Implementation of perceptual channels in children implanted with a HiRes 90K device

References

• Xu L, Pfingst BE. Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses. Hear Res 2008; 242: 132–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman-Phillips S, Murad C. Programming features of the CLARION multi-strategy cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1999; 177: 17–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frijns JH, Klop WM, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with a high-rate stimulation of the Clarion CII implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 138–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spar A, Dorman M. Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 260–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner A, Frohne-Buechner C, Gaertner L, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 407–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution Bionic Ear: using appropriate outcome measures to access speech recognition abilities. Otol Neurootol 2004; 9: 214–23
   Google Scholar
• Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA, Gantz BJ. Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 115: 425–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipo R, Mancini P, Ballantyne D, Bosco E, D'Elia C. Short-term study of the effect of speech coding strategy on the auditory performance of pre- and post-lingually deafened adults implanted with the Clarion CII. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 368–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco E, D'Agosta L, Mancini P, Traisci G, D'Elia C, Filipo R. Speech perception results in children implanted with Clarion devices: Hi-Resolution and Standard resolution modes. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 125: 148–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurootol 2007; 28: 629–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, DB, Downing, M, Osberger, MJ, Litvak, L. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear 2007;28(2), Suppl):38S–41S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advanced Bionics Corporation. Increasing spectral channels through current steering in HiResolution Bionic Ear users. Advanced Bionics Corporation: available at http://www.bionicear.com (accessed July 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Advanced Bionics Corporation. Results of the European multi-centre study on the determination of perceptual channels. White paper available at: http://pro.bionicear.eu/spip.php?article298 (accessed January 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Buechner A, Brendel M, Krüeger B, Frohne-Büchner C, Nogueira W, Edler B, et al. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies. Otol Neurootol 2008; 29: 203–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, P, Bosco, E, D'Agosta, L, Traisci, G, D'Elia, E, Filipo, R. HiRes 120 in children using the HiRes 90K device: preliminary report. Auditory Research Bulletin, 2007, biennial edition. Valencia, CA: Advanced Bionics. Available at: http://www.bionicear.com (accessed September 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Govaerts PJ, Daemers K, Yperman M, De Beukelaer C, De Saegher G, De Ceulaer G. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A§E®): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International 2006; 7: 97–106
   Google Scholar
• Daemers K, Yperman M, De Beukelaer C, De Saegher G, De Ceulaer G, Govaerts PJ. Normative data of the A§E® discrimination and identification tests in preverbal children. Cochlear Implants International 2006; 7: 107–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowan RS, Brown C, Whitford LA, Galvin KL, Sarant JZ, Barker EJ, et al. Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 318–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psarros, CE, Plant, KL, Lee, K, Decker, JA, Whitford, LA, Cowan, RS. Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception and speech production outcomes. Ear Hear 2002;23(1), Suppl, 18S–27S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique M, Huarte A, Morera C, Caballé L, Ramos A, Castillo C, et al. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69: 1667–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand J. Perceptual organization of speech sounds in infants. J Speech Hear Res 1983; 26: 268–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar