Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• WHO expert Committee on Dental Health World Health Organization. Standardization of reporting of dental diseases and conditions: report of an expert committee on dental Health 1962. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/38150. 14-20 November 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:CD003808.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: A review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J 2000;9:476–82.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne JW, Summitt JB. Extention for prevention: is it relevent today? Am J Dent 1998;11:189–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalli M, Çolak H, Mustafa Hamidi M. Minimal intervention concept: A new paradigm for operative dentistry. J Investig Clin Dent 2012;3:167–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman M, Kronman JH. A preliminary report on a chemomechanical means of removing caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:1149–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutzbank SG, Galaini J, Kronman JH, Goldman M, Clark RE. A comparative in vitro study of GK-101 and GK-101E in caries removal. J Dent Res 1978;57:861–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraghavan K, Kush A, Lakshminarayana C, Diwakar L, Ravikumar P, Patil S, et al. Chemomechanical Caries Removal: A Review & study of an indigen-ously developed agent (Carie Care (TM) Gel) In Children. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:84–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BM. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13:40–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavvadia K, Karagianni V, Polychronopoulou A, Papagiannouli L. Primary teeth caries removal using the carisolv chemomechanical method: A clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 2003;26:23–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;34:117–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: A comparitive clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;36:5–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajakumar S, Mungara J, Joseph E, Philip J, Shilpa Priya MP. Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: A comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;38:23–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo mechanical removal of caries. Caries Res 1999;33:171–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peric T, Markovic D, Petrovic B. Clinical evaluation of a chemomechanical method for caries removal in children and adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:277–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balciuniene I, Sabalaite R, Juskiene I. Chemomechanical caries removal for children. Stomatologija 2005;7:40–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergmann J, Leitão J, Kultje C, Bergmann D, João CM. Removing dentine caries in deciduous teeth with Carisolv: A randomised, controlled, prospective study with six-month follow-up, comparing chemomechanical treatment with drilling. Oral Health Prev Dent 2005;3:105–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lozano-Chourio MA, Zambrano O, Gonzalez H, Quero M. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv). Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:161–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) -computer program. Version 5.3 Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Soni HK, Sharma A, Sood PB. A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35:205–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters MC, Flamenbaum MH, Eboda NN, Feigal RJ, Inglehart MR. Chemomechanical caries removal in children: Efficacy and efficiency. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1658–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathuria V, Ankola AV, Hebbal M, Mocherla M. Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:3111–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwendicke F, Paris S, Tu YK. Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComb D. Caries-detector dyes-how accurate and useful are they? J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:195–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Gillet D, Guigand M, Kaleka R, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:32–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar