High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography: a potential tool to improve atraumatic electrode design and position

References

• Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:1083–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordin A, Papsin B, James A, Gordon K. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:908–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wermeskerken GK, van Olphen AF, Graamans K. Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:1527–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipo R, Mancini P, Panebianco V, Viccaro M, Covelli E, Vergari V, Assessment of intracochlear electrode position and correlation with behavioural thresholds in CII and 90K cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:291–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K, Kuhweide R, Offeciers E, Casselman JW. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus−22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:332–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist BM, Frijns JH, Geleijns J, van Buchem MA. Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. AJNR 2005;26:424–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting BR, Bae KT, Skinner MW. Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs. Radiology 2001;221:543–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly M, Chan H, Nithiananthan S, Qui J, Barker E, Bachar G, Clinical implementation of intraoperative cone-beam CT in head and neck surgery. Proc SPIE 2011;7964:796426.
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty MA, Siewerdsen JH, Chan Y, Daly MJ, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA, Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of temporal bone surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:801–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker E, Trimble K, Chan H, Ramsden J, Nithiananthan S, James A, Intraoperative use of cone-beam computed tomography in a cadaveric ossified cochlea model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:697–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Das P, Daly M, Chan H, Irish J, James A. Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography in determining the position of ossicular prostheses: a cadaveric model. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:1358–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Burch S, Bisland SK, Bogaards A, Wilson BC, Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys 2005;32:241–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly MJ, Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA, Irish JC. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Med Phys 2006;33:3767–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nauer CB, Rieke A, Zubler C, Candreia C, Arnold A, Senn P. Low-dose temporal bone CT in infants and young children: effective dose and image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1375–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James AL, Papsin BC. Cochlear implant surgery at 12 months of age or younger. Laryngoscope 2004;114:2191–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein JT. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12:444–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lane JI, Witte RJ, Driscoll CL, Shallop JK, Beatty CW, Primak AN. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:658–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman TA, Noble JH, Wright CG, Wanna GB, Dawant B, Labadie RF. Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography. Laryngoscope 2010;120:2277–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Yoffie RL, Kalender WA. Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. Am J Otol 1994;15:644–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postnov A, Zarowski A, De Clerck N, Vanpoucke F, Offeciers FE, Van Dyck D, High resolution micro-CT scanning as an innovative tool for evaluation of the surgical positioning of cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:467–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll CL, Carlson ML, Fama AF, Lane JI. Evaluation of the hybrid-L24 electrode using microcomputed tomography. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1508–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, Zanella F, Hochmuth A, Schumacher M, Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:34–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar