Pitch Discrimination and Age

References

• Zwaardemaker H. Der Verlust an hohen Tonen mit zunehmendem Alter. Arch. f. Ohrcnheilk. 1891; 32: 53–56, (Cited by E. G. Wever: Theory of Hearing. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York,1949.)
   Google Scholar
• Bunch C. C, Raiford T. S. Race and sex variations in auditory acuity. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1931; 13: 423–434
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Montgomery, Gardner. Results of the world's fair hearing tests. Bell Sys. Tcchn. J. 1940; 19: 533–562
   Google Scholar
• J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1940; 12: 291–301
   Google Scholar
• Webster J. C, Himes H. W., Lichtenstein M. San Diego County fair hearing survey. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1950; 22: 473–483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober F. W. Über die Abhängigkeit der oberen Hörgrenze vom Lebensalter. Acustica 1952; 4(Suppl.)219–224
   Google Scholar
• Crowe S. I., Guild S. R., Polvogt L. M. Observations of the pathology of high-tone deafness. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1934; 54: 315–329
   Google Scholar
• von Fieandt H., Saxén A. Pathologie und Klinik der Altersschwerhörigkeit. Acta oto-laryng. 1937; Suppl. XXIII
   Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F., Woellner R. C. An experimental and clinical study of deafness from lesions of the cochlear nerve. J. Laryng. Otol. 1955; 69: 75–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F. Presbyacusis. Laryngoscope 1955; 65: 402–419
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pestalozza G., Shore I. Clinical evaluation of presbycusis on the basis of different tests of auditory function. Laryngoscope 1955; 65: 1136–1163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meurman O. H. Studies on the difference limen of intensity and frequency in presbyacusis. Proceedings of the First International Congress of Audiology, Leiden. 1953; 5-6 VI: 59–63
   Google Scholar
• Meurman O. H. The difference limen of frequency in tests of auditory function. Acta oto-laryng. 1954; Suppl. 118: 144–155
   Google Scholar
• Schubert K. Über die Prüfung des Tonhöhenunterscheidungsvermögens. Arch. Ohrenusw. Heilk. 1951; 159: 339–353
   Google Scholar
• Fournier J. E. Determination of the difference limen of pitch. Paper presented at the. Fifth International Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngo-Broncho-Oesophagology. Amsterdam 1953
   Google Scholar
• Azzi A. The sensibility of the human ear to frequency modulation. Proceedings of the First International Congress of Audiology, Leiden. 1953; 5-6 VI
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Kaiser W. Der Verlauf der Modulationsschwellen in der Hörfläche. Acustica 1952; 4(Suppl.)239–246
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Die Veränderung der Modulationsschwellen durch verdeckende Töne und Geräusche. Acustica 1953; 2(Suppl.)274–278
   Google Scholar
• Shower E. G., Biddulph R. Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1931; 3: 275–287
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Myers C. K. Recruitment, pitch tests, and speech-tone hearing discrepancies. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1955; 62: 66–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttler R. A., Albrite J. P. The pitch-discriminative function of the pathological ear. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1956; 63: 411–418
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. Pitch discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1952; 24: 750–755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König E. Effect of time on pitch discrimination thresholds under several psychophysical procedures: comparison with intensity discrimination thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1957; 29: 606–612
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Gässier G. Die Eignung des dynamischen Kopfhörers zur Untersuchung frequenzmodulierter Töne. Acustica 1952; Suppl. 3: 134–139
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Spindler W. Über den Einfluss nichtlinearer Verzerrungen auf die Horbarkeit des Frequenzvibrators. Acustica 1953; Suppl. 1: 100–104
   Google Scholar
• Bachem A. Chroma fixation at the ends of the musical frequency scale. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1948; 20: 704–705
   Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. Subjective musical pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1954; 26: 369–380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Munson W. A. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1933; 5: 82–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblith W. A., Stevens K. N. On the DL for frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1953; 25: 980–985
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I. Comfortable listening levels for pure tones in quiet and noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1952; 24: 158–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorge I. Aging and intelligence. J. Chron. Dis. 1956; 4: 131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansing A. F. Cowdry's Problems of Aging,3rd ed. William & Wilkins, Baltimore 1952, Other papers cited in reference 9.
   Google Scholar
• Reger S. N. Difference in loudness response of the normal and hard hearing ear at intensity levels slightly above the threshold. Ann. Otol, Rhinol., Laryngol 1936; 5: 1029
   Google Scholar
• Lu Uscher E., Zwislocki J. Eine einfache Methode zur monauralen Bestimmung des Lautstarkeausgleiches. Arch. Ohr- usw. Heilk. 1949; 155: 323–334
   Google Scholar
• Quiggle R. R., Glorig A., Delk J. H., Summerfield A. B. Predicting hearing loss for speech from pure tone audiograms. Laryngoscope 1957; 67: 1–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler E. P. The percentage of capacity to hear speech and related disabilities. Laryngoscope 1947; 57: 103–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. A method of calculating hearing loss for speech from an audiogram. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1950; 22: 1–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeth J. H. A Study of Phonemic Regression in Relation to Hearing Loss. Doctoral dissertation. Northwestern Univ. XVI 1949, Cited in reference 10.
   Google Scholar