Zygomaticofacial foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computed tomography

References

• BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:156–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:219–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pelayo JL, Diago MP, Bowen EM, Diago MP. Intraoperative complications during oral implantology. Med Oral Patol Oral 2008;13:E239–E43.
   Google Scholar
• Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S, Pauwels M, Naert I. Image-based planning and clinical validation of zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ella B, Noble RD, Lauverjat Y, Sedarat C, Zwetyenga N, Siberchicot F, et al. Septa within the sinus: effect on elevation of the sinus floor. Br J Oral Max Surg 2008;46:464–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kainulainen VT, Sandor GK, Clokie CM, Keller AM, Oikarinen KS. The zygomatic bone as a potential donor site for alveolar reconstruction-a quantitative anatomic cadaver study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:786–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martins C, Li X, Rhoton AL Jr. Role of the zygomaticofacial foramen in the orbitozygomatic craniotomy: anatomic report. Neurosurgery 2003;53:168–72; 172–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangal A, Choudhry R, Tuli A, Choudhry S, Khera V. Incidence and morphological study of zygomaticofacial and zygomatico-orbital foramina in dry adult human skulls: the non-metrical variants. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:96–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang SH, Jin S, Hwang K. Location of the zygomaticofacial foramen related to malar reduction. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:872–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loukas M, Owens DG, Tubbs RS, Spentzouris G, Elochukwu A, Jordan R. Zygomaticofacial, zygomaticoorbital and zygomaticotemporal foramina: anatomical study. Anat Sci Int 2008;83:77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksu F, Ceri NG, Arman C, Zeybek FG, Tetik S. Location and incidence of the zygomaticofacial foramen: an anatomic study. Clin Anat 2009;22:559–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Radiographic planning and the assessment of endosseous oral implants. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kamburoglu K, Kilic C, Oezen T, Yueksel SP. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Oral Surg Oral Med O 2009;107:E34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, Lopez-Quiles J. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E307–12.
   Google Scholar
• Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:265–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:402–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, et al. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:309–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:79–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:767–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chrcanovic BR, Abreu MH. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;17:81–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Lee KJ, Baik HS. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:600 e23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar