References
- Dowell R C, Martin L FA, Clark G M, Brown A M. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94: 244–50
- Dowell R C, Mecklenburg D J, Clark G M. Speech recognition results for 40 multichannel cochlear implant patients in the USA and Australia. Arch Otolaryngol 1986; 112: 1054–9
- Blamey P J, Dowell R C, Brown A M, Clark G M, Selig-Man P M. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. J Acoust SOC Am 1987; 82: 48–57
- Dowell R C, Seligman P M, Blamey P J, Clark G M. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Otolar-yngol (Stockh) 1987; 104: 439–46
- Dowell R C, Whitford L A, Seligman P M, Franz B KH, Clark G M (1990) Preliminary results with a Miniature Speech Processor for the 22-electrode Melbourne/Cochlear hearing prosthesis. Otorhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Proceedings of the XIV World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, MadridSpain, September 10-15, 1989., T Sacristan. Kugler and Ghedini, Amsterdam, 1167–73
- Skinner M W, Holden L K, Holden T A, et al. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode coch-lear implant. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 3–22
- von Wallenberg E L, Battmer R D. Comparative speech recognition results in eight subjects using two different coding strategies with the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 371–80
- McDermott H J, McKay C M, Vandali A E. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J Acoust SOC Am 1992; 91(6)367–71
- McKay C M, McDermott H J, Vandali A E, Clark G M. A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implan-tees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (MULTIPEAK) Procesor. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1992; 112: 752–61
- McKay C M, McDermott H J. Perceptual performance of Cochlear Implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP). Ear Hear 1993; 14: 350–67
- Whitford L A, Seligman P M, Blamey P J, McDermott H J, Patrick J F. Comparison of current speech coding strategies. Cochlear Implants: New Perspectives. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, B Fraysse, O Deguine. Karger, Basel 1993; 48: 85–90
- Dowell R C, Martin L FA, Tong Y C, Clark G M, Seligman P M, Patrick J F. A 12 consonant confusion study on a multiple channel cochlear implant patient. J Speech Hear Res 1982; 25: 509–16
- Lehiste I, Peterson G E. Linguistic considerations in the study of speech intelligibility. J Acoust SOC Am 1959; 31: 280–6
- Peterson G E, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disorders 1962; 27: 62–70
- Boothroyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T. A sentence of speech perception: reliability, set equivalence, and short term learning. Internal report RCI 10. City University of New York, New York 1985
- Magner M E. A speech intelligibility test for deaf children. Clarke School for the Deaf. Northampton, MA 1972
- Owens E, Kessler D K, Raggio M W, Schubert E D. Analysis and revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) Battery. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 280–90
- Dobson A J. Binary variables and logistic regression. Introduction to Statistical Modelling. Chapman and Hall, London 1983; 74–90