Comparison of three indices in evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome

References

• Eismann D. A method of evaluating efficiency of orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1974; 223–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gottlieb E L. Grading your orthodontic treatment results. J Clin Orthod 1975; IX: 156–61
   Google Scholar
• Richmond S, Shaw W C, O'Brien K D, Buchanan I B, Jones R, Stephens C D, et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richmond S, Shaw W C, Roberts C T, Andrew M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 180–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg K. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod 1979; 1: 55–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• So L L, Tang E L. A comparative study using the Occlusal Index and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 57–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger R M. Orthodontic treatment priority index. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto 1967
   Google Scholar
• Salzmann J A. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. Am J Orthod 1968; 54: 749–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summers C J. The Occlusal Index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971; 59: 552–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cons N C, Jenny J, Kohout F J. DAI: the dental aesthetic index. College of Dentistry, University of Iowa. 1986
   Google Scholar
• Pickering E A, Vig P. The Occlusal Index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 47–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elderton R J, Clark J D. Orthodontic treatment in general dental service assessed by the Occlusal Index. Br J Orthod 1983; 10: 178–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elderton R J, Clark J D. An investigation of treatment provided in the General Dental Service for patients with class II, division I malocclusions. Br J Orthod 1984; 11: 2–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang E L, Wei S HY. Assessing treatment effectiveness of removable and fixed orthodontic appliances with the Occlusal Index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 550–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook P H, Shaw W C. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 309–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond S, Roberts C T, Andrews M. Use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment pre- and post-appliance therapy. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 175–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swedish Medical Health Board. Kungl. Medicinalstyrelsens cirkulär den 13 december 1967 angående anvisningar för journalföringen inom folktvårdens tandregleringsvård. 1967, Stock-holm:MF nr 71
   Google Scholar
• Lundström A. Need for treatment in cases of malocclusion. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1977; 111–23
   Google Scholar
• Bergström K, Halling A. Orthodontic treatment outcome in three Swedish counties with different orthodontic resources. Swed Dent J 1996; 20: 51–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richmond S. Personal audit in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 113–54
   Google Scholar
• Kerr W JS, Buchanan I B, McColl J H. Use of the PAR Index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 351–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien K D, Shaw W C, Roberts C T. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the Hospital Orthodontic Service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 25–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 7–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richmond S, Andrew M, Roberts C T. The provision of orthodontic care in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: extraction pattern, treatment duration, appliance types and standards. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 345–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox N A. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (peer assessment rating) Index. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 290–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John W, Kerr S, Buchanan I B, McNair F I, McColl J H. Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 181–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom K, Halling A. Orthodontic care delivered by general practitioners and specialists in three Swedish counties with different orthodontic specialist resources. Swed Dent J 1996; 20: 35–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medin L, Bergström K, Filipsson R, Hannerz H, Jensen R. Need of orthodontic treatment. A suggestion to modify Indication Index according to Anders Lundstrom. Kieferorthopaed Mitt 1995; 9: 167–83
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan N J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences2nd ed., J D Anker. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmgren O. Studies on the need and demand for orthodontic treatment ‘thesis’. Swed Dent J 1980, Suppl 6
   Google Scholar
• Carlos J. Evaluation of different indices of malocclusion. Int Dent J 1970; 20: 606–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvinen S, Väätäjä P. Variability in assessment of need for orthodontic treatment when using certain treatment-need indices. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987; 15: 245–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattström V. Socialstyrelsens behandlingbehovsindex i orto-donti—en kritisk granskning. Tandlakartidningen 1987; 79: 704–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heikinheimo K. Need of orthodontic treatment and prevalence of craniomandibular dysfunction in Finnish children. ‘thesis’, University of Turku, Turku 1989
   Google Scholar