The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: Stimulation rates up to 5000 pps

References

• Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Zerbi M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993; 30: 110–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou P. Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1998; 15: 101–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou PC, Stickney G, Mishra L, Assmann P. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 12–19]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buechner A, Frohne-Buechner C, Gaertner L, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 407–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battmer, RD, Buechner, A, Boyle, P, Frohne-Buechner, C, Lenarz, T. High Resolution Mode of the Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant System: clinical investigation of stimulation rates up to 3000 pps. Cochlear Implants Int submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Buechner A, Frohne-Buechner C, Stoever T, Gaertner L, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Comparison of a paired or sequential stimulation paradigm with advanced bionics' high-resolution mode. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 941–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segel, P, Voelkel, A, Faltys, M, Hartley, L, Kessler, D. The systematic evaluation of parameters in the fitting of High Resolution strategies in the Clarion Bionic Ear System. Presented at the Conference on Implantable Auditory Protheses, Asilomar, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, L, Boyle, P. Early results on high resolution (High Resolution Mode) programming with the Soundwave fitting software. Presented at the VII International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Related Audiological Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Javel E, Viemeister NF. Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 908–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res 2000; 140: 45–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, BS, Finley, CC, Lawson, DT, Zerbi, M. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18(6 Suppl)S30–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubinstein, JT, Hong, R. Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Suppl2003;191:14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Balkany, T, Hodges, A, Menapace, C, Hazard, L, Driscoll, C, Gantz, B, , et al. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:757–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, BP, Lai, WK, Dillier, N, von Wallenberg, EL, Killian, MJ, Pesch, J, , et al. Performance and preference for ACE stimulation rates obtained with nucleus RP 8 and freedom system. Ear Hear 2007;28(2 Suppl):46S–48S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 208–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns JH, Klop WM, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 138–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou P, Poroy O, Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 108: 790–802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, v. Ilberg C, Hubner-Egner J, Rupprecht V, Knecht R. Optimized speech understanding with the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy in patients with cochlear implants: effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000; 109: 1009–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendel, M, Büchner, A, Frohne-Büchner, C, Gärtner, L, Lenarz, T. Evaluation der Möglichkeit zur Bestimmung der optimalen Stimulationsrate über die Lautheit im HiRes-System. Proceedings of the 8. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Göttingen, 2005, ISBN 3-9809869-4-2.
   Google Scholar
• Büchner, A, Frohne-Büchner, C, Brendel, M, Pilsak, S, Battmer, RD, Lenarz, T. Recording the neural response while stimulating with a high rate burst. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium and Workshops on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implants, Hannover, 1–4, June, 2005.
   Google Scholar