Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Volume 130, 2010 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
223
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AUDIOLOGY

Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: Effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant

Filippo Di Lella Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Middle Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected]
, MD,
Andrea Bacciu Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Middle Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
,
Enrico Pasanisi Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Middle Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
,
Vincenzo Vincenti Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Middle Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
,
Maurizio Guida Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Middle Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
&
Salvatore Bacciu Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Middle Ear Microsurgery and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Pages 102-107 | Received 16 Oct 2008, Published online: 18 Jan 2010

References

  • Balkany T, Hodges A, Menapace C, Hazard L, Driscoll C, Gantz B, et al. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136: 757–62
  • Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA, Demorest ME. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 463–76
  • Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, et al. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 381–93
  • Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Ormitti F, Di Lella F, Guida M, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with cerebral palsy. A preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 717–21
  • Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: Duration effects. Hear Res 2008; 244: 7–14
  • Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: Rate effects. Hear Res 2008; 244: 15–24
  • Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 608–24
  • Skinner MW, Holden LK, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Psarros C, Holden TA. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 207–23
  • Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Cruz RJ. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 169–84
  • Fu QJ. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration. Hear Res 2005; 202: 55–62
  • Weber BP, Lai WK, Dillier N, von Wallenberg EL, Killian MJ, Pesch J, et al. Performance and preference for ACE stimulation rates obtained with nucleus RP 8 and freedom system. Ear Hear 2007; 28(2 Suppl)46S–48S
  • Buchner A, Frohne-Buchner C, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Two years of experience using stimulation rates between 800 and 5000 pps with the Clarion CII implant. Elsevier International Congress Series 2004; 1273: 48–51
  • Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson D, Zerbi M. Temporal representation with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997; 18: S27–S29
  • Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Finley CC, Abbas PJ. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear Res 1999; 127: 108–18
  • Moore BCJ. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 243–54

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.