Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy: A randomized trial versus laparotomy

References

• Bruhat M A, Manhes H, Mage G, Pouly J L. Treatment of ectopic pregnancy by means of laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 411–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dashefsky S M, Lyons E A, Levi C S, Lindsay D J. Suspected ectopic pegnancy: Endovaginal and transvaginal US. Radiology 1988; 169: 181–4
   Google Scholar
• Fossum G T, Davajan V, Kletzky O A. Early detection of pregnancy with transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 788–91
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro B S, Cullen M, Taylor K J W, DeCherney A H. Transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 425–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Kadar N, Copel JA, Jeanty P, DeCherney AH, Hobbins JC. The value of serial human chorionic gonadotropin testing as a diagnostic tool in ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 392–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMaistre A, Bracey A, Katz A, Wu AHB. Role of qualitative choriogonadotropin assays in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Chem 1987; 33: 1908–10
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom B, Hahlin M, Sjoblom P. Serial human gonadotropin determination by fluoroimmunoassay for differentiation between intrauterine and ectopic gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 397–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorburn J, Philipson M, Lindblom B. Background factors of ectopic pregnancy. XI. Risk estimation by means of a logistic model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 23: 333–40
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn J, Philipson M, Lindblom B. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy in relation to background factors and surgical treatment. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 595–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomivaara L, Kauppila A. Radical or conservative surgery for ectopic pregnancy? A follow-up study of fertility of 323 patients. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 580–3
   Google Scholar
• Magos A, Baumann R, Turnbull A. Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1988; 17: 694
   Google Scholar
• Levine R L. Economic impact of pelviscopic surgery. J Reprod Med 1985; 30: 655–9
   Google Scholar
• DeCherney A, Kase N. The conservative surgical management of unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 451–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallatt J G. Tubal conservation in ectopic pregnancy: A study of 200 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 1216–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouly J L, Mahnes H, Mage G, Canis M, Bruhat M A. Conservative laparoscopic treatment of 321 ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1093–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright P S, Herbert C M, Maxson W S. Operative laparoscopy for the management of tubal pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 589–91
   Google Scholar
• Silva P D. A laparoscopic approach can be applied to most cases of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 944–7
   Google Scholar
• Henderson S R. Ectopic tubal pregnancy treated by operative laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1462–9
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn J E K, Janson P O, Lindstedt G. Early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 543–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson K, Siitari H, Hemmilä I, et al. Time-resolved flouroimmunoassay of human choriogonadotropi. Clin Chern 1983; 29: 60–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlin M J. The human corpus luteum. Studies on its regulation in the menstrual cycle and in early pregnancy. University of Göteborg, Sweden 1988, Dissertation (ISBN 91–7900-462–8)
   Google Scholar
• Bradley J W. Distribution-free statistical test. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs 1968; 68
   Google Scholar
• Brumsted J, Kessler C, Gibson C, Nakajima S, Riddick DH, Gibson M. A comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 889–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 400–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecke H, Semm K. Lehmann-Willenbrock E. Results of operative pelviscopy in 202 cases of ectopic pregnancy. Int J Fertil 1989; 34: 93–100
   Google Scholar
• Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Thorburn J, Kallfelt B, Lindblom B. Laparoscopic surgery versus conventional conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy. 1989, Presented at the Second World Congress of Gynecologic Endoscopy, June 5–8, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff J D. The histopathology of the developing tubal pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1980; 34: 169–71
   Google Scholar
• Pauerstein C J, Crozatid H B, Eddy C A, Ramzy J, Walters M D. Anatomy and pathology of tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 301–8
   Google Scholar
• Senterman M, Jibodh R, Tulandi T. Histopathologic study of ampullary and isthmic tubal ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 939–41
   Google Scholar