Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite

References

• Mante F, Saleh N, Mante M. Softening patterns of post-cure heattreated dental composites. Dent Mater 1993;9:325–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003;31:395–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:185–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:480–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Mechanical property analysis of two admixed PRIMM-modified commercial dental composites. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:238.
   Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water―effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42:465–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:484–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Heumen CC, van Dijken JW, Tanner J, Pikaar R, Lassila LV, Creugers NH, Five-year survival of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures in the anterior area. Dent Mater 2009;25:820–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagis B, Ustaomer S, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Provisional repair of a zirconia fixed partial denture with fibre-reinforced restorative composite: a clinical report. J Canadian Dent Assoc 2009;75:133–7.
   Google Scholar
• Uctasli S, Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The degree of conversion of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized using different light-curing sources. Dent Mater 2005;21:469–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK. Survival rates of resin-bonded, glass fiber reinforced composite fixed partial dentures with a mean follow-up of 42 months: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:241–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter AV. Direct resin-based composites: Current recommendations for optimal clinical results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:481–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. Mosby: St. Louis, MO; 2002. p. 237.
   Google Scholar
• Darvell BW. Material science for dentistry, 7th ed. Hong Kong, PRC: University of Hong Kong; 2002. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Baltzer A, Kaufmann-Jinoian V. VITA CAD-Temp for in Lab and Cerec 3D. Int J Comput Dent 2007;10:99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:947–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. The application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard NY. Advanced use of an esthetic indirect posterior resin system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:1044–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mörmann WH. The evaluation of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. Int J Prost 2010;23:223–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: The impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength. Dent Mater 2009;25:188–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites. Characterising discrete filler particles and nanoclusters using a novel micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater 2009;25:180–7.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite. J Dent 2008;36:186–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Dos Santos Cruz CA, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of indirect composite resins: effects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1085–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:353–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2006;76:114–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calheiros F, Kawano Y, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of radiant exposure on concentration stress, degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:799–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moraes RR, Gonçalves Lde S, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent 2009;34:551–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:51–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila LVJ, Nohrström T, Vallittu PK. The influence of short-term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite. Biomaterials 2002;23:2221–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones M, Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Effects of branched-fiber filler additions on dental composite mechanical properties. J Dent Res 1997;76:76.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp MM, Thompson JY, Bayne SC, Rathbun K. Development of pre-polymerized branched-fiber filler particles. J Dent Res 1998;77:518.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddle DE, Maloney MM, Thompson IY. Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater 2002;18:72–80.
   Google Scholar
• Keulemans F, Lassila LV, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of framework design on the load-bearing capacity of laboratory-made inlay-retained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses. J Biomech 2009;42:844–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer H, Weber M, Eck M, Erdrich A, Marx R. Finite element and experimental analyses of polymer-based dental bridges reinforced by ceramic bars. J Biomech 2004;37:289–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prost 1993;6:462–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tinschert J, Natt G, Doose B, Fischer H, Marx R. High performance ceramic posterior bridges. Dtsch Zahnarztliche Z 1999;54:545–50.
   Google Scholar