Finite element stress analysis of Ti-6Al-4V and partially stabilized zirconia dental implant during clenching

References

• Lindhe J, Lang NP, Karring T. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 5th ed. London: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lang NP, Brägger U, Hammerle CH, Sutter F. Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. I. Rationale, clinical procedures and 30-month results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:154–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brägger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration (II). A cross-sectional study comparing the clinical outcome 1 year after immediate to standard implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:268–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caneva M, Botticelli D, Stellini E, Souza SL, Salata LA, Lang NP. Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:512–7
   Google Scholar
• Matinlinna JP, Lassila LVJ, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Isocyanato- and methacryloxysilanes promote bis-GMA adhesion to titanium. J Dental Res 2005;84:360–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Archs Oral Biol 1993;38:491–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Shi S, LeGeros RZ, LeGeros JP. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of four designs of a high-strength silicon nitride implant. Implant Dentistry 2000;9:53–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y, Kaneko T, Nakajima T. Finite element analysis of the stresses around endosseous implants in various reconstructed mandibular models. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2002;30:170–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrisnard L, Hure G, Barquins M, Chappard D. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:353–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodontics 2002;11:30–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menicucci G, Mossolov A, Mozzati M, Lorenzetti M, Preti G. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:334–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DF. Titanium as a metal for implantation. Part 2: biological properties and clinical applications. J Med Eng Technol 1977;1:266–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. The Branemark osseointegrated implant. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano R, Sabeosa CE. Zirconia: material background and clinical application. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:710–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, Mahn E, Lammers L, Handschel J, Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface. Head Face Medicine 2008;6:25.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008;24:289–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenoble DE. Design criteria for dental implant. Oral Implantol 1975;5:44–64.
   Google Scholar
• Munir AZ, Richards WL, Prado ME. Photoelastic studies of the stress distribution on blade type endosteal dental implants. Oral Implantol 1975;5:296–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Fraunhofer JA. The finite element method of stress analysis and its application to dental problems. London: Scientific Aspects of Dental Materials; 1975. p 41–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lavernia CJ, Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM. The effects of implant elastic modulus on the stress distribution surrounding dental implants. In: Simon BR, editor. International Conference Proceedings, Finite Elements in Biomechanics. The University of Arizona; 1980. p 179–82.
   Google Scholar
• Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R, Chao EYS. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. J Biomechanics 1983;16:385–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adam WK, Tanquist RA. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:223–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degerliyurt K, Simsek B, Erkmen E, Eser A. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglar A, Bal BT, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Ozkan S. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, da Silva Barra LP, Cruz S. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:391–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargahi J, Najarian S, Talebi M. Analysis of the effects of different materials in a tooth implant-supported fixed prosthesis using finite element method. Biomed Mater Eng 2005;15:317–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainland D, Hiltz EJ. Forces exerted on the human mandible by the muscles of mastication. J Dent Res 1934;14:107–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barbenel JC. The biomechanics of the temporomandibular joint: a theoretical study. J Biomechanics 1972;5:251–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher GH. Funktionelle morphologie der kinnmuskulatur. Jena: Fisher; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Pruim GJ, De Jongh HJ, Ten Bosch JJ. Forces acting on the mandible during bilateral static bite at different bite force levels. J Biomechanics 1980;13:755–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul JP. Forces transmitted by joints in the human body. Proc Inst Mech Engng 1966;181:8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison JB. The forces transmitted by the human knee joint during activity. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Dissertation; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson J. Biomechanics of the leg. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Dissertation; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Sicher H, Du Brul EL. Oral anatomy. St Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby Co; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne R. Microscopic anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Sydney: University of Sydney, Dissertation; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hylander WL. Incisal bite force direction in humans and the functional significance of mammalian mandibular translation. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;48:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashman RB, Van Buskirk WC. The elastic properties of a human mandible. Adv Dent Res 1987;1:64–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dechow PC, Nail GA, Schwartz-Dabney CL, Ashman RB. Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993;90:291–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pithioux M, Lasaygues P, Chabrand P. An alternative ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of cortical bone. J. Biomechanics 2002:35:961–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendts FJ, Sigolotto C. Standard measurements, elastic values and tensile strength behavior of the human mandible, a contribution to the biomechanics of the mandible – I. Biomed Technik 1989;34:248–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arendts FJ, Sigolotto C. Mechanical characteristics of the human mandible and study of in vivo behavior of compact bone tissue, a contribution to the description of biomechanics of the mandible – II. Biomed Technik 1990;35:123–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner CH, Cowin SC, Rho JY, Ashman RB, Rice JC. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J Biomechanics 1990;23:549–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar