424
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Objective and subjective evaluations of the Nurotron Venus cochlear implant system via animal experiments and clinical trials

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 68-77 | Received 07 May 2015, Accepted 05 Aug 2015, Published online: 18 Sep 2015

References

  • Frijns JH, Klop WM, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:138–42.
  • Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear 2006;27:208–17.
  • Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993;66:108–20.
  • Zeng FG, Rebscher SJ, Fu QJ, Chen H, Sun X, Yin L, et al. Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system. Hear Res 2015;322:188–99.
  • Opie JM, Allum JH, Probst R. Evaluation of electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold measured through three different cochlear implant systems. Am J Otol 1997;18:S107–8.
  • Fu QJ, Zhu M, Wang X. Development and validation of the Mandarin speech perception test. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;129:EL267–73.
  • Chinese Ministry of Health. The clinical technical specification of cochlear implants. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;42:323
  • Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1729–35.
  • James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, Burdo S, Deggouj N, Deguine O, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:481–91.
  • Garcia-Ibanez L, Macias AR, Morera C, Rodriguez MM, Szyfter W, Skarszynski H, et al. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:651–64.
  • Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:106–15.
  • Nelson DA, Van Tasell DJ, Schroder AC, Soli S, Levine S. Electrode ranking of “place pitch” and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;98:1987–99.
  • Ping LC, Yuan M, Tang GF, Feng HH. Place-pitch perception in electrical hearing with post-lingual deafened cochlear implant users. Acta Acustica 2012;37:204–8.
  • van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986;21:109–26.
  • Tam YC, Graves MJ, Black RT, Kenway B, Donnelly N, Gray RF, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with cochlear implants and auditory brain stem implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11(Suppl 2):48–51.
  • Kretzmer EA, Meltzer NE, Haenggeli CA, Ryugo DK. An animal model for cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:499–508.
  • Battmer RD, Laszig R, Lehnhardt E. Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1990;11:370–4.
  • Lorens A, Walkowiak A, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H, Anderson I. ESRT and MCL correlations in experienced paediatric cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2004;5:28–37.
  • Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, Lambert PR, Dolan-Ash S, Schloffman JJ. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:255–61.
  • Fraysse B, Macias AR, Sterkers O, Burdo S, Ramsden R, Deguine O, et al. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:624–33.
  • Wu JL, Yang HM. Speech perception of Mandarin Chinese speaking young children after cochlear implant use: effect of age at implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:247–53.
  • Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, Arndt PL, Cosgriff A, Ebinger K. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002;23:41S–8S.
  • Kong YY, Zeng FG. Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:2830–40.
  • Xu L, Tsai Y, Pfingst BE. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:247–58.
  • Fu QJ, Zeng FG, Shannon RV, Soli SD. Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:505–10.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.