The low pass rate in the RANZCP clinical examinations: is the exam the problem?

References

• RANZCP Curriculum Improvement Project Reference Committee. Proposal for a competency-based curriculum framework for the RANZCP Fellowship Program. Melbourne, RANZCP 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Singh BS, Doherty P. The first 20 years of the RANZCP examination: 1970–1990. Australas Psychiatry 1993; 1:7–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adler R, Mathieson S. Throwing out the bathwater: preparing psychiatrists for the 21st century. Australas Psychiatry 1998; 6:296–302.
   Google Scholar
• Handrinos D. Report on 1992 by-laws case histories, clinical vivas, and consultancy viva examinations. Australas Psychiatry 2000; 8:199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Condon J. The RANZCP membership examination: a review of the relevant literature. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1991; 25:383–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minas IH, McGorry PD. The RANZCP vivas: a suitable case for examination. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1988; 22:432–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Council. RANZCP Accreditation Report. Melbourne: Australian Medical Council, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Handrinos D. Reflections of a retiring examiner. Australas Psychiatry 2008; 16:281–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RANZCP. Report on the May 2009 Trainee Clinical Examinations.
   Google Scholar
• RANZCP. Report on the October 2008 Trainee Clinical Examinations.
   Google Scholar
• RANZCP. Report on the May 2008 Trainee Clinical Examinations.
   Google Scholar
• RANZCP. Report on the October 2007 Trainee Clinical Examinations.
   Google Scholar
• RANZCP. Report on the October 2009 Trainee Clinical Examinations.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce P, Burnett P, Crawshaw J . An outline of the planned work of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ Board of Education. Australas Psychiatry 2008; 16:74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39:309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RANZCP. Regulations. Basic training and advanced training for fellowship. Version 17. Melbourne, RANZCP 2003.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald J. Supervision of psychiatric trainees in the RANZCP: an exploration of the individual hour. PhD thesis. University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998; 8:341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research, second. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, second. New York: Sage; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Tesch R. Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. London: RoutledgeFalmer, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Dey I. Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Researchware. HyperRESEARCH, version 2.6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Scolari, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson L, Aitken P, Hayes T. Are medical postgraduate certification processes valid? A systematic review of the published evidence. Med Educ 2002; 36:73–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut M. A wider perspective on assessment. Med Educ 2004; 38:803–804.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newble DI, Jaeger K. The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ 1983; 17: 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spike N, Jolly B. Are orals worth talking about? Med Educ 2003; 37:92–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR. Defining competence: a methodological review. Neufeld VR, Norman GR. Assessing clinical competence. New York: Springer, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard L, Garwood K, Schryer C, Spafford M. A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56:603–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson P. Medical talk and medical work. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007; 41:1133–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anspach RR. Notes on the sociology of medical discourse: the language of case presentation. J Health Soc Behav 1988; 29: 357–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard LA, Haber RJ. What do we mean by ‘relevance’? A clinical and rhetorical definition with implications for teaching and learning the case-presentation format. Acad Med 1999; 74:S124–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber RJ, Lingard LA. Learning oral presentation skills. A rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. J G Intern Med 2001; 16:308–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarangi S, Roberts C. The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. Sarangi S, Roberts C. Talk, work and institutional order discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McConville B. Hints on passing post-graduate clinical and oral examinations in psychiatry. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1982; 16:73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chur-Hansen A, McLean S. Supervisor as formative assessor: a qualitative study. Focus Health Prof Educ 2006; 8:69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Chur-Hansen A, McLean S. Supervisors’ views about their trainees and supervision. Australas Psychiatry 2007; 15:273–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar