References
- Greene T. The Kraepelinian dichotomy: the twin pillars crumbling? Hist Psychiatry 2007; 18:361–379.
- Berrios GE, Luque RM, Villagrán JM. Schizophrenia: a conceptual history. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 2003; 3:111–140.
- Craddock N, Owen MJ. The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186:364–366.
- Ghaemi SN, Baldessarini RJ. The manic-depressive spectrum and mood stabilization: Kraepelin’s ghost. Psychother Psychosom 2007; 76:65–69.
- Crow TJ. The continuum of psychosis and its genetic origins. The sixty-fifth Maudsley lecture. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 156:788–797.
- Crow TJ. The failure of the Kraepelinian binary concept and the search for the psychosis gene. Kerr A, McClelland H. Concepts of mental disorder: a continuing debate. London: Gaskell, 1991:37–41.
- Heinrichs RW, Ammari N, McDermid Vaz S, Miles AA. Are schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder neuropsychologically distinguishable? Schizophr Res 2008; 99:149–154.
- Craddock N, O'Donovan MC, Owen MJ. Genes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder? Implications for psychiatric nosology. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32:9–16.
- Kuhn, TS. The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research. Crombie AC Scientific Change (Symposium on the History of Science, University of Oxford, 9–15 July 1961). New York, NY and London: Basic Books and Heinemann, 1963: 347–369.