The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice

References

• Mjör I A. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 53–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A. Order till revision av fyllningar. Tandlakartidn 1979; 71: 552–6
   Google Scholar
• Mjör I A. Revision av fyllningar. Tandlakartidn 1980; 72: 375–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör I A. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981; 6: 49–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klausner L H, Charbeneau G T. Amalgam restorations: a cross-sectional survey of placement and replacement. J Michigan Dent Assoc 1985; 67: 249–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klausner L H, Green T G, Charbeneau G T. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations: a challenge for the profession. Oper Dent 1987; 12: 105–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör I A. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 297–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör I A. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 70–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 82–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjör I A, Um C M. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 311–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pink F E, Minden N J, Simmonds S. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general dental practice settings. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 127–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 228–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 34–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey H J, Phillips R W. A clinical study of amalgam failures. J Dent Res 1949; 28: 439–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knibbs P J. Glass ionomer cement: 10 years of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 1988; 15: 103–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch G, Hatibovic-Kofman G. Glass ionomer cements as a fluoride release system in vivo. Swed Dent J 1990; 14: 267–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hattab F N, El-Mowafy O M, Salem N S, El-Badrawy W AG. An in vivo study on the release of fluoride from glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 221–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör L A. Glass ionomer restorations and secondary caries. A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 171–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör L A. Direct posterior filling materials. State-of-the-art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding, G Vanherle, M Derange, G Willems. van der Poorten, Leuven 1993; 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Mjör I A. The long term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 60–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letzel H, van t'Hof M A, Vrijhoef M MA, Marshall G W, Marshall S, Failure J. survival, and reasons for replacement of amalgam restorations. Quality evaluation of dental restorations, K J Anusavice. Quintessence Publ. Co., Chicago 1989; 83–92
   Google Scholar
• Merrett M CW, Elderton R J. An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and secondary caries. Br Dent J 1984; 12: 169–72
   Google Scholar
• Rytömaa I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Lind K. Clinical assessment of amalgam fillings. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1984; 157: 1128–33
   Google Scholar
• Söderholm L-J, Antonson D E, Fischlschweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent canes. Quality evaluation of dental restorations, K J Anusavice. Quintessence Publ. Co., Chicago 1989; 93–108
   Google Scholar
• Espelid I, Tveit A B. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 359–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör L A, Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent 1996, In press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyas M J. Cario-static effect of glass-ionomer cement. Autr Dent J 1991; 36: 236–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad A, Mjör L A. Replacement reasons and service time of class II amalgam restorations in relation to cavity design. Acta Odontol Scand 1991; 49: 109–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd M A. Amalgam replacement: are decisions based on fact or tradition?. Quality evaluation of dental restorations, K J Anusavice. Quintessence Publ. Co., Chicago 1989; 73–80
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton J C, Moffa J P, Ellison J A, Jenkins W A. Marginal fracture not a predictor of longevity for two dental amalgam alloys: a ten-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 200–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn J W, Norman R D, Gale E N. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 857–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smales R J, Webster D A, Leppard P I. Survival predictions of four types of dental restorative materials. J Dent 1991; 19: 278–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smales R J, Hawthorne W S. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 126–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanford J W. Future of materials and materials research. Adv Dent Res 1988; 2: 187–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyas M J. Dental materials science—the maintenance of standards. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 18: 105–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar