The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy

References

• SBU. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Routine ultrasound under pregnancy, report, September 1998. ISBN 91-87890-52-6, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Amini H, Antonsson P, Papadogiannakis N, Ericson K, Pilo C, Eriksson L, Comparison of ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1208–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand IR, Kaminopetros P, Cave M, Irving HC, Lilford RJ. Specificity of antenatal ultrasound in the Yorkshire Region: a prospective study of 2261 ultrasound detected anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:392–7.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll C, Tenconi R, Clementi M. Detection of congenital anomalies by fetal ultrasonographic examination across Europe. Community Genet. 2001;4:225–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, Eriksson L, Norsted T. Second trimester ultrasound screening performed by midwives; sensitivity for detection of fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:98–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard N, Raybaud C, Dercole C, Boubli L, Chau C, Cahen S, In vivo MRI of the fetal brain. Neuroradiology. 1993;35:431–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resta M, Greco P, D'Addario V, Florio C, Dardes N, Caruso G, Magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy: study of fetal cerebral malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4:7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sonigo PC, Rypens FF, Carteret M, Delezoide AL, Brunelle FO. MR imaging of fetal cerebral anomalies. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:212–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kanal E, Gillen J, Evans JA, Savitz DA, Shellock FG. Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers. Radiology. 1993;187:395–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley Jr WG, Froelich JW, ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1447–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:32–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip YP, Capriotti C, Talagala SL, Yip JW. Effects of MR exposure at 1.5 T on early embryonic development of the chick. J Magn Reson Imag 1994;4:742–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shellock FG, Kanal E. Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. SMRI Safety Committee. J Magn Reson Imag 1991;1:97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Content and Review of a Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Device 510(k). Application. Washington DC: FDA, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson IR, Symonds EM, Kean DM, Worthington BS, Broughton Pipkin F, Hawkes RC, Imaging the pregnant human uterus with nuclear magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:1136–9.
   Google Scholar
• Levine D, Hatabu H, Gaa J, Atkinson MW, Edelman RR. Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:905–8.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Stark DD, Callen PW, Golbus MS, Hricak H. Magnetic resonance imaging of fetal anomalies in utero: early experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145:677–82.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Expert Committee. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: WHO, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby EH, Paley MN, Sprigg A, Rutter S, Davies NP, Wilkinson ID, Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG. 2004;111:784–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR, Abbott J, Mehta T, Edelman RR. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:1011–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail KM, Ashworth JR, Martin WL, Chapman S, McHugo J, Whittle MJ, Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: 3-year experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:185–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhances fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:553–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K, Ryynanen, Kirkinen P. Magnetic resonance imaging supplements ultrasonographic imaging of the posterior fossa, pharynx and neck in malformed fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13:327–34.
   Google Scholar
• Levine D, Barnes PD, Robertson RR, Wong G, Mehta TS. Fast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Radiology. 2003;229:51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twickler DM, Magee KP, Caire J, Zaretsky M, Fleckenstein JL, Ramus RM. Second-opinion magnetic resonance imaging for suspected fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:492–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, Ben-Aroya Z, Kidron D, Lerman-Sagie T. Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:333–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV, Filly RA, Broderick KC, Musci TJ, Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1688–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breysem L, Bosmans H, Dymarkowski S, Schoubroeck DV, Witters I, Deprest J, The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1538–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Amin M, Perlitz Y, Peleg D. Transvaginal sonographic appearance of the cerebellar vermis at 14–16 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:208–9.
   Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:42–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Normal sonographic development of the central nervous system from the second trimester onwards using 2D, 3D and transvaginal sonography. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:326–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller GM, Weiner CP, Yankowitz J. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal head and spine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:372–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll SG, Porter H, Abdel-Fattah S, Kyle PM, Soothill PW. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:149–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:41–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitby EH, Variend S, Rutter S, Paley MN, Wilkinson ID, Davies NP, Corroboration of in utero MRI using post-mortem MRI and autopsy in foetuses with CNS abnormalities. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1114–20.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, Jones A, Wilkinson ID, Paley MN, Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:22–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistorius LR, Hellmann PM, Visser GH, Malinger G, Prayer D. Fetal neuroimaging: ultrasound, MRI, or both? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63:733–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar