegler A M. Replacement, repair, and removal of fallopian tubes. Fertil Steril 1982; 37: 611
- Thranov I, Hertz J, Ryttov N. Profile of Danish women undergoing reversal of sterilization 1978–83. Acta Ob-stet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 269
- Winston R ML. Microsurgery of the fallopian tube: From fantasy to reality. Fertil Steril 1980; 34: 521
- Gomel V. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization. A reappraisal. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 587
- Rock J A, Bergquist C A, Zacur H A, Parmley T H, Guzick D S, Jones H W. Tubal anastomosis following unipolar cautery. Fertil Steril 1982; 37: 613
- DeCherney A H, Mezer H C, Naftolin F. Analysis of failure of microsurgical anastomosis after midsegment non-coagulation tubal ligation. Fertil Steril 1983; 39: 618
- Henderson S R. The reversibility of female sterilization with the use of microsurgery: A report of 102 patients with more than one year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 57
- Paterson P J. Factors influencing the success of microsurgical tuboplasty for sterilization reversal. Clin Re-prod Fertil 1985; 3: 57
- Spivak M M, Librach C L, Rosenthal D M. Microsurgical reversal of sterilization: A six-year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 355
- Henderson S R. Reversal of female sterilization: Comparison of microsurgical and gross surgical technique for tubal anastomosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 73
- Silber S J, Cohen R. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: Factors affecting pregnancy rate, with long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 679
- Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F, Ferin J. Macroscopic and microscopic studies of fallopian tube after laparoscopic sterilization. Contraception 1979; 20: 498
- Vasques G, Winston R ML., Boeckx W. BrosensI.Tubal lesions subsequent to sterilization and their relation to fertility after attempts at reversal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 86