References
- Townshend B, Cotter N, van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 106–15
- Moore BC. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 243–54
- Nelson DA, Van Tasell DJ, Schroder AC, Soli S. Electrode ranking of “place pitch“ and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 1987–99
- Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear Res 2006; 214: 17–27
- Sprögel, J, Frohne-Büchner, C, Büchner, A, Brendel, M, Battmer, RD, Lenarz, Th. Exploring the intra-cochlear current spread using electrical field imaging. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium and Workshops on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implants, Hannover, Germany, 2005.
- Staller S, Menapace C, Domico E, Mills D, Dowell RC, Geers A, et al. Speech perception abilities of adult and pediatric Nucleus implant recipients using the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) coding strategy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117(3 Pt1): 236–42
- Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 629–36
- Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 1538–47
- Stickney GS, Loizou PC, Mishra LN, Assmann PF, Shannon RV, Opie JM. Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions. Hear Res 2006; 211: 33–45
- Mens LH, Berenstein CK. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 957–64
- Loizou PC, Stickney G, Mishra L, Assmann P. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 12–19
- Nogueira W, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Edler B. A psychoacoustic “NofM”-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005; 2005: 3044–59
- Boex C, de Balthasar C, Kos MI, Pelizzone M. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114(4 Pt 1): 2049–57
- Kwon BJ, van den Honert C. Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120: 1–6
- McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 155–62
- Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L. Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 623–6
- Vanpoucke, F, Boermans, PP, Braire, J, Boyle, P, Frijns, J. Loudness and perceptual dimensions of current steered electrodes: simultaneous versus sequential. Poster presentation at the 9th International Conference on Cochlear Implants, Vienna, Austria, June 14–17, 2006.
- Balthasar C, Boex C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M. Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res 2003; 182: 77–87
- Buechner A, Brendel M, Krueger B, Frohne-Buechner C, Nogueira W, Edler B, et al. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 203–7
- Brendel M, Buechner A, Krueger B, Frohne-Buechner C, Lenarz T. Evaluation of the Harmony Soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 199–202