References
- Dowell R C., Whitford L A., Seligman P M., Franz B K‐H, Clark G M. Preliminary results with a miniature speech processor for the 22‐electrode Melbourne/Cochlear hearing prosthesis. Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, T Sacristan, J J. Alvaraz‐Vincent, J Bartual, F Antoli‐Candela, et al. Kugler and Ghedini, Amsterdam 1990; 1167–73
- Shepherd R K., Clark G M., Black R C. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Acta Otolar‐yngol (Stockh) 1983, Suppl 399: 19–31
- McAnally K I., Clark G M., Syka J. Hair cell mediated responses of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the cat. Hear Res 1993; 67: 55–68
- Ni D, Shepherd R K., Seldon H L., Xu S, Clark G M., Millard R E. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Normal hearing kittens. Hear Res 1992; 62: 63–81
- Michelson R P., Merzenich M M., Schindler R A., Schlindler D N. Present status and future development of the cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol 1975; 84: 494–8
- Black R C., Clark G M., Patrick J F. Current distribution measurements within the human cochlea. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1981; 28: 721–5
- van den Honert C, Stypulkowski P H. Single fibre mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear Res 1987; 29: 195–206
- Duckert L G., Miller J M. Acute morphological changes in guinea pig following electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91: 33–40
- Miller J M., Duckert L G., Malone M A., Pfingst B E. Cochlear prostheses: Stimulation‐induced damage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 599–609
- Dallos P, Cheatham M A. Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 591–7
- Brownell W E., Bader C R., Bertrand D, de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 1985; 227: 194–6
- Millard R E., McAnally K I., Clark G M. A gated differential amplifier for recording physiological responses to electrical stimulation. J Neurosci Meth 1992; 44: 81–4
- Greenwood D D. A cochlear frequency‐position function for several species—29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2592–605
- Desmedt J E. Physiological studies of the efferent recurrent auditory system. Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. 5. Auditory system. Part 2, W D. Keidel, W Neff. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin 1975; 219–46
- Norris C H., Guth P S., Daigneault E A. The site at which peripheral auditory adaptation occurs. Brain Res 1977; 123: 176–9
- Parkins C W. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibres to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res 1989; 41: 137–68
- Moxon E C. Neural and mechanical responses to electrical stimulation of the cat's inner ear. Doctoral dissertation, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 1971
- van den Honert C, Stypulkowski P H. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fibre recordings. Hear Res 1984; 14: 225–43
- Kiang N Y‐S, Watanabe T, Thomas E C., Clark L F. Discharge patterns of single fibres in the cat's auditory nerve. M.I.T. Research monograph 35, 1965
- Plomp R. Pitch, timbre and hearing theory. Int Audio1 1968; 7: 322–44
- Flanagan J L., Guttman N. On the pitch of periodic pulses. J Acoust Soc Am 1960; 32: 1308–19
- Arapova A, Gersuni G. On the frequency of alternating current and the pitch of the tone during electrical stimulation on the auditory apparatus. Tech Phys U.S.S.R. 1938; 5: 447–62
- Patuzzi R, Robertson D. Tuning in the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 1988; 68: 1009–82
- Patuzzi R B., Yates G K., Johnstone B M. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 1989; 42: 47–72