References
- Lilford R J, Watson A J. Commentary. Has in-vitro fertilization made salpingostomy obsolete?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 557–60
- Winston R M, Margara R A. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 637–42
- Schlaff W D, Hassiakos D K, Damewood M D, Rock J A. Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction: prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 984–90
- Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F. Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 200–4
- Watson A J S, Gupta J K, O'Donovan R, Dalton M E, Lilford R J. The results of tubal surgery in the treatment of infertility in two non-specialist hospitals. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 561–8
- Singhal V, Li T C, Cooke I D. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 628–36
- Dubuisson J B, Chapron C, Morice P X, Aubriot F, Foulot H, de Joliniere J B. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: Fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 334–9
- Swolin K. Electromicrosurgery and salpingostomy: long term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 121: 418–9
- Russell J B, DeCherney A H, Laufer N, Polan M L, Naftolin F. Neosalpingostomy: comparison of 24- and 72-month follow-up time shows increased pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 296–8
- Bateman B G, Nunley W C, Kitchin J D, III. Surgical management of distal tubal obstruction - are we making progress?. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 523–42
- Vasquez G, Winston R L M, Boeckx W, Gordts S, Brosens I A. The epithelium of human hydrosalpinges: a light optical and scanning electron microscopic study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 764–70
- Reiss H. Management of tubal infertility in the 1990's. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 619–23
- Rock J A, Atayama P, Martin E J, Woodruff J D, Jones H W. Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 591–6
- Gomel V, Taylor P J. In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery. J of Assisted Reprod Genetics 1992; 9: 306–9
- FIVNAT. French national 1VF registry: analysis of to 1990 data. Fertil Steril 1986; 59: 587–90
- Strandell A, Walderström U, Nielsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro-fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 861–3
- Andersen A N, Yue Z, Meng F J, Petersen K. Low implantation rate after IVF in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1935–8
- Boer-Meisel M E, te Velde E R, Habbema J D F, Kardaun J W P F. Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 23–9
- Mage G, Pouly J-L, de Joliniere J B, Chabrand S, Riouallon A, Bruhat M-A. A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 807–10
- The American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classification of adnexal adsoins, distal tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 944–55