597
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MIDDLE EAR

Titanium versus non-titanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty: A meta-analysis

, , &
Pages 708-715 | Received 02 Dec 2010, Accepted 13 Jan 2011, Published online: 15 Apr 2011

References

  • Coffey CS, Lee FS, Lambert PR. Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1650–8.
  • Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:492–8.
  • Zenner HP, Stegmaier A, Lehner R, Baumann I, Zimmermann I. Open Tübingen titanium prostheses for ossiculoplasty: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:582–9.
  • Neff BA, Rizer FM, Schuring AG, Lippy WH. Tympano-ossiculoplasty utilizing the Spiggle and Theis titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1525–9.
  • Gardner EK, Jackson CG, Kaylie DM. Results with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses. Laryngoscope 2004;114:65–70.
  • Downs BW, Pearson JM, Zdanski CJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC. Revision ossicular reconstruction with titanium Kurz prosthesis. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1335–7.
  • Goldenburg RA, Emment JR. Current use of implants in middle ear surgery. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:45–52.
  • Javia LR, Ruckenstein MJ. Ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2006;39:1177–89.
  • Stupp CH, Dalchow C, Grün D, Stupp HF, Wustrow J. [Three years of experience with titanium implants in the middle ear.] Laryngorhinootologie 1999;78:299–303 (in German).
  • Krueger WW, Feghali JG, Shelton C, Green JD, Beatty CW, Wilson DF, Preliminary ossiculoplasty results using the Kurz titanium prostheses. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:836–9.
  • Hillman TA, Shelton C. Ossicular chain reconstruction: titanium versus plastipore. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1731–5.
  • Redaelli de Zinis LO. Titanium vs hydroxyapatite ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:1283–7.
  • Fong JC, Michael P, Raut V. Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:554–8.
  • Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashivili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Oto Neurotol 2009;30:332–8.
  • Yung M, Smith P. Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses – a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:752–8.
  • Ceccato SB, Maunsell R, Morata GC, Portmann D. Comparative results of type II ossiculoplasty: incus transposition versus titanium PORP (Kurz). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2005;126:175–9.
  • Woods O, Fata FE, Saliba I. Ossicular reconstruction: incus versus universal titanium prosthesis. Auris Nasus Laryx 2009;36:387–92.
  • Maassen MM, Zenner HP. Tympanoplasty type II with ionomeric cement and titanium-gold-angle prostheses. Am J Otol 1998;19:693–9.
  • Yung MW, Brewis C. A comparison of the user-friendliness of hydroxyapatite and titanium ossicular prostheses. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:97–102.
  • Kriskovich M, Shelton C. 2000. Surgical treatment of chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma. In: Canalis RF, Lambert RR, editors. The ear. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Williams. p 465–77.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.