References
- Lloyd CH, Scrimgeour SN, Brown D, Clarke RL, Curtis RV, Hatton PV, Dental materials: 1994 literature review. J Dent 1996;24:153–84.
- Brunton PA, Christensen GJ, Cheung SW, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics. Brit Dent J 2005;198:99–103.
- Coppi C, Devincenzi CP, Bortolini S, Consolo U, Tiozzo R. A new generation of sterile and radiopaque impression materials - an in vitro cytotoxicity study. J Biomater Appl 2007;22:83–95.
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4823 dental materials: elastomeric impression materials. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2000.
- International Standards for Organization. ISO 10993-1 biological evaluation of medical devices–Part 1. Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. 4th en. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2009.
- International Standards for Organization. ISO 7405 dentistry — Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2008.
- Ciapetti G, Granchi D, Stea S, Savarino L, Verri E, Gori A, Cytotoxicity testing of materials with limited in vivo exposure is affected by the duration of cell-material contact. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42:485–90.
- Sydiskis RJ, Gerhardt DE. Cytotoxicity of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:431–5.
- Chen SY, Chen CC, Kuo HW. Cytotoxicity of dental impression materials. B Environ Contam Tox 2002;69:350–5.
- Roberta T, Federico M, Federica B, Antonietta CM, Serglo B, Ugo C. Study of the potential cytotoxicity of dental impression materials. Toxicol in Vitro 2003;17:657–62.
- Lang H, Mertens T. The use of cultures of human osteoblast-like cells as an in vitro test system for dental materials. J Oral Maxil Surg 1990;48:606–11.
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993-5 biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 5. Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2009.
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993-12 biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 12. Sample preparation and reference materials. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2002.
- Ishiyama M, Shiga M, Sasamoto K, Mizoguchi M, He PG. A new sulfonated tetrazolium salt that produces a highly water-soluble formazan dye. Chem Pharm Bull 1993;41:1118–22.
- Wennberg A, Mjor IA, Hensten-Pettersen A. Biological evaluation of dental restorative materials–a comparison of different test methods. J Biomed Mater Res 1983;17:23–36.
- Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Sun ZL. In vitro models of biocompatibility: a review. Dent Mater 1996;12:186–93.
- Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:203–9.
- Schedle A, Samorapoompichit P, Rauschfan XH, Franz A, Fureder W, Sperr WR, Response of L-929 fibroblasts, human gingival fibroblasts, and human tissue mast-cells to various metal-cations. J Dent Res 1995;74:1513–20.
- Browne RM. The in vitro assessment of the cytotoxicity of dental materials–does it have a role? Int Endod J 1988;21:50–8.