Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden

References

• MFR Medicinska Forskningsrådet. Potential biological consequences of alternatives to dental amalgam. Proceedings of a State-of-the-Art Conference. Swedish Medical Research Council, Stockholm 1992
   Google Scholar
• NIDR/NIH. Effects and side-effects of dental restorative materials. Proceedings of an NIH Technology Assessment Conference. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 1–144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dental amalgam: a scientific review and recommended public health service strategy for research, education and regulation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 1993
   Google Scholar
• Mjör L A. Orsaker till revision av fyllningar. Tandlakartidn 1979; 71: 552–6
   Google Scholar
• Mjör I A. Revision av fyllningar. Tandlakartidn 1980; 72: 375–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör I A. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981; 6: 49–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör L A. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 82–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Um C M. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 311–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendriks F HJ. Posterior composite restorations. thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen 1985
   Google Scholar
• Moffa J P. Comparative performance of amalgam and composite resin restorations and criteria for their use. Quality evaluation of dental restorations, K J Anusavice. Quintessence Publ. Co., Chicago 1989; 125–33
   Google Scholar
• Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of compositer restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 34–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Wilson N KF, Burke F JT. The relative cost of different restorations in the UK. Br Dent J 1996, In press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör L A. The long term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 60–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör I A. Problems and benefits associated with restorative materials. Side effects and cost-benefit analysis. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 7–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsten L. Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 503–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tveit A B, Gjerdet N R. Fluoride release from a fluoride-containing amalgam, a glass ionomer cement and a silicate cement in artificial saliva. J Oral Rehabil 1981; 8: 237–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss H. Effect of glass-ionomer cement in Vitro and in the oral environment. thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio 1993
   Google Scholar
• Hattab F N, El-Mowafy O M, Salem N S, El-Badrawy W AG. An in vivo study on the release of fluoride from glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 221–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch G, Hatiboric-Kofman G. Glass ionomer cements as a fluoride release system in vitro. Swed Dent J 1990; 14: 267–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Moor R. Evaluation of the long-term fluoride release of self-curing glass ionomer cements. thesis, University of Ghent, Ghent 1995
   Google Scholar
• Mjör I A. Glass ionomer restorations and secondary caries. A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 171–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör I A. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijken J, Persson S, Sjöström S. Presence of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli in saliva and on enamel, glass ionomer cement, and composite resin surfaces. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99: 13–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roulet J-F, Herder S. Ceramic inlays: an alternative for esthetic restorations in posterior teeth. J Fla Dent Assoc 1990; 2: 3c–6c
   Google Scholar
• Christensen R, Christensen G, Vogl S, Bagerter V. 2-year clinical comparison of 6 inlay systems. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 561, (Spec issue) (abstract 2360)
   Google Scholar
• Jokstad A, Mjör I A, Frazier K B. The teaching of all-ceramic restorations in Scandinavian dental schools: a survey. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 200–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toreskog S, Rehnberg P. Vävnadsbevarande estetisk tand-behandling. En handbok i visioner. Soh: LIC Förlag, 1993. Rehnberg Förlag, Stockholm 1995
   Google Scholar
• Roulet J-F, Kanzler R. Longevity and margin quality of adhesively luted sintered ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 147, (Spec issue) (abstract 1037)
   Google Scholar