The influence of viewing conditions on observer performance in dental radiology

References

• Barr J H, Stephens R G. Dental radiology: pertinent basic concepts and their applications in clinical practice. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1980
   Google Scholar
• Reiskin A B. Advances in oral radiology. PSG Publishing Co., Boston, Mass. 1980
   Google Scholar
• Goaz P J, White S C. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. Mosby, St Louis 1982
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson O. Aspects of the interpretation of contrast and detail in radiographs. Acta Radiol 1952; 38: 477–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schober H, Klett C. Phantomuntersuchungen über den Einfluss der Bildbetrachtungsmetodik auf die Erkennbarkeit von details in der Röntgenauf-nahme. Rontgenblatter 1952; 5: 51–62
   Google Scholar
• Riebel F A. Use of the eyes in X-ray diagnosis. Radiology 1957; 70: 252–8
   Google Scholar
• Brynolf I. Improved viewing facilities for better roentgenodiagnosis. Oral Surg 1971; 32: 808–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baiter S, Janower M L. Radiographic viewing conditions. Proceedings of the society of photo-optical instrumentation engineers 1973; 43: 225–7
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zwaag H. Conveyance of information and viewing conditions of X-ray films. Diagn Imaging 1980; 49: 287–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alter A J, Kargas G A, Kargas S A, Cameron J R, McDermott J C. The influence of ambient and view-box light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph. Invest Radiol 1982; 17: 402–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxter B, Ravindra H, Normann R A. Changes in lesion detectability caused by light adaptation in retinal photoreceptors. Invest Radiol 1982; 17: 394–401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrild-Hansen B, Ratjen E. Investigations on the optimal illumination of viewing cabinets. Acta Radiol 1952; 38: 447–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewerin I, Andersen H E. Betragtningsvilkårenes betydning for informationsindholdet i intraorale røntgenbilleder. Tandlaegebladet 1982; 86: 428–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welander U, McDavid W D, Higgins N M, Morris C R. The effect of viewing conditions on the perceptibility of radiographic details. Oral Surg 1983; 56: 651–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mileman P A, Purdell-Lewis D J, Van der Weele LT, Leertouwer H L. Diagnostic variation caused by differences in viewbox illumination and visual ability. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1984; 13: 51–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold L V. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth [Thesis]. Universities of Utrecht and of Groningen, Utrecht and Groningen 1983; 272
   Google Scholar
• Leijon G. Betraktning av röntgenbilder. Sv Tandl Tidskr 1961; 53: 289–95
   Google Scholar
• Gröndahl HG, Hollender L, Johansson O, Zillén PÅ. Odontologisk röntgendiagnostik inom Praktikertjänst AB. Resultat av en enkätundersökning i oktober, 1977. Praktikertjänst AB, Stockholm 1977
   Google Scholar
• Klein A I, Campbell E, Yim P, Synenberg W. Dental radiographic diagnostic resolution with minimal exposure. Pediatr Dent 1985; 7: 47–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Belder M, Bollen R, Duville R. A new approach to the evaluation of radiographic systems. J Photogr Sci 1971; 19: 126–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espelid I. Framkallingsprosedyrenes betydning for røntgendiagnostikken. En undersøkelse av rutiner i tannlegepraksis og eksperimentell kariesdiag-nostikk ved ulik bildekvalitet [Thesis]. University of Bergen, Bergen 1981; 113
   Google Scholar
• Espelid I, Tveit A B, Haugejorden O, Riordan P J. Variation in radiographic interpretation and restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries among dentists in Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13: 26–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espelid I, Tveit A B. Radiographic diagnosis of mineral loss in approximal enamel. Caries Res 1984; 18: 141–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swets J A, Pickett R M. Evaluation of diagnostic systems. Methods from signal detection theory. Academic Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman D D, Alf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals-rating-method data. J Math Psychol 1969; 6: 487–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil B J, Weber E, Harrison D, Hellman S. Use of signal detection theory in examining the results of a contrast examination: a case study using the lymphangiogram. Radiology 1977; 123: 613–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen T W. Image perception in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980; 9: 37–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ravindra H, Normann R A, Baxter B. The effect of extraneous light on lesion detectability. A demonstration. Invest Radiol 1983; 18: 105–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Espelid I, Tveit A B. Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 31–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano T, Gröndahl HG, Gröndahl K, Webber R L. Effect of quantum noise on the detection of incipient proximal caries. Oral Surg 1982; 53: 212–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein I L, Mobley W H, Chellemi S J. The observer process in the visual interpretation of radiographs. J Dent Educ 1971; 35: 485–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendee W R, Barnes G T, Boyd D P, Crooks L, Dwyer S J, Kaufman L, Schneider R H, Spitzer V M, Wagner R F. New imaging technologies. Invest Radiol 1984; 19: 84–93, suppl
   Google Scholar