20
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Nijdam Voice Prosthesis: A Self-retaining Valveless Voice Prosthesis for Vocal Rehabilitation after Total Laryngectomy

, , &
Pages 913-917 | Received 25 Sep 1995, Accepted 15 Jan 1996, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Staffieri M. Funktionelle total Laryngectomie (chirur-gische Technik, Indicationen und Resultate einen eiger Technik zur Glottisplastiek tnit wiederherstellung der Stimme). Monatschr Ohrenheilkd 1973; 107: 77–89
  • Amatsu M. A new one-stage surgical technique for postlaryngectomy speech. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1978; 220: 149–52
  • Blom E D, Singer MI. Surgical-prosthetic approaches for postlaryngectomy voice restoration. Laryngectomee rehabilitation., R L Keith, FL Darly. College-Hill Press, Houston, TX 1979; 251–76
  • Nijdam H F, Annyas A A, Schutte H K, Leever H. A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 237: 27–33
  • Hilgers F JM, Schouwenburg PF. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 1202–7
  • Smith BE. Aerodynamic characteristics of Blom-Singer low-pressure voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol 1986; 112: 50–2
  • Zijlstra R J, Mahieu H F, van Lith-Bijl J T, Schutte HK. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Gronin-gen button. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 657–61
  • Hilgers F JM, Cornelissen M W, Balm A JM. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prothesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 250: 375–8
  • Singer M I, Blom E D, Hamaker RC. Further experience with voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 498–502
  • Manni J J, van den Broek P, De Groot M AH, et al. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Groningen prosthesis. J Otolaryngol 1984; 13: 333–6
  • Hilgers F JM, Balm A JM. Long term results of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy with the low-resistance, indwelling Provox voice prosthesis system. Clin Otolaryngol 1993; 18: 517–23
  • Hirsch S M, Schuller DE. Vocal restorative surgery: Why wait?. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: 975–7
  • Kao W W, Mohr R M, Kimmel C A, Getch C, Silverman C. The outcome and techniques of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol 1994; 120: 301–7
  • Singer M I, Blom E D, Hamaker RC. Pharyngeal plexus neurectomy for laryngeal speech rehabilitation. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: 50–3
  • Singer M I, Blom ED. Selective myotomy for voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107: 670–3
  • Mahieu H F, Annyas A A, Schutte H K, van der Jagt EJ. Pharyngo-esophageal myotomy for vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomees. Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 451–7
  • Manni J J, van den Broek P. Surgical and prosthesis-related complications using the Groningen button voice prosthesis. Clin Otolaryngol 1990; 15: 515–23
  • Mathieson C M, Stam H J, Scott JP. Psychosocial adjustment after laryngectomy: a review of the literature. J Otolaryngol 1990; 19: 331–5
  • Mahieu HF. Voice and speech rehabilitation following laryngectomy. PhD thesis, Groningen University, Groningenthe Netherlands 1988
  • Annyas A A, Nijdam H F, Escajadillo J R, Mahieu H F, Leever H. Groningen prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 1984; 9: 51–4
  • Blom ED. Blom-Singer indwelling low pressure tracheoesophageal prosthesis and gel cap insertion system. Book of Abstracts, Seventh Annual Pacific Voice Conference, October 14-16. San Francisco, California 1994; 31–2
  • Mahieu H F, van Saene H KF, Rosingh H J, Schutte HK. Candida vegetations on silicone voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol 1986; 112: 321–5
  • Remade M JM, Declaye X JM. Gax-collagen injection to correct an enlarged tracheo-esophageal fistula for a vocal prosthesis. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1350–2
  • Nieboer G LJ, Schutte HK. The Groningen button: results of in vivo measurements. Rev Laryngol 1987; 108: 121–2
  • van Lith-Bijl JT, Mahieu H F, Patel P, Zijlstra RJ. Clinical experience with the low-resistance Groningen button. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1992; 249: 354–7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.