Bolton tooth size ratio and its relation with arch widths, arch length and arch perimeter: A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study

References

• Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Evaluation of the validity of the Bolton Index using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:878–83.
   Google Scholar
• Alam MK, Iida J. Overjet, overbite and dental midline shift as predictors of tooth size discrepancy in a Bangladeshi population and a graphical overview of global tooth size ratios. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:1520–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Tamimi T, Hashim HA. Bolton tooth-size ratio revisited. World J Orthod 2005;6:289–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Othman SA, Harradine NW. Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios: a literature review. J Orthod 2006;33:45–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batool I, Abbas A, Rizvi SA, Abbas I. Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20:51–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962;48:504–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton WA. disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958;28:113–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kumar S, Singla A. Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients. Cont Clinical Dent 2011;2:170–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh SP, Goyal A. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of the permanent dentition in North Indian children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006;24:192–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaiswal AK, Paudel KR, Shrestha SL, Jaiswal S. Prediction of space available for unerupted permanent canine and premolars in a Nepalese population. J Orthod 2009;36:253–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahman A, Othman S. Comparison of tooth size discrepancy of three main ethnics in Malaysia with Bolton’s ratio. Sains Malays 2012;41:271–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie Q, Lin J. Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:539–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ta TA, Ling JY, Hagg U. Tooth-size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children. Am J orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:556–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo T, Shundo I, Abe R, Ishida K, Yoshino S, Shimooka S. Applicability of Bolton’s tooth size ratios to a Japanese orthodontic population. Odont Soc Nippon Dent Uni 2007;95:57–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabé E, Flores-Mir C. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums? An analysis of a Peruvian sample. Angle Orthod 2005;75:202–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire SM, Nishio C, Mendes Ade M, Quintao CC, Almeida MA. Relationship between dental size and normal occlusion in Brazilian patients. Braz Dent J 2007;18:253–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alkofide E, Hashim H. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion classes: a comparative study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;26:383–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baidas L, Hashim H. An anterior tooth size comparison in unilateral and bilateral congenitally absent maxillary lateral incisors. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:56–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uysal T, Sari Z. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and mesiodistal crown dimensions for a Turkish population. Am J orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:226–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batool I, Abbas A, Rizvi S, Abbas I. Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20:51–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kilkis D, Sezgin OS, Bayram M. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. Aust Orthod J 2013;29:153–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007;4:e297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Anderson PJ, Townsend GC. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:243–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakasima A, Terajima M, Mori N, Hoshino Y, Tokumori K, Aoki Y, et al. Three-dimensional computer-generated head model reconstructed from cephalograms, facial photographs, and dental cast models. Am J orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:282–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 2003;82:438–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha BK, Choi JI, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Jeong YM. Applications of three-dimensionally scanned models in orthodontics. Int J Comput Dent 2007;10:41–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agnihotri G, Gulati M. Maxillary molar and premolar indices in north Indians-A Dimorphic Study. Internet J Biol Anthropol 2008;2:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavelle CL. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972;61:29–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar