References
- Ahlgre M, Ingemarsson I, Lindberg L G, Nordqvist S R B. Conization as treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 46: 135–40
- Ostergard D R. Prediction of clearance of cervival intraepithelial neoplasia by conization. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56: 77–80
- Burghardt E, Holzer E. Treatment of carcinoma in situ; Evaluation of 1,609 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 539–45
- Benedet J L, Anderson G H, Simpson M L, Shaw D. Colposcopy, conization and hysterectomy practices: A current perspective. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 539–45
- Abdul-Karim F D, Nunez C. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization: A study of 522 consecutive cones. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 77–81
- Buxton E J, Luesley D M, Wade-Evans T, Jordan J A. Residual disease after cone biopsy: Completeness of excision and follow-up cytology as predictive factors. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 529–32
- Presley J J, Hernandez E, Mudafort E, Miyazawa K. Endometrial and endocervical curettage at the time of cervical conization. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 99–102
- Husseinzaddeh N, Shbaro I, Wesseler T. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncology 1989; 33: 198–200
- Varga A. Prognostic accuracy of cervical cone biopsy in determination of the management of carcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964; 90: 957–61