References
- Hough J, McGee M, Dormer K J, et al. The cochlear implant. Oklahoma group experience to date. Laryngoscope 1982; 92: 863–72
- Thielemeir M A, Brimacombe J A, Eisenberg L S. Audiological results with the cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91, Suppl 91: 27–34
- Miyamoto R T, Myres W A, Wagner M, Punch J L. Vibrotactile devices as sensory aids for the deaf. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 97: 57–63
- Plant G, Spens K E. An experienced user of tactile information as a supplement to lipreading. An evaluative study. KTH Speech Transmission Laboratory: Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1986; 1: 87–110
- Reed C M, Durchland N I, Braida L D. Research on tactile communication of speech: A review. ASHA Monographs 1982; 20: 1–23
- De Filippo C L. Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 211–27
- Kirman J H. Tactile communication of speech: a review and an analysis. Psychol Bull 1973; 80: 54–74
- Risberg A, Agelfors E. An audiological test battery for speech communication diagnosis in severe hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1983; Suppl 18: 5–10
- Rihkanen H. Rehabilitation assessment of postlingually deaf adults using single-channel intra-cochlear implants or vibrotactile aids. Thesis. University of Helsinki. 1988; 144
- Erber N P, Alencewich C M. Audiological evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Dis 1976; 41: 256–67
- De Filippo C L, Scott B L. A method for training and evaluation of the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1186–92
- Blarney P J, Dowell R C, Brown A M, Clark G M. Clinical results with a hearing aid and a single-channel vibrotactile device for profoundly deaf adults. Br J Audiol 1985; 19: 203–10
- Skinner M W, Binzer S M, Fredrickson J M, et al. Comparison of the benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for the post-lingually deaf adults. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1092–9